Download PDF
J Wrist Surg
DOI: 10.1055/a-2568-8592
Scientific Article

Excision of the Proximal Pole of the Scaphoid Affects the Midcarpal Joint

Nicholas Parody
1   Department of Orthopedic Surgery, New York University, School of Medicine, New York, New York
,
Paul Izard
1   Department of Orthopedic Surgery, New York University, School of Medicine, New York, New York
,
Steven Glickel
1   Department of Orthopedic Surgery, New York University, School of Medicine, New York, New York
,
Sallie Yassin
1   Department of Orthopedic Surgery, New York University, School of Medicine, New York, New York
,
Ronit Wollstein 
1   Department of Orthopedic Surgery, New York University, School of Medicine, New York, New York
2   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Alabama Heersink School of Medicine, Birmingham, Alabama
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background

Excision of the proximal pole of the scaphoid causes wrist instability. The often small proximal fragment can be challenging to retain, and multiple procedures are used to preserve the proximal pole. However, the mechanical implications of a proximal pole loss remain unclear. Possibly, under certain circumstances, the proximal pole can be excised without causing instability.

Purposes

This study aimed to use a validated finite element model (FEM) of normal Type 1 and Type 2 wrists to examine the effect of removal of the proximal scaphoid pole on forces moving through the midcarpal joint. We hypothesize that the amount of bone removed alters the transfer of forces through the midcarpal joint and that this effect will differ between Type 1 and Type 2 wrists.

Materials and Methods

Fourteen wrist computed tomography (CT) scans were converted to .stl files: five Type 1 and nine Type 2. Using an established wrist FEM model, the proximal scaphoid was sequentially excised up to 50%. A 100-N computer-generated load was applied to the dorsal crests of the trapezoid and capitate. Carpal bone displacement was recorded in the x, y, and z directions. The percentage change from intact was calculated for Type 1 and 2 wrists, the direction of bony translation was recorded, and an index quantifying instability based on translation upon loading was calculated.

Results

The excision of the proximal pole of the scaphoid caused significant translation of the carpal bones in both wrist types, p < 0.001. Type 2 wrists reached significant displacement after 15% excision, compared to 25% for Type 1 wrists.

The direction of translation differed between Type 1 and 2 wrists.

In general, Type 1 wrists seem to be less stable than Type 2 wrists.

Conclusion

This study supports the importance of scaphoid proximal pole for wrist stability and the difference in carpal–bone translation between midcarpal joint types.

This can be used in surgical planning when faced with fractures, nonunion, and complex fracture-dislocations.

Keywords

proximal pole of the scaphoid - lunate type - midcarpal - joint - scaphoid - wrist

