Increased off-target binding of [¹⁸F]florbetaben in the skull of women with reduced skull density

Abstract

Aim To investigate the relationship between off-target binding of the amyloid tracer [¹⁸F]florbetaben (FBB) in the skull and skull density.

Methods Forty-three consecutive patients were included retrospectively (age 70.2±7.5y, 42% females, 65% amyloid-positive). For each patient, CT skull density (in Hounsfield units) and (late) FBB uptake in the skull were obtained using an individual skull mask generated by warping the skull tissue probability map provided by the statistical parametric mapping software package (version SPM12) to the native patient space. Skull FBB uptake (mean of the 10% hottest voxels) was scaled to the individual median FBB uptake in the pons. The association between skull FBB uptake and skull density was tested by correlation analyses. Univariate analysis of variance (ANOVA) of skull FBB uptake with dichotomized skull density (low: ≤ median, high), sex (female, male) and amyloid-status (positive, negative) as between-subjects factors was used to assess the impact of sex and amyloid status.

Results There was a significant inverse correlation between skull FBB uptake and skull density (Pearson correlation coefficient -0.518, p < 0.001; Spearman rho -0.321, p = 0.036). The ANOVA confirmed the bone density effect on the FBB uptake in the skull (p = 0.019). In addition, sex (p = 0.012) and density*sex interaction (p = 0.016) had a significant impact. Skull FBB uptake was significantly higher in females with low skull density than for all other combinations of sex and skull density. Amyloid status did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.092).

Conclusion Off-target binding of FBB in the skull is inversely associated with skull density. The relationship is mainly driven by females. Amyloid status does not have a major impact on skull FBB binding.

Keywords

amyloid PET - off-target binding - skull - human - [¹⁸F]florbetaben

Publication History

Received: 02 November 2023

Accepted after revision: 16 January 2024

Article published online:
22 February 2024

• References

• 1 Jack CR, Bennett DA, Blennow K. et al. NIA-AA Research Framework: Toward a biological definition of Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Dement 2018; 14: 535-562 DOI: 10.1016/j.jalz.2018.02.018. (PMID: 29653606)
• 2 Barthel H, Meyer PT, Drzezga A. et al. German Society of Nuclear Medicine procedure guideline on beta-amyloid brain PET imaging. Nuklearmed-Nucl Med 2016; 55: 129-137 DOI: 10.3413/Nukmed-0816-16-04. (PMID: 27080914)
• 3 Juengling FD, Allenbach G, Bruehlmeier M. et al. Appropriate use criteria for dementia amyloid imaging in Switzerland – mini-review and statement on behalf of the Swiss Society of Nuclear Medicine and the Swiss Memory Clinics. Nuklearmedizin 2021; 60: 7-9 DOI: 10.1055/a-1277-6014. (PMID: 33080626)
• 4 Amyvid: summary of product characteristics. Accessed January 04, 2024 at: www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/product-information/amyvid-epar-product-information_en.pdf
• 5 Neuraceq: summary of product characteristics. Accessed January 04, 2024 at: www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/product-information/neuraceq-epar-product-information_en.pdf
• 6 Flores S, Chen CD, Su Y. et al. Investigating Tau and Amyloid Tracer Skull Binding in Studies of Alzheimer Disease. J Nucl Med 2023; 64: 287-293 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.122.263948. (PMID: 35953305)
• 7 Koopman D, Koerkamp MG, Jager PL. et al. Digital PET compliance to EARL accreditation specifications. Ejnmmi Phys 2017; 4 DOI: 10.1186/s40658-017-0176-5.
• 8 Zhang J, Maniawski P, Knopp MV. Performance evaluation of the next generation solid-state digital photon counting PET/CT system. Ejnmmi Res 2018; 8 DOI: 10.1186/s13550-018-0448-7. (PMID: 30402779)
• 9 Özden C, Frings L, Apostolova I. et al. FDG Uptake in the Basal Forebrain as Measured by Digital High-Resolution PET Is a Promising Marker of Basal Forebrain Degeneration in the Lewy Body Disease Spectrum A Pilot Study. Clin Nucl Med 2020; 45: 261-266 DOI: 10.1097/Rlu.0000000000002960. (PMID: 32108697)
• 10 Hu Z, Wang W, Gualtieri EE. et al. An LOR-based Fully-3D PET Image Reconstruction Using a Blob-basis Function. In: Nuclear Science Symposium Conference. M26–228. 2007
• 11 Presotto L, Iaccarino L, Sala A. et al. Low-dose CT for the spatial normalization of PET images: A validation procedure for amyloid-PET semi-quantification. Neuroimage-Clin 2018; 20: 153-160 DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2018.07.013. (PMID: 30094164)
• 12 Klunk WE, Koeppe RA, Price JC. et al. The Centiloid Project: Standardizing quantitative amyloid plaque estimation by PET. Alzheimers Dement 2015; 11: 1-15 DOI: 10.1016/j.jalz.2014.07.003. (PMID: 25443857)
• 13 Smith R, Strandberg O, Leuzy A. et al. Sex differences in off-target binding using tau positron emission tomography. Neuroimage-Clin 2021; 31 DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2021.102708.
• 14 Schulte-Geers C, Obert M, Schilling RL. et al. Age and gender-dependent bone density changes of the human skull disclosed by high-resolution flat-panel computed tomography. Int J Legal Med 2011; 125: 417-425 DOI: 10.1007/s00414-010-0544-3. (PMID: 21234583)
• 15 Turrone P, Kapur S, Seeman MV. et al. Elevation of prolactin levels by atypical antipsychotics. Am J Psychiat 2002; 159: 133-135 DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.159.1.133.
• 16 Meaney AM, Smith S, Howes OD. et al. Effects of long-term prolactin-raising antipsychotic medication on bone mineral density in patients with schizophrenia. Brit J Psychiat 2004; 184: 503-508 DOI: 10.1192/bjp.184.6.503.
• 17 Motyl KJ, Beauchemin M, Barlow D. et al. A novel role for dopamine signaling in the pathogenesis of bone loss from the atypical antipsychotic drug risperidone in female mice. Bone 2017; 103: 168-176 DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2017.07.008.
• 18 Kolabas ZI, Kuemmerle LB, Perneczky R. et al. Multi-omics and 3D-imaging reveal bone heterogeneity and unique calvaria cells in neuroinflammation (December 25, 2021). Accessed November 01, 2023 at: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.12.24.473988v1
• 19 Hatt M, Le Rest CC, Antonorsi N. et al. Radiomics in PET/CT: Current Status and Future AI-Based Evolutions. Semin Nucl Med 2020; 51: 126-133 DOI: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2020.09.002.
• 20 Komori S, Cross DJ, Mills M. et al. Deep-learning prediction of amyloid deposition from early-phase amyloid positron emission tomography imaging. Ann Nucl Med 2022; 36: 913-921 DOI: 10.1007/s12149-022-01775-z.