ABSTRACT
Two cochlear implant users engaged in casual conversation, each with an unfamiliar communication partner in adverse listening conditions. Conversational analysis was performed to characterize how the two men repaired communication breakdowns and to identify cooperative conversational behaviors. A model of communication breakdown repair is presented. We suggest that because casual conversation is a cooperative enterprise, listeners attempt to adhere to two maxims: receive readily and recognize genuinely. Implications for aural rehabilitation are considered.
KEYWORDS
Conversational analysis - conversational fluency - hearing loss - repair strategies - bluffing - maxims of conversation
REFERENCES
-
1
Lumsden D.
Kinds of conversational cooperation.
J of Pragmatics.
2008;
40
1896-1908
-
2 Grice H P. Logic and conversation. In: Cole P, Morgan J Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts. New York, NY; Academic Press 1975: 41-58
-
3 Tye-Murray N. Foundations of Aural Rehabilitation: Children, Adults, and Their Family Members. 3rd ed. Clifton Park, NY; Delmar Cengage Learning 2009
-
4
Erber N P.
Dyalog: a computer-based measure of conversational performance.
J Acad Rehabil Audiol.
1998;
31
69-76
-
5
Tye-Murray N, Witt S, Schum L, Sobaski C.
Communication breakdowns: partner contingencies and partner reactions.
J Acad Rehabil Audiol.
1995;
25
1-27
-
6 Hutchby I, Wooffitt R. Conversation Analysis. Cambridge, United Kingdom; Polity Press 2008
-
7 Beattie G. Talk: Analysis of Speech and Nonverbal Behavior in Conversation. Milton Keynes, United Kingdom; Open University Press 1983
-
8
Drummond K.
A backward glance at interruptions.
West J Speech Commun.
1989;
53
150-166
-
9
Tye-Murray N, Witt S, Schum L.
Effects of talker familiarity on communication breakdown in conversations with adult cochlear implant users.
Ear Hear.
1995;
16
459-469
-
10
Gagné J P, Stelmacovich P, Yovetich W.
Reactions to requests for clarification used by hearing-impaired individuals.
Volta Review.
1991;
93(3)
129-143
-
11
Tye-Murray N, Witt S.
Conversational moves and conversational styles of adult cochlear-implant users.
J Acad Rehabil Audiol.
1996;
29
11-26
-
12
Heydebrand G, Mauze E, Tye-Murray N, Binzer S, Skinner M.
The efficacy of a structured group therapy intervention in improving communication and coping skills for adult cochlear implant recipients.
Int J Audiol.
2005;
44(5)
272-280
-
13 Lovibond S H, Lovibond P F. Manual for the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales. 2nd Ed. Sydney, Australia; Psychology Foundation 1995
-
14 Sacks H. An initial investigation of the usability of conversational data for doing sociology. In: Sudnow D Studies in Social Interaction. New York, NY; Free Press 1972: 31-74
-
15
Caissie R, Gibson C L.
The effectiveness of repair strategies used by people with hearing losses and their conversational partners.
Volta Review.
1997;
99
203-218
Nancy Tye-MurrayPh.D.
Department of Otolaryngology, Campus Box 8115, Washington University School of Medicine
660 South Euclid Avenue, St. Louis, MO 63110
eMail: murrayn@ent.wustl.edu