Supplementary Material



Publication History

Received: 04 November 2024

Accepted: 28 March 2025

Article published online:
30 April 2025

© 2025. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Garcia-Elias M, Lluch A. Partial excision of scaphoid: is it ever indicated?. Hand Clin 2001; 17 (04) 687-695 , x
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 2 Gras M, Wahegaonkar AL, Mathoulin C. Treatment of avascular necrosis of the proximal pole of the scaphoid by arthroscopic resection and prosthetic semireplacement arthroplasty using the pyrocarbon adaptive proximal scaphoid implant (APSI): Long-term functional outcomes. J Wrist Surg 2012; 1 (02) 159-164
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 3 Ecker J, Shahbaz L, Kohli S, Breidahl W, Andrijich C. Arthroscopic bone graft and internal fixation of non-union of the proximal pole of the scaphoid: Surgical technique and outcomes. J Wrist Surg 2022; 11 (06) 535-540
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 4 Ek ET, Wang K. Fixation of ultrasmall proximal pole scaphoid fractures using bioabsorbable osteochondral fixation nails. J Hand Surg Am 2017; 42 (09) 758.e1-758.e4
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 5 Yao J, Read B, Hentz VR. The fragmented proximal pole scaphoid nonunion treated with rib autograft: case series and review of the literature. J Hand Surg Am 2013; 38 (11) 2188-2192
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 6 Butler S, Galbraith J, Ek ETH, Berger A, McCombe D, Tham SK. A comparison of rib osteochondral graft to medial femoral trochlear osteocartilaginous graft for the salvage of the fragmented scaphoid proximal pole: A single-center experience with minimum 2-year follow-up. J Wrist Surg 2023; 13 (04) 346-351
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 7 Cioffi A, Rovere G, Bosco F. et al. Treatment of scaphoid non-unions with custom-made 3D-printed titanium partial and total scaphoid prostheses and scaphoid interosseous ligament reconstruction. Healthcare (Basel) 2023; 11 (24) 3123
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 8 Ferrero M, Carità E, Giacalone F. et al. Prosthetic replacement of the scaphoid proximal pole: Should it be the future?. Hand (N Y) 2022; 17 (05) 899-904
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 9 Viegas SF. The lunatohamate articulation of the midcarpal joint. Arthroscopy 1990; 6 (01) 5-10
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 10 Viegas SF, Patterson RM, Hokanson JA, Davis J. Wrist anatomy: incidence, distribution, and correlation of anatomic variations, tears, and arthrosis. J Hand Surg Am 1993; 18 (03) 463-475
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 11 Marqués R, Melchor J, Sánchez-Montesinos I, Roda O, Rus G, Hernández-Cortés P. Biomechanical finite element method model of the proximal carpal row and experimental validation. Front Physiol 2022; 12: 749372
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 12 Bosisio MR, Talmant M, Skalli W, Laugier P, Mitton D. Apparent Young's modulus of human radius using inverse finite-element method. J Biomech 2007; 40 (09) 2022-2028
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 13 Kundu J, Pati F, Shim J-H, Cho D-W. 12 - Rapid prototyping technology for bone regeneration. In: Narayan R. ed. Woodhead Publishing Series in Biomaterials, Rapid Prototyping of Biomaterials. 2nd ed.. Woodhead Publishing; 2014: 289-314
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 14 Spatz HC, O'Leary EJ, Vincent JF. Young's moduli and shear moduli in cortical bone. Proc Biol Sci 1996; 263 (1368) 287-294
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 15 Grimal Q, Laugier P. Quantitative ultrasound assessment of cortical bone properties beyond bone mineral density. IRBMI 2019; 40 (01) 16-24
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 16 Zioupos P, Cook RB, Hutchinson JR. Some basic relationships between density values in cancellous and cortical bone. J Biomech 2008; 41 (09) 1961-1968
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 17 Currey JD. Bone and Natural Composites: Properties. Encyclopedia of Materials: Science and Technology. 2nd ed.. Elsevier; 2001: 776-781
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 18 Ramlee MH, Beng GK, Bajuri N, Abdul Kadir MR. Finite element analysis of the wrist in stroke patients: the effects of hand grip. Med Biol Eng Comput 2018; 56 (07) 1161-1171
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 19 Smith BS, Cooney WP. Revision of failed bone grafting for nonunion of the scaphoid. Treatment options and results. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1996; (327) 98-109
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 20 Tesoriero P, Becker J, Passano B, Huang S, Petchprapa C, Wollstein R. Does midcarpal joint structure affect development of arthritis in the wrist?. J Wrist Surg 2022; 12 (01) 28-31
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 21 Wollstein R, Kramer A, Friedlander S, Werner F. Midcarpal structure effect on force distribution through the radiocarpal joint. J Wrist Surg 2019; 8 (06) 477-481
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 22 Rainbow MJ, Kamal RN, Leventhal E. et al. In vivo kinematics of the scaphoid, lunate, capitate, and third metacarpal in extreme wrist flexion and extension. J Hand Surg Am 2013; 38 (02) 278-288
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 23 Kamal RN, Chehata A, Rainbow MJ, Llusá M, Garcia-Elias M. The effect of the dorsal intercarpal ligament on lunate extension after distal scaphoid excision. J Hand Surg Am 2012; 37 (11) 2240-2245
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 24 Viegas SF, Patterson RM, Todd PD, McCarty P. Load mechanics of the midcarpal joint. J Hand Surg Am 1993; 18 (01) 14-18
    Search in Google Scholar