Download PDF
intensiv 2024; 32(02): 76-82
DOI: 10.1055/a-2240-2823
Intensivpflege
KI in der Intensivmedizin

Künstliche Intelligenz: Herausforderungen und Nutzen in der Intensivmedizin

Lukas Martin
,
Arne Peine
,
Maike Gronholz
,
Gernot Marx
,
Johannes Bickenbach
› Further Information
Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Die intensivmedizinische Arbeit ist von großen Datenmengen, deren Interpretation und Dokumentation geprägt. Künstliche Intelligenz hat vor allem in Form von maschinellem Lernen das Potenzial, diese Probleme anzugehen und zu reduzieren. KI bietet die Möglichkeit, die Arbeitsbelastung zu reduzieren, da auf ihr basierte Algorithmen Muster erkennen, Voraussagen machen und Dokumentation durch Spracherkennung erleichtern können.



Publication History

Article published online:
05 March 2024

© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Flohr L, Beaudry S, Johnson KT. et al Clinician-Driven Design of VitalPAD-An Intelligent Monitoring and Communication Device to Improve Patient Safety in the Intensive Care Unit. IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med 2018; 06: 3000114
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Beecken W-D. Changes – Analyse der Entwicklung der Digitalen Medizin im deutschen Gesundheitssystem aus ärztlicher Sicht. Matusiewicz D (ed.). Think Tanks im Gesundheitswesen. FOM-Edition. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien; 2020: 29-44
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 3 Martin L, Peine A. Was ist neu … Einsatz von künstlicher Intelligenz in der Intensivmedizin: Hype oder schon Realität?. Anaesthesist 2021; 70: 40-41
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Ahmed A, Chandra S, Herasevich V. et al The effect of two different electronic health record user interfaces on intensive care provider task load, errors of cognition, and performance. Crit Care Med 2011; 39: 1626-1634
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Ballermann MA, Shaw NT, Arbeau KJ. et al Impact of a Critical Care Clinical Information System on Interruption Rates During Intensive Care Nurse and Physician Documentation Tasks. Stud Health Technol Inform 2010; 160: 274-278
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Cheung A, van Velden FHP, Lagerburg V. et al The organizational and clinical impact of integrating bedside equipment to an information system: a systematic literature review of patient data management systems (PDMS). Int J Med Inform 2015; 84: 155-165
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Toll E. The Cost of Technology. JAMA 2020; 323: 1661-1662
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Butler R, Monsalve M, Thomas GW. et al Estimating Time Physicians and Other Health Care Workers Spend with Patients in an Intensive Care Unit Using a Sensor Network. Am J Med 2018; 131: 972.e9-972.e15
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Momenipur A, Pennathur PR. Balancing Documentation and direct patient care activities: a study of a mature electronic health record system. Int J Ind Ergon 2019; 72: 338-346
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Shanafelt TD, Dyrbye LN, Sinsky C. et al Relationship Between Clerical Burden and Characteristics of the Electronic Environment With Physician Burnout and Professional Satisfaction. Mayo Clin Proc 2016; 91: 836-848
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Beil M, Proft I, van Heerden D. et al Ethical considerations about artificial intelligence for prognostication in intensive care. Intensive Care Med Exp 2019; 07: 70
    CrossrefSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Cosgriff CV, Celi LA, Stone DJ. Critical Care, Critical Data. Biomed Eng Comput Biol 2019; 10: 1179597219856564
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 McCarthy J, Minsky ML, Rochester N. et al A Proposal for the Dartmouth Summer Research Project on Artificial Intelligence. AI Magazine 2006; 27: 12-14
    CrossrefSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Peine A, Lütge C, Poszler F. et al Künstliche Intelligenz und maschinelles Lernen in der intensivmedizinischen Forschung und klinischen Anwendung. Anästh Intensivmed 2020; 61: 372-384
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 15 Bini SA. Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, Deep Learning, and Cognitive Computing: What Do These Terms Mean and How Will They Impact Health Care?. J Arthroplasty 2018; 33: 2358-2361
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Cleophas TJ, Zwinderman AH. Machine Learning in Medicine – a complete Overview. Cham; Heidelberg: Springer International Publishing; 2015
    CrossrefSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Schmidhuber J. Deep learning in neural networks: an overview. Neural Networks 2015; 61: 85-117
    CrossrefSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Arntfield R, Wu D, Tschirhart J. et al Automation of Lung Ultrasound Interpretation via Deep Learning for the Classification of Normal versus Abnormal Lung Parenchyma: A Multicenter Study. Diagnostics (Basel) 2021; 11: 2049
