Download PDF
Am J Perinatol
DOI: 10.1055/a-2347-4015
Original Article

Influences of a Remote Monitoring Program of Home Nasogastric Tube Feeds on Transition from NICU to Home

Megan Quinn
1   Oregon Health and Science University School of Nursing, Portland, Oregon
,
Sandra Banta-Wright
1   Oregon Health and Science University School of Nursing, Portland, Oregon
,
Jamie B. Warren
2   Department of Pediatrics, Oregon Health and Science University School of Medicine, Doernbecher Children's Hospital, Portland, Oregon
› Author Affiliations Funding Funding for this study was provided by the Friends of Doernbecher Grant Program.
› Further Information
Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Objective The transition from the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) to the home is complex and multifaceted for families and infants, particularly those with ongoing medical needs. Our hospital utilizes a remote monitoring program called Growing @ Home (G@H) to support discharge from the NICU with continued nasogastric tube (NGT) feeds. We aim to describe the experience of the transition from NICU to home for families enrolled in G@H.

Study Design Using a semistructured interviewing technique, parents of infants discharged on G@H were interviewed at NICU discharge, at 1 month, and at 6 months after NICU discharge. Interviews were recorded and transcribed into data analysis software. Conventional content analysis was used to analyze qualitative data. Codes were assigned to describe key elements of the interviews and used to identify major themes.

Results Parents (n = 17) identified three major themes when discussing the effect of G@H on the transition to home. The program provided a means of escape from the NICU, allowing families to stop living split lives between their homes and the NICU. It acted as a middle ground between the restrictive yet supportive NICU environment, and the normal yet isolated home environment. G@H served as a safety net for families, providing a continued connection to the NICU for their still-fragile infants.

Conclusion G@H utilizes telehealth to positively support the complex transition from NICU to home for families and infants discharged with NGT feeds.

Key Points

  • G@H program supported parents in their transition from NICU to home.

  • G@H program provided a means of escape from the NICU.

  • G@H program was a middle ground between the NICU and home.

  • G@H program created a safety net after discharge.

  • Follow-up with a consistent provider was essential to a positive parent experience.

Keywords

neonatal intensive care - patient discharge - remote monitoring - nasogastric tube - telehealth - parent engagement - neonatal transition to home - neonatal feeding

Authors' Contributions

M.Q. conceptualized and designed the study, conducted interviews, coded data, conducted initial analysis and interpretation of data, participated in the initial drafting of the manuscript, and reviewed and revised the manuscript. S.B-W. conceptualized and designed the study, coded data, participated in the initial drafting of the manuscript, and reviewed and revised the manuscript. J.B.W. conceptualized and designed the study, participated in patient recruitment and consent, participated in initial drafting of the manuscript, and reviewed and revised the manuscript. All authors critically reviewed the manuscript for important intellectual content, approved the final manuscript as submitted, and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work.


Ethical Approval

The study was approved by the Institutional Review Boards at Oregon Health and Science University (approval no.: 22964). The study was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.




