Am J Perinatol 2009; 26(5): 379-382
DOI: 10.1055/s-0028-1110090
© Thieme Medical Publishers

High Incidence of Cord Entanglement during Early Pregnancy Detected by Three-Dimensional Sonography

Ronnie Tepper1 , Devora Kidron2 , Rami Aviram1 , Offer Markovitch1 , Reli Hershkovitz3
  • 1Ultrasound Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
  • 2Department of Pathology, Meir Medical Center, Kfar Saba, Israel
  • 3Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Soroka University Medical Center, Beer Sheva, Israel
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
09 December 2008 (online)

ABSTRACT

We sought to determine the incidence of cord entanglement around any part of fetal body during early gestation using three-dimensional (3D) sonography. A prospective consecutive study was designed and 3D ultrasound was performed. Two hundred thirty-seven singleton pregnancies between 13 and 16 weeks were included. Cord entanglement was defined when one or more of the following was detected: cord around neck, hand, leg, thorax, abdomen, shoulder. We considered cord entanglement when one or more loops of cord encircled any part of body. Free-floating cord through all its length in the amniotic fluid was defined as free cord. Cord entanglement was observed in 149 (62.9%) patients. Of those, 64 (42.9%) cords were entangled around necks, 23 (15.4%) around legs, 19 (12.7%) around hands, 7 (4.8%) around abdomens, 36 (24.2%) around other body parts (thorax, shoulder, and pelvis). The incidence of total cord entanglement was similar between 13 and 16 weeks' gestation and was between 60 and 65%. The incidence of early pregnancy cord entanglement was 62.9%. According to the literature, this incidence is higher in comparison to the incidence of cord entanglement later in pregnancy. Therefore, this phenomenon may be considered a part of normal early fetal development.

REFERENCES

  • 1 Sheiner E, Abramowicz J S, Levy A, Silberstein T, Mazor M, Hershkovitz R. Nuchal cord is not associated with adverse perinatal outcome.  Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2006;  274 81-83
  • 2 Clapp J F, Stepanachak W, Hashimoto K, Ehrenberg H, Lopez B. The natural history of antenatal nuchal cords.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;  189 488-493
  • 3 Crawford J S. Cord around the neck. Incidence and sequelae.  Acta Paediatr. 1962;  51 594-603
  • 4 Collins J H. Nuchal cord type A and type B.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997;  177 94
  • 5 Rogers M S, Ip P W, Qin Y, Rors S M, Sabota D. Relationship between umbilical cord morphology and nuchal cord entanglement.  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2003;  82 32-37
  • 6 Larson J D, Rayburn W F, Crosby S, Thurnau G R. Multiple nuchal cord entanglements and intrapartum complications.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995;  173 1228-1231
  • 7 Strong T H, Sarno A, Paul R H. Significance of intrapartum amniotic fluid volume in the presence of nuchal cords.  J Reprod Med. 1992;  37 718-720
  • 8 Rhoades D A, Latza U, Mueller B A. Risk factors and outcomes associated with nuchal cord. A population-based study.  J Reprod Med. 1999;  44 39-45
  • 9 Ogueh O, Al-Tarkait A, Vallerand D, Rouah F, Morin L, Benjamin A, Usher R H. Obstetric factors related to nuchal cord.  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2006;  85 810-814
  • 10 Schaefer M, Laurichesse-Delmas H, Ville Y. The effect of nuchal cord on nuchal translucency measurements at 10–14 weeks.  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1998;  11 271-273
  • 11 Peregrine E, O'Brien P, Jauniaux E. Ultrasound detection of nuchal cord prior to labor induction and the risk of cesarean section.  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2005;  25 160-164
  • 12 Schäffer L, Burkhardt T, Zimmerman R, Kurmanavicius J. Nuchal cords in term and postterm deliveries—do we need to know?.  Obstet Gynecol. 2005;  106 23-28
  • 13 Collins J H, Collins C L, Weckwerth S R, De Angelis L. Nuchal cords: timing of prenatal diagnosis and duration.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995;  173 768
  • 14 de Laat M W, Nikkels P G, Franx A, Visser G H. The Roach muscle bundle and umbilical cord coiling.  Early Hum Dev. 2007;  83 571-574
  • 15 Predanic M, Perni S C, Chasen S T, Baergen R N, Chervenak F A. Assessment of umbilical cord coiling during the routine fetal sonographic anatomic survey in the second trimester.  J Ultrasound Med. 2005;  24 185-191
  • 16 Kashanian M, Akbarian A, Kouhpayehzadeh J. The umbilical coiling index and adverse perinatal outcome.  Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2006;  95 8-13
  • 17 Benirschke K, Kaufmann P. In: Pathology of the Human Placenta. 4th ed. New York, Berlin, Heidelberg, Barcelona, Hong Kong, London, Milan, Singapore, Tokyo; Springer 2000: 921
  • 18 Sadovsky E, Weinstein D, Aboulafia Y, Milwidski A, Polishuk W Z. Decreased fetal movements associated with umbilical cord complications.  Isr J Med Sci. 1977;  13 295-298
  • 19 Sornes T. Umbilical cord encirclements and Apgar scores.  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1998;  77 313-316
  • 20 Jauniaux E, Ramsey B, Peellaerts C, Scholler Y. Perinatal features of pregnancy complicated by nuchal cord.  Am J Perinatol. 1995;  12 255-258

Reli HershkovitzM.D. 

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Soroka University Medical Center

P.O.B. 151, Beer Sheva 84101, Israel

Email: ralikah@bgumail.bgu.ac.il