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Esteva A, Kuprel B, Novoa RA. et al Dermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks. Nature 2017; 542: 115-118
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Tai Y, Wei L, Zhou H. et al Machine learning-based haptic-enabled surgical navigation with security awareness. Concurrency Computat Pract Exper 2019; 31: 1-12
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 21 Davoudi A, Malhotra KR, Shickel B. et al Intelligent ICU for Autonomous Patient Monitoring Using Pervasive Sensing and Deep Learning. Sci Rep 2019; 09: 8020
    CrossrefSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Greco M, Caruso PF, Cecconi M. Artificial Intelligence in the Intensive Care Unit. Semin Respir Crit Care Med 2021; 42: 2-9
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Koczulla AR, Wöhrle H. Digitale Medizin auf der Intensivstation. Pneumologe 2020; 17: 264-266
    CrossrefSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 Collins S, Couture B, Kang MJ. et al Quantifying and Visualizing Nursing Flowsheet Documentation Burden in Acute and Critical Care. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2018; 2018: 348-357
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 25 Johnson AEW, Pollard TJ, Shen L. et al MIMIC-III, a freely accessible critical care database. Sci Data 2016; 03: 160035
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 26 Pollard TJ, Johnson AEW, Raffa JD. et al The eICU Collaborative Research Database, a freely available multi-center database for critical care research. Sci Data 2018; 05: 180178
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 27 Anonymous Medicine in the digital age. Nat Med 2019; 25: 1
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 28 Dymek C, Kim B, Melton GB. et al Building the evidence-base to reduce electronic health record-related clinician burden. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2021; 28: 1057-1061
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 29 Goss FR, Blackley SV, Ortega CA. et al A clinician survey of using speech recognition for clinical documentation in the electronic health record. Int J Med Inform 2019; 130: 103938
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 30 Slutsky AS, Ranieri VM. Ventilator-induced lung injury. N Engl J Med 2013; 369: 2126-2136
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 31 Komorowski M, Celi LA, Badawi O. et al The Artificial Intelligence Clinician learns optimal treatment strategies for sepsis in intensive care. Nature Med 2018; 24: 1716-1720
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 32 Jansson M, Rubio J, Gavaldà R. et al Artificial Intelligence for clinical decision support in Critical Care, required and accelerated by COVID-19. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med 2020; 39: 691-693
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 33 Pirracchio R, Cohen MJ, Malenica I. et al Big data and targeted machine learning in action to assist medical decision in the ICU. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med 2019; 38: 377-384
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 34 Peine A, Hallawa A, Bickenbach J. et al Development and validation of a reinforcement learning algorithm to dynamically Martin L, et al. Künstliche Intelligenz: Herausforderungen … Anästhesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed 206 Schmerzther. 2022; 57: 199-209 | © 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved. CME-Fortbildung | Topthema Heruntergeladen von: Thieme Gruppe. Urheberrechtlich geschützt. optimize mechanical ventilation in critical care. NPJ Digit Med 2021; 4: 32. doi:10.1038/s41746-021-00388-6
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 35 Marx G, Dusch M, Czaplik M. et al Telemedizin für die vier Säulen der Anästhesiologie: Positionspapier der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin (DGAI) und der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Telemedizin (DG Telemed). Anästh Intensivmed 2019; 60: 191-207
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 36 Lin Y-W, Zhou Y, Faghri F. et al Analysis and prediction of unplanned intensive care unit readmission using recurrent neural networks with long short-term memory. PLoS One 2019; 14: e0218942
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 37 Sim I, Gorman P, Greenes RA. et al Clinical decision support systems for the practice of evidence-based medicine. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2001; 08: 527-534
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 38 Rawson TM, Moore LSP, Hernandez B. et al A systematic review of clinical decision support systems for antimicrobial management: are we failing to investigate these interventions appropriately?. Clin Microbiol Infect 2017; 23: 524-532
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 39 Rawson TM, Ahmad R, Toumazou C. et al Artificial intelligence can improve decision-making in infection management. Nat Hum Behav 2019; 03: 543-545
    CrossrefSearch in Google Scholar
  • 40 Loo TS, Davis RB, Lipsitz LA. et al Electronic medical record reminders and panel management to improve primary care of elderly patients. Arch Intern Med 2011; 171: 1552-1558