Publication History

Received: 19 February 2024

Accepted: 13 June 2024

Accepted Manuscript online:
18 June 2024

Article published online:
11 July 2024

© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Fetus and Newborn. Hospital discharge of the high-risk neonate. Pediatrics 2008; 122 (05) 1119-1126
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Edwards L, Cotten CM, Smith PB. et al; Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. Inadequate oral feeding as a barrier to discharge in moderately preterm infants. J Perinatol 2019; 39 (09) 1219-1228
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Ortenstrand A, Waldenström U, Winbladh B. Early discharge of preterm infants needing limited special care, followed by domiciliary nursing care. Acta Paediatr 1999; 88 (09) 1024-1030
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Meerlo-Habing ZE, Kosters-Boes EA, Klip H, Brand PL. Early discharge with tube feeding at home for preterm infants is associated with longer duration of breast feeding. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2009; 94 (04) F294-F297
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Lundberg B, Lindgren C, Palme-Kilander C, Örtenstrand A, Bonamy AK, Sarman I. Hospital-assisted home care after early discharge from a Swedish neonatal intensive care unit was safe and readmissions were rare. Acta Paediatr 2016; 105 (08) 895-901
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 van Kampen F, de Mol A, Korstanje J. et al. Early discharge of premature infants < 37 weeks gestational age with nasogastric tube feeding: the new standard of care?. Eur J Pediatr 2019; 178 (04) 497-503
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Sturm LD. Implementation and evaluation of a home gavage program for preterm infants. Neonatal Netw 2005; 24 (04) 21-25
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Evanochko C, Jancs-Kelley S, Boyle R, Fox M, Molesky M, Byrne P. Facilitating early discharge from the NICU: the development of a home gavage program and neonatal outpatient clinic. Neonatal Netw 1996; 15 (08) 44
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Ahnfeldt AM, Stanchev H, Jørgensen HL, Greisen G. Age and weight at final discharge from an early discharge programme for stable but tube-fed preterm infants. Acta Paediatr 2015; 104 (04) 377-383
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Lagatta JM, Uhing M, Acharya K. et al. Actual and potential impact of a home nasogastric tube feeding program for infants whose neonatal intensive care unit discharge is affected by delayed oral feedings. J Pediatr 2021; 234: 38-45.e2
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Khalil ST, Uhing MR, Duesing L, Visotcky A, Tarima S, Nghiem-Rao TH. Outcomes of infants with home tube feeding: comparing nasogastric vs gastrostomy tubes. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 2017; 41 (08) 1380-1385
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Mago-Shah DD, Malcolm WF, Greenberg RG, Goldstein RF. Discharging medically complex infants with supplemental nasogastric tube feeds: impact on neonatal intensive care unit length of stay and prevention of gastrostomy tubes. Am J Perinatol 2021; 38 (S 01): e207-e214
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Williams SL, Popowics NM, Tadesse DG, Poindexter BB, Merhar SL. Tube feeding outcomes of infants in a level IV NICU. J Perinatol 2019; 39 (10) 1406-1410
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 White BR, Ermarth A, Thomas D, Arguinchona O, Presson AP, Ling CY. Creation of a standard model for tube feeding at neonatal intensive care unit discharge. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 2020; 44 (03) 491-499
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Ermarth A, Thomas D, Ling CY, Cardullo A, White BR. Effective tube weaning and predictive clinical characteristics of NICU patients with feeding dysfunction. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 2020; 44 (05) 920-927
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Garne Holm K, Brødsgaard A, Zachariassen G, Smith AC, Clemensen J. Participatory design methods for the development of a clinical telehealth service for neonatal homecare. SAGE Open Med 2017; 5: 2050312117731252
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Holm KG, Clemensen J, Brødsgaard A, Smith AC, Maastrup R, Zachariassen G. Growth and breastfeeding of preterm infants receiving neonatal tele-homecare compared to hospital-based care. J Neonatal Perinatal Med 2019; 12 (03) 277-284
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Hägi-Pedersen MB, Dessau RB, Norlyk A, Stanchev H, Kronborg H. Comparison of video and in-hospital consultations during early in-home care for premature infants and their families: a randomised trial. J Telemed Telecare 2022; 28 (01) 24-36
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Gund A, Sjöqvist BA, Wigert H, Hentz E, Lindecrantz K, Bry K. A randomized controlled study about the use of eHealth in the home health care of premature infants. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2013; 13: 22
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Robinson C, Gund A, Sjöqvist BA, Bry K. Using telemedicine in the care of newborn infants after discharge from a neonatal intensive care unit reduced the need of hospital visits. Acta Paediatr 2016; 105 (08) 902-909
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Vergales BD, Murray PD, Miller SE, Vergales JE. Safety and efficacy of a home nasogastric monitoring program for premature infants. J Neonatal Perinatal Med 2022; 15 (01) 165-170
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Bardach SH, Perry AN, Kapadia NS, Richards KE, Cogswell LK, Hartman TK. Redesigning care to support earlier discharge from a neonatal intensive care unit: a design thinking informed pilot. BMJ Open Qual 2022; 11 (02) e001736
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Fisher C, Haag M, Douglas A, Kayhani A, Warren JB. Remote monitoring for neonates requiring continued nasogastric tube feeding: implementation, patient characteristics, and early outcomes. J Perinatol 2023; 43 (09) 1125-1130
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Foster C, Schinasi D, Kan K, Macy M, Wheeler D, Curfman A. Remote monitoring of patient- and family-generated health data in pediatrics. Pediatrics 2022; 149 (02) e2021054137
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Caruso CG, Warren JB, Carney PA. Parent experiences of a remote patient monitoring program enabling early discharge from the neonatal intensive care unit with nasogastric tube feeding. J Neonatal Perinatal Med 2023; 16 (02) 301-309
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Meleis AI, Sawyer LM, Im EO, Messias DKH, Schumacher K. Transition Theory. In: Meleis AI. ed. Transitions Theory: Middle range and Situation Specific Theories in Nursing Research and Practice. . Springer Publishing Company, Inc.; 2009: 52-83
    Google Scholar
  • 27 Kallio H, Pietilä AM, Johnson M, Kangasniemi M. Systematic methodological review: developing a framework for a qualitative semi-structured interview guide. J Adv Nurs 2016; 72 (12) 2954-2965
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Hsieh HF, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res 2005; 15 (09) 1277-1288
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Morse JM. Critical analysis of strategies for determining rigor in qualitative inquiry. Qual Health Res 2015; 25 (09) 1212-1222
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Lincoln YS, Guba EG. Naturalistic Inquiry. Sage Publications; 1985
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Grunberg VA, Geller PA, Bonacquisti A, Patterson CA. NICU infant health severity and family outcomes: a systematic review of assessments and findings in psychosocial research. J Perinatol 2019; 39 (02) 156-172
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Zupancic JAF. Burdens beyond biology for sick newborn infants and their families. Clin Perinatol 2018; 45 (03) 557-563
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Franck LS, Waddington C, O'Brien K. Family integrated care for preterm infants. Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am 2020; 32 (02) 149-165
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Spence CM, Stuyvenberg CL, Kane AE, Burnsed J, Dusing SC. Parent experiences in the NICU and transition to home. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2023; 20 (11) 6050
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Hannan KE, Hwang SS, Bourque SL. Readmissions among NICU graduates: who, when and why?. Semin Perinatol 2020; 44 (04) 151245
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Bourque SL, Machut KZ, Chuo J. et al; Children's Hospitals Neonatal Consortium Transitions of Care and Follow-up Focus Group. Discharge best practices of high-risk infants from regional children's hospital NICUs. Hosp Pediatr 2023; 13 (08) 716-724
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Griffith T, Singh A, Naber M. et al. Scoping review of interventions to support families with preterm infants post-NICU discharge. J Pediatr Nurs 2022; 67: e135-e149
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Zanello E, Calugi S, Rucci P. et al. Continuity of care in children with special healthcare needs: a qualitative study of family's perspectives. Ital J Pediatr 2015; 41: 7
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Machut KZ, Gilbart C, Murthy K, Michelson KN. Parental perspectives on neonatologist continuity of care. Adv Neonatal Care 2021; 21 (06) E162-E170
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar