Download PDF
Drug Res (Stuttg) 2024; 74(04): 164-170
DOI: 10.1055/a-2251-6655
Original Article

An Observational Study on Cosmetics Use-related Adverse Effects: Cosmetovigilance Need of the Day

Geetika Mehta 
1   Department of Pharmacology, Raj Kumar Goel Institute of Technology (Pharmacy), Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, India
,
Daksh Raj Tyagi
1   Department of Pharmacology, Raj Kumar Goel Institute of Technology (Pharmacy), Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, India
,
Monika Sachdeva
1   Department of Pharmacology, Raj Kumar Goel Institute of Technology (Pharmacy), Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, India
,
Rashmi Tripathi
1   Department of Pharmacology, Raj Kumar Goel Institute of Technology (Pharmacy), Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, India
,
Himanshu Tyagi
1   Department of Pharmacology, Raj Kumar Goel Institute of Technology (Pharmacy), Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, India
› Author Affiliations Funding This study was not funded by any agency.
› Further Information
Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Introduction The pursuit of aesthetic attractiveness and increased awareness have contributed significantly to the growth of the cosmetic industry. However, it is crucial to recognize that even the minimal use of cosmetics may have harmful consequences for both the overall well-being and the broader community, an issue that has yet to be adequately recognized or addressed.

Objective This study is aimed at providing insights into the usage pattern of consumer behavior regarding skin care products and to assess the prevalence and determinants of cosmetic-related adverse events among the general populace.

Materials and Methods A community-based cross-sectional study was carried out for four months in a satellite city of the National Capital Region (NCR) of India. The data from 435 respondents was collected using a self-administered questionnaire and analyzed using frequencies and percentages.

Results Among 435 participants, 32.9% experienced one or more adverse effects owing to the use of skincare products; the prevalence was higher in females (36.3%). Hair loss, allergies, and dry skin were the most frequently reported adverse effects. The majority of the adverse reactions were reported with soap (21%), followed by shampoo (17%). The gender-wise difference between adverse effects of skin care products was found to be statistically significant.

Conclusion To improve the system’s efficiency, a comprehensive review of the current regulatory protocols for cosmetics is crucial. Additionally, it is essential to widely disseminate information on Cosmetovigilance and promote the reporting of any adverse effects of cosmetics within the community; this is the demand of the present time.

Keywords

cosmetics - adverse effects - cosmetovigilance - utilization behavior


Publication History

Received: 16 November 2023

Accepted: 20 January 2024

Article published online:
11 March 2024

© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • References

  • 1 Pal A, Panda P, Mukkamala S. Recent trends of cosmetics in India: A review on marketing strategies and consumer behaviour. International Journal of Management (IJM) 2020; 11: 1-10
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Kakar V, Fardouly J, Rapee RM. et al. Appearance Satisfaction Among Adolescent Girls in Australia, China, India, and Iran: The Role of Perceived Actual-Ideal Discrepancies in Facial and Bodily Attributes. Sex Roles 2023; 89: 257-276
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Nagalakshmi S, Vaishnavi S, Pavithra GM. Regulatory prototype for cosmetics in India. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research 2021; 12-16
    Google Scholar
  • 4 Vigan M, Castelain F. Cosmetovigilance: definition, regulation and use “in practice. Eur J Dermatol 2014; 24: 643-649 DOI: 10.1684/ejd.2014.2493.
    Google Scholar
  • 5 DK SS, Jain V. Challenges in formulating herbal cosmetics. Int J App Pharm 2018; 10: 47-53
    Google Scholar
  • 6 Lucca JM, Joseph R, Al Kubaish ZH. et al. An observational study on adverse reactions of cosmetics: The need of practice the Cosmetovigilance system. Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal 2020; 28: 746-753
    Google Scholar
  • 7 Kwa M, Welty LJ, Xu S. Adverse events reported to the US Food and Drug Administration for cosmetics and personal care products. JAMA internal medicine 2017; 177: 1202-1204
    Google Scholar
  • 8 Panico A, Serio F, Bagordo F. et al. Skin safety and health prevention: an overview of chemicals in cosmetic products. Journal of preventive medicine and hygiene 2019; 60: E50
    Google Scholar
  • 9 Jones O, Selinger B. The chemistry of cosmetics. Australian Academy of Science. 2019
    Google Scholar
  • 10 Goyal N, Jerold F. Biocosmetics: technological advances and future outlook. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 2021; 30: 25148-25169
    Google Scholar
  • 11 Choursiya S, Gawande P, Rathore A. A review on regulation and need of cosmetovigilance in India. Asian J Res Pharm Sci 2021; 11: 86-91
    Google Scholar
  • 12 Peinado FM, Ocón-Hernández O, Iribarne-Durán LM. et al. Cosmetic and personal care product use, urinary levels of parabens and benzophenones, and risk of endometriosis: results from the EndEA study. Environmental research 2021; 196: 110342
    Google Scholar
  • 13 Manteghi M. European cosmetics industry: Main aspects and regulation. SSRN Electron J 2017; DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3082290.
    Google Scholar
  • 14 Pereira JX, Pereira TC. Cosmetics and its health risks. Glob J Med Res 2018; 18: 63-70
    Google Scholar
  • 15 Filley AR, Woodruff CM. The Modernization of Cosmetics Regulation Act of 2022: What dermatologists need to know. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology 2023; 629-631
    Google Scholar
  • 16 Khan AD, Alam MN. Cosmetics and their associated adverse effects: A review. J Appl Pharm Sci Res 2019; 2: 1-6
    Google Scholar
  • 17 Singh BM, Jain A, Mishra A. Cosmetic regulations in india vs. globally and challenges in harmonization. Int J Pharm Sci Drug Res 2018; 10: 150-157
    Google Scholar
  • 18 Cho S, Oh S, Kim NI. et al. Knowledge and behavior regarding cosmetics in Koreans visiting dermatology clinics. Annals of dermatology 2017; 29: 180-186
    Google Scholar
  • 19 Nayak M, Ligade VS, Prabhu SS. Awareness level regarding adverse reactions caused by cosmetic products among female patients: A cross-sectional study. J Cosmet Dermatol 2023; 22: 2512-2519
    Google Scholar
  • 20 Bilal AI, Tilahun Z, Shimels T. et al. Cosmetics userelated adverse events and determinants among Jigjiga town residents, Eastern Ethiopia. Dermatol Ther 2017; 7: 143-153
    Google Scholar
  • 21 Bilal M, Iqbal HM. An insight into toxicity and human-health-related adverse consequences of cosmeceuticals—a review. Science of the total environment 2019; 670: 555-68.
    Google Scholar
  • 22 Huf G, Rito PD, Presgrave RD. et al. Adverse reactions to cosmetic products and the Notification System in Health Surveillance: a survey. Revista Brasileira de Epidemiologia 2013; 16: 1017-1020
    Google Scholar
  • 23 Gupta S, Kalode D, Doifode CA. A Review on Cosmetics and Their Associated Adverse Effects. International Research Journal of Modernization in Engineering Technology and Science 2023; 5: 935-947 DOI: 10.56726/irjmets33011.. 2023;
    Google Scholar
  • 24 Getachew M, Tewelde T. Cosmetic use and its adverse events among female employees of Jimma University, southwest Ethiopia. Ethiop J Health Sci 2018; 28: 717-724
    Google Scholar
  • 25 Nayak M, Prabhu SS, Sreedhar D. et al. Awareness level regarding adverse reactions caused by cosmetic products among Indian women: A cross-sectional study. Journal of Cutaneous and Aesthetic Surgery. 2023
    Google Scholar
  • 26 Toklu HZ, Antigua A, Lewis V. et al. Cosmetovigilance: A review of the current literature. Journal of family medicine and primary care 2019; 8: 1540
    Google Scholar