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 41 McGinn TG, McCullagh L, Kannry J. et al Efficacy of an evidence- based clinical decision support in primary care practices: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med 2013; 173: 1584-1591
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 42 Chertow GM, Lee J, Kuperman GJ. et al Guided medication dosing for inpatients with renal insufficiency. JAMA 2001; 286: 2839-2844
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 43 Wright A, Pang J, Feblowitz JC. et al Improving completeness of electronic problem lists through clinical decision support: a randomized, controlled trial. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2012; 19: 555-561
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 44 Abràmoff MD, Lavin PT, Birch M. et al Pivotal trial of an autonomous AI-based diagnostic system for detection of diabetic retinopathy in primary care offices. NPJ Digit Med 2018; 01: 39
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 45 Corny J, Rajkumar A, Martin O. et al A machine learning-based clinical decision support system to identify prescriptions with a high risk of medication error. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2020; 27: 1688-1694
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 46 Cabitza F, Rasoini R, Gensini GF. Unintended Consequences of Machine Learning in Medicine. JAMA 2017; 318: 517-518
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 47 Peiffer-Smadja N, Rawson TM, Ahmad R. et al Machine learning for clinical decision support in infectious diseases: a narrative review of current applications. Clin Microbiol Infect 2020; 26: 584-595
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 48 McCoy AB, Thomas EJ, Krousel-Wood M. et al Clinical decision support alert appropriateness: a review and proposal for improvement. Ochsner J 2014; 14: 195-202
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 49 Asan O, Smith PD, Montague E. More screen time, less face time – implications for EHR design. J Eval Clin Pract 2014; 20: 896-901
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 50 Margalit RS, Roter D, Dunevant MA. et al Electronic medical record use and physician-patient communication: an observational study of Israeli primary care encounters. Patient Educ Couns 2006; 61: 134-141
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 51 Kwan JL, Lo L, Ferguson J. et al Computerised clinical decision support systems and absolute improvements in care: metaanalysis of controlled clinical trials. BMJ 2020; 370: m3216
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 52 He J, Baxter SL, Xu J. et al The practical implementation of artificial intelligence technologies in medicine. Nat Med 2019; 25: 30-36
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 53 Muinga N, Abejirinde IO, Paton C. et al Designing paper-based records to improve the quality of nursing documentation in hospitals: A scoping review. J Clin Nurs 2021; 30: 56-71
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 54 Chao C-A. The impact of electronic health records on collaborative work routines: A narrative network analysis. Int J Med Inform 2016; 94: 100-111
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 55 Hodgson T, Magrabi F, Coiera E. Efficiency and safety of speech recognition for documentation in the electronic health record. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2017; 24: 1127-1133
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 56 Zuchowski M. Weniger Dokumentationsaufwand, mehr Zeit. Klinik Management aktuell 2020; 25: 72-73
    Thieme ConnectSearch in Google Scholar
  • 57 Blackley SV, Schubert VD, Goss FR. et al Physician use of speech recognition versus typing in clinical documentation: A controlled observational study. Int J Med Inform 2020; 141: 104178
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 58 Panch T, Mattie H, Celi LA. The “inconvenient truth” about AI in healthcare. NPJ Digit Med 2019; 77: 1-3 746–019–0155–4
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 59 Gijsberts CM, Groenewegen KA, Hoefer IE. et al Race/Ethnic Differences in the Associations of the Framingham Risk Factors with Carotid IMT and Cardiovascular Events. PLoS One 2015; 10: e0132321
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 60 Tran BD, Chen Y, Liu S. et al How does medical scribes’ work inform development of speech-based clinical documentation technologies? A systematic review. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2020; 27: 808-817
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 61 Poncette A-S, Spies C, Mosch L. et al Clinical Requirements of Future Patient Monitoring in the Intensive Care Unit: Qualitative Study. JMIR Med Inform 2019; 07: e13064
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 62 U. S. Food, and, Drug Administration. Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Software as a Medical Device. Zugriff am 01.11.2021 unter www.fda.gov/medical-devices/softwaremedical-device-samd/artificial-intelligence-and-machine-learning-software-medical-device