J Reconstr Microsurg 2012; 28(01): 49-62
DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1285990
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Autologous Alternatives to Facial Transplantation

Lawrence Gottlieb
1   Department of Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
,
Shailesh Agarwal
1   Department of Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

26 May 2011

30 May 2011

Publication Date:
23 August 2011 (online)

Abstract

Advances in autologous reconstructive concepts, principles, and techniques allow us to close wounds of almost any size. The concept of three-dimensional (3-D) functional units of the face is discussed. Five cases of facial deformity are presented to demonstrate the concept of reconstructing different “functional” units of the face with consideration for restoring the 3-D loss of tissue within the anatomic boundaries of the aesthetic units. This article demonstrates that most individual parts or functional units can be reconstructed with autologous techniques in an acceptable way. It is when large segments of multiple contiguous functional units are destroyed that these techniques fall short of rebuilding parts that function harmoniously with the rest of the face.

 
  • References

  • 1 Wallace AF. The early development of pedicle flaps. J R Soc Med 1978; 71 (11) 834-838
  • 2 Mazzola RF, Lupo G. Evolving concepts in lip reconstruction. Clin Plast Surg 1984; 11 (4) 583-617
  • 3 Donelan MB. Discussion-Aesthetic restoration of the severely disfigured face in burn victims: A comprehensive strategy. Plast Reconstr Surg 1995; 96 (7) 1586-1587
  • 4 Gonzalez-Ulloa M. Restoration of the face covering by means of selected skin in regional aesthetic units. Br J Plast Surg 1956; 9 (3) 212-221
  • 5 González-Ulloa M. Regional aesthetic units of the face. Plast Reconstr Surg 1987; 79 (3) 489-490 [Letter]
  • 6 Gonzalez-Ulloa M, Castillo A, Stevens E, Alvarez Fuertes G, Leonelli F, Ubaldo F. Preliminary study of the total restoration of the facial skin. Plast Reconstr Surg (1946) 1954; 13 (3) 151-161
  • 7 Burget GC, Menick FJ. The subunit principle in nasal reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 1985; 76 (2) 239-247
  • 8 Burget GC, Menick FJ. Aesthetic restoration of one-half the upper lip. Plast Reconstr Surg 1986; 78 (5) 583-593
  • 9 Burget GC, Menick FJ. Nasal reconstruction: seeking a fourth dimension. Plast Reconstr Surg 1986; 78 (2) 145-157
  • 10 Gottlieb LJ, Krieger LM. From the reconstructive ladder to the reconstructive elevator. Plast Reconstr Surg 1994; 93 (7) 1503-1504
  • 11 Esser JF. Preservation of innervation and circulatory supply in plastic restoration of upper lip. Ann Surg 1934; 99 (1) 101-111
  • 12 Gottlieb LJ, Hornik B. Camouflage free flaps. The aesthetic facial reconstruction in adults and children. Meeting; Tucson, AZ; 2003
  • 13 Siemionow M, Unal S, Agaoglu G, Sari A. A cadaver study in preparation for facial allograft transplantation in humans: part I. What are alternative sources for total facial defect coverage?. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006; 117 (3) 864-872 discussion 873–875
  • 14 Cohn AB, Wu LG, Lohman R, Gottlieb LJ. Near-circumferential musculocutaneous/perforator thigh flap on a single arterial pedicle: a novel option for large soft-tissue defects. American Society of Reconstructive Microsurgery; Tucson, AZ; January 2006.
  • 15 Walton RL, Levin LS. Face transplantation: the view from Duke University and the University of Chicago. South Med J 2006; 99 (4) 417-418