Subscribe to RSS
Please copy the URL and add it into your RSS Feed Reader.
https://www.thieme-connect.de/rss/thieme/en/10.1055-s-00000083.xml
Synlett 2012; 23(11): 1696-1700
DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1290406
DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1290406
letter
Hydrophobically Assisted Separation-Friendly Mitsunobu Reaction
Further Information
Publication History
Received: 09 April 2012
Accepted after revision: 06 May 2012
Publication Date:
14 June 2012 (online)
![](https://www.thieme-connect.de/media/synlett/201211/lookinside/thumbnails/10.1055-s-0031-1290406-1.jpg)
Abstract
A separation-friendly Mitsunobu reaction using hydrophobic-tagged acids is reported. Commercially available or simply prepared and recyclable hydrophobic-tagged acids can react with various alcohols to afford the target products in high yield with easy purification based on C-18 silica solid-phase extraction or normal silica gel filtration.
Key words
Mitsunobu reaction - esterification - hydrophobic tag - solid-phase extraction - inversion of configurationSupporting Information
- for this article is available online at http://www.thieme-connect.com/ejournals/toc/synlett.
- Supporting Information
-
References and Notes
- 1a But TY. S, Toy PH. Chem.–Asian J. 2007; 2: 1340
- 1b Swamy KC. K, Kumar NN. B, Balaraman E, Kumar KV. P. P. Chem. Rev. 2009; 109: 2551
- 1c Reynolds AJ, Kassiou M. Curr. Org. Chem. 2009; 13: 1610
- 2a Dandapani S, Curran DP. Chem.–Eur. J. 2004; 10: 3130
- 2b Dembinski R. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2004; 2763
- 3a Choi MK. W, He HS, Toy PH. J. Org. Chem. 2003; 68: 9831
- 3b Arnold LD, Assil HI, Vederas JC. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989; 111: 3973
- 3c Aronov AM, Gelb MH. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998; 39: 4947
- 3d Su S, Giguere JR, Schaus SE, Porco JA. Jr. Tetrahedron 2004; 60: 8645
- 4a Markowicz MW, Dembinski R. Org. Lett. 2002; 4: 3785
- 4b Harned AM, He HS, Toy PH, Flynn DL, Hanson PR. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004; 127: 52
- 4c Poupon J.-C, Boezio AA, Charette AB. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2006; 45: 1415
- 4d Figlus M, Wellaway N, Cooper AW. J, Sollis SL, Hartley RC. ACS Comb. Sci. 2011; 13: 280
- 4e Curran DP, Bajpai R, Sanger E. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2006; 348: 1621
- 4f Wentworth PJr, Vandersteen AM, Janda KD. Chem. Commun. 1997; 759
- 5a Barrett AG. M, Roberts RS, Schröder J. Org. Lett. 2000; 2: 2999
- 5b Harned AM, Mukherjee S, Flynn DL, Hanson PR. Org. Lett. 2003; 5: 15
- 5c Harned AM, Hanson PR. Org. Lett. 2002; 4: 1007
- 5d Maity PK, Rolfe A, Samarakoon TB, Faisal S, Kurtz RD, Long TR, Schätz A, Flynn DL, Grass RN, Stark WJ, Reiser O, Hanson PR. Org. Lett. 2011; 13: 8
- 5e Maity PK, Kainz QM, Faisal S, Rolfe A, Samarakoon TB, Basha FZ, Reiser O, Hanson PR. Chem. Commun. 2011; 47: 12524
- 6a Pozsgay V. Org. Lett. 1999; 1: 477
- 6b Pozsgay V. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2000; 11: 151
- 6c Chiba K, Kono Y, Kim S, Nishimoto K, Kitano Y, Tada M. Chem. Commun. 2002; 1766
- 6d Kim S, Tsuruyama A, Ohmori A, Chiba K. Chem. Commun. 2008; 1816
- 6e Hirose T, Kasai T, Akimoto T, Endo A, Sugawara A, Nagasawa K, Shiomi K, Ōmura S, Sunazuka T. Tetrahedron 2011; 67: 6633
- 6f Kitada S, Fujita S, Okada Y, Kim S, Chiba K. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2011; 21: 4476
- 6g Bauer J, Rademann J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005; 127: 7296
- 6h Tana G, Kitada S, Fujita S, Okada Y, Kim S, Chiba K. Chem. Commun. 2010; 46: 8219
- 6i Encinas L, Chiara JL. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2009; 2163
- 6j Iijima M, Mikami Y, Yoshioka T, Kim S, Kamiya H, Chiba K. Langmuir 2009; 25: 11043
- 7a Hughes DL, Reamer RA. J. Org. Chem. 1996; 61: 2967
- 7b Harvey PJ, von Itzstein M, Jenkins ID. Tetrahedron 1997; 53: 3933
