Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/a-2301-7496
Standardization of Emergency Department Clinical Note Templates: A Retrospective Analysis across an Integrated Health System
Abstract
Background and Objective Clinical documentation is essential for conveying medical decision-making, communication between providers and patients, and capturing quality, billing, and regulatory measures during emergency department (ED) visits. Growing evidence suggests the benefits of note template standardization; however, variations in documentation practices are common. The primary objective of this study is to measure the utilization and coding performance of a standardized ED note template implemented across a nine-hospital health system.
Methods This was a retrospective study before and after the implementation of a standardized ED note template. A multi-disciplinary group consensus was built around standardized note elements, provider note workflows within the electronic health record (EHR), and how to incorporate newly required medical decision-making elements. The primary outcomes measured included the proportion of ED visits using standardized note templates, and the distribution of billing codes in the 6 months before and after implementation.
Results In the preimplementation period, a total of six legacy ED note templates were being used across nine EDs, with the most used template accounting for approximately 36% of ED visits. Marked variations in documentation elements were noted across six legacy templates. After the implementation, 82% of ED visits system-wide used a single standardized note template. Following implementation, we observed a 1% increase in the proportion of ED visits coded as highest acuity and an unchanged proportion coded as second highest acuity.
Conclusion We observed a greater than twofold increase in the use of a standardized ED note template across a nine-hospital health system in anticipation of the new 2023 coding guidelines. The development and utilization of a standardized note template format relied heavily on multi-disciplinary stakeholder engagement to inform design that worked for varied documentation practices within the EHR. After the implementation of a standardized note template, we observed better-than-anticipated coding performance.
Protection of Human and Animal Subjects
After consultation with our local IRB, this activity did not meet the criteria for human subjects research and did not require IRB review or approval per institutional policy.
Publication History
Received: 21 December 2023
Accepted: 05 April 2024
Accepted Manuscript online:
08 April 2024
Article published online:
22 May 2024
© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
References
- 1 Cohen GR, Friedman CP, Ryan AM, Richardson CR, Adler-Milstein J. Variation in physicians' electronic health record documentation and potential patient harm from that variation. J Gen Intern Med 2019; 34 (11) 2355-2367
- 2 Kroth PJ, Morioka-Douglas N, Veres S. et al. Association of electronic health record design and use factors with clinician stress and burnout. JAMA Netw Open 2019; 2 (08) e199609
- 3 Rossetti S, Rosenbloom ST. . AMIA 25 × 5, Reducing Documentation Burden Summary Report. Published 2021 . Accessed April 21, 2024 at: https://brand.amia.org/m/3aaa0f687a601441/original/25×5-toolkit.pdf
- 4 Rule A, Hribar MR. Frequent but fragmented: use of note templates to document outpatient visits at an academic health center. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2021; 29 (01) 137-141
- 5 Ebbers T, Kool RB, Smeele LE. et al. The impact of structured and standardized documentation on documentation quality; a multicenter, retrospective study. J Med Syst 2022; 46 (07) 46
- 6 Deeds SA, Hagan SL, Geyer JR. et al. Leveraging an electronic health record note template to standardize screening and testing for COVID-19. Healthc (Amst) 2020; 8 (03) 100454
- 7 Jamieson T, Ailon J, Chien V, Mourad O. An electronic documentation system improves the quality of admission notes: a randomized trial. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2017; 24 (01) 123-129
- 8 Hultman GM, Marquard JL, Lindemann E, Arsoniadis E, Pakhomov S, Melton GB. Challenges and opportunities to improve the clinician experience reviewing electronic progress notes. Appl Clin Inform 2019; 10 (03) 446-453
- 9 Cao J, Farmer R, Carry PM. et al. Standardized note templates improve electronic medical record documentation of neurovascular examinations for pediatric supracondylar humeral fractures. JBJS Open Access 2017; 2 (04) e0027
- 10 Sieja A, Markley K, Pell J. et al. Optimization sprints: improving clinician satisfaction and teamwork by rapidly reducing electronic health record burden. Mayo Clin Proc 2019; 94 (05) 793-802
- 11 Aylor M, Campbell EM, Winter C, Phillipi CA. Resident notes in an electronic health record. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 2017; 56 (03) 257-262
- 12 Wiebe N, Otero Varela L, Niven DJ, Ronksley PE, Iragorri N, Quan H. Evaluation of interventions to improve inpatient hospital documentation within electronic health records: a systematic review. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2019; 26 (11) 1389-1400
- 13 CMS. Evaluation and Management Services Guide. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Published 2023 . Accessed October 31, 2023 at: https://www.cms.gov/outreach-and-education/medicare-learning-network-mln/mlnproducts/downloads/eval-mgmt-serv-guide-icn006764.pdf
- 14 McKenzie D, Granovsky M. 2023 Documentation Guideline Changes for ED E/M Codes 99281–99285. ACEP Now, The Official Voice of Emergency Medicine. Published September 8, 2022 . Accessed October 31, 2023 at: https://www.acepnow.com/article/2023-documentation-guideline-changes-for-ed-e-m-codes-99281-99285/
- 15 Epic Systems Corporation. Epic. Published November 1, 2023 . Accessed April 21, 2024 at: https://www.epic.com/
- 16 Microsoft Corporation. PowerBI. Published online 2023. Accessed April 21, 2024 at: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/
- 17 R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Published online 2021. Accessed April 21, 2024 at: https://www.R-project.org/
- 18 Haberman SJ. The analysis of residuals in cross-classified tables. Biometrics 1973; 29 (01) 205-220
- 19 Chong AZ, Lee B, Hollenbach K, Kuelbs CL. Disappearing help text: implementing a note-based tool for in-line clinical decision support and note bloat reduction. Appl Clin Inform 2022; 13 (05) 1033-1039
- 20 Mehta R, Radhakrishnan NS, Warring CD. et al. The use of evidence-based, problem-oriented templates as a clinical decision support in an inpatient electronic health record system. Appl Clin Inform 2016; 7 (03) 790-802
- 21 Rosenbloom ST, Denny JC, Xu H, Lorenzi N, Stead WW, Johnson KB. Data from clinical notes: a perspective on the tension between structure and flexible documentation. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2011; 18 (02) 181-186