- 8 Dodge JA, Trujillo JI, Presnell M. J. Org. Chem. 1994; 59: 234
- 9 Kondoh A, Yorimitsu H, Oshima K. Tetrahedron 2006; 62: 2357
- 10 Mitsunobu Reaction and Purification by Silica Gel Filtration; Typical Procedure (8g): To a solution of acid 7 (77.0 mg, 0.17 mmol), alcohol g (21.0 mg, 0.13 mmol), and Ph3P (67.0 mg, 0.26 mmol) in THF (6 mL) under argon, was added DEAD (47.0 mg, 0.27 mmol) dropwise. The mixture was stirred at 0 °C for 1 h and for 2 h at r.t. Silica gel (1.00 g) was then added to the reaction vessel and the solvents were removed. The silica gel with the adsorbed reaction mixture on it was transferred to a column (2.5 cm diameter) that was previously filled to a height of 5 cm with silica gel, and washed with EtOAc–PE (1:8, v/v). The filtrates containing the product were collected and concentrated to give 8g as a white solid (67.0 mg, 88% yield); mp 56–57 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 8.22 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2 H), 7.99 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2 H), 5.50 (s, 1 H), 3.12–3.08 (m, 2 H), 2.11–2.07 (m, 1 H), 1.93–1.79 (m, 2 H), 1.77–1.65 (m, 3 H), 1.58–0.83 (m, 47 H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 164.29, 142.81, 135.64, 130.28, 128.20, 72.94, 56.23, 46.91, 39.09, 34.71, 31.90, 29.686, 29.62, 29.60, 29.52, 29.43, 29.40, 29.34, 29.22, 28.97, 28.26, 26.79, 25.37, 22.67, 22.59, 22.10, 20.94, 20.76, 14.10. HRMS: m/z [M + NH4]+ calcd for C35H64NO4S: 594.4556; found: 594.4553
- 11 Alexander V, Choi WJ, Chun J, Kim HO, Jeon JH, Tosh DK, Lee HW, Chandra G, Choi J, Jeong LS. Org. Lett. 2010; 12: 2242
- 12 Baumberger F, Vasella A, Schauer R. Helv. Chim. Acta 1988; 71: 429
- 13 In SPE operation, double hydrophobic chain tagged products remained quantitatively adsorbed on the C-18 silica when rinsing the support with MeOH/water (95:5), even MeOH for the first 10 mL, whereas the other molecules without the tag were found to be completely rinsed out of the support, including the hydrophobic starting materials
- 14 Mitsunobu Reaction and Purification by C-18 SPE; Typical Procedure (14h): To a solution of acid 13 (68.0 mg, 0.1 mmol), alcohol h (67.0 mg, 0.12 mmol), and Ph3P (53.0 mg, 0.2 mmol) in THF (6 mL) under argon, was added DEAD (37.0 mg, 0.21 mmol) dropwise at 0 °C. The mixture was stirred for 1 h at 0 °C and for 2 h at r.t. C-18 silica gel [500 mg, LiChroprep RP-18 (40–63 μm)] was added to the reaction vessel and the solvents were removed. The dry C-18 silica gel with the adsorbed reaction mixture on it was transferred to a column (1.8 cm diameter) that was previously filled to a height of 1 cm with C-18 silica gel. The C-18 silica gel was washed with MeOH–H2O (2:1, 30 mL), MeOH (2 × 20 mL), and acetone (30 mL) under reduced pressure. The filtrates containing the desorbed product were collected and concentrated to give 14h (114 mg, 94% yield) as a colorless oil. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 8.18 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2 H), 7.93 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2 H), 7.60 (d, J = 6.2 Hz, 4 H), 7.49–7.18 (m, 16 H), 5.50 (dd, J = 9.4, 4.8 Hz, 1 H), 4.61 (t, J = 12.6 Hz, 1 H), 4.55 (d, J = 12.1 Hz, 1 H), 4.49 (d, J = 12.1 Hz, 1 H), 4.12 (td, J = 7.9, 4.2 Hz, 1 H), 3.78–3.73 (m, 4 H), 2.91 (br s, 1 H), 1.94–1.67 (m, 5 H), 1.58–1.53 (m, 3 H), 1.50–1.12 (m, 64 H), 1.00 (s, 9 H), 0.88 (t, J = 6.5 Hz, 6 H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 164.59, 142.23, 138.23, 137.85, 135.51, 134.72, 133.64, 133.54, 130.30, 129.65, 128.85, 128.38, 128.30, 127.77, 127.65, 127.59, 75.05, 74.43, 73.19, 73.12, 68.26, 64.68, 59.91, 33.54, 31.91, 29.68, 29.58, 29.51, 29.34, 29.27, 27.89, 26.84, 26.75, 22.67, 19.12, 14.08. MS (MALDI): m/z calcd for C77H116NaO7SSi: 1235.8; found: 1235.6. Anal. Calcd for C77H116O7SSi: C, 76.19; H, 9.63. Found: C, 76.09; H, 9.53