Download PDF
Int J Sports Med 2024; 45(04): 282-291
DOI: 10.1055/a-2123-0851
Training & Testing

Effects of 24-week Polarized Training vs. Threshold Training in Obese Male Adults

Mattia D’Alleva 
1   Deparment of Medicine, University of Udine, Udine, Italy
2   School of Sport Sciences, University of Udine, Udine, Italy
,
Nicola Giovanelli 
1   Deparment of Medicine, University of Udine, Udine, Italy
2   School of Sport Sciences, University of Udine, Udine, Italy
,
Francesco Graniero
3   Physical Exercise Prescription Center, Azienda sanitaria universitaria Friuli Centrale, Gemona del Friuli, Italy
,
Veronique Louise Billat
4   STAPS, Universite d’Evry-Val-d’Essonne, Evry, France
,
Federica Fiori
1   Deparment of Medicine, University of Udine, Udine, Italy
,
Michela Marinoni
1   Deparment of Medicine, University of Udine, Udine, Italy
,
Maria Parpinel
1   Deparment of Medicine, University of Udine, Udine, Italy
,
Stefano Lazzer
1   Deparment of Medicine, University of Udine, Udine, Italy
2   School of Sport Sciences, University of Udine, Udine, Italy
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

The combination of high volume of moderate-intensity continuous training with a low volume of high-intensity interval training improved body composition and physical capacities in individuals with obesity. However, polarized training (POL) has never been used in adult men with obesity. Thus, the purpose of this study was to investigate changes in body composition and physical capacities induced by a 24-week POL or threshold (THR) program in obese male adults. Twenty male patients (mean age 39.8±6.3 yrs; mean body mass index [BMI] 31.6±2.7 kg∙m−2) participated in this study (n: 10 POL, n: 10 THR). After 24-week, body mass (BM) and fat mass (FM) decreased by -3.20±3.10 kg (P<0.05) and -3.80±2.80 kg (P<0.05), respectively, similarly in both groups. Maximal oxygen uptake (  ̇VO2max) and   ̇VO2 at respiratory compensation point (RCP) increased in the POL group (+8.5±12.2 and+9.0±17.0%, P<0.05) and in the THR group (+4.24±8.64 and+4.0±6.70%, P<0.05), as well   ̇VO2 at gas exchange threshold (GET) increased similarly in both groups (+12.8±12.0%, P<0.05). POL and THR were equally effective in improving body composition and physical capacities in obese subjects. Future studies are needed to determine whether adherence to the training program can be improved by adding a running competition compared with a group without competition at the end of the training program.

Key words

body composition - endurance - obesity - polarized training - threshold training

Supplementary material



Publication History

Received: 25 March 2023

Accepted: 04 July 2023

Accepted Manuscript online:
04 July 2023

Article published online:
24 January 2024

© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • References

  • 1 Guthold R, Stevens GA, Riley LM. et al. Worldwide trends in insufficient physical activity from 2001 to 2016: A pooled analysis of 358 population-based surveys with 1.9 million participants. Lancet Glob Health 2018; 6: e1077-e1086
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Cancela Carral JM, Ayán C, Sturzinger L. et al. Global trends in child obesity: are figures converging?. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020; 6: 1309-1319
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Lin X, Zhang X, Guo J. et al. Effects of exercise training on cardiorespiratory fitness and biomarkers of cardiometabolic health: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Am Heart Assoc 2015; 4: e002014
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Zhou N. Assessment of aerobic exercise capacity in obesity, which expression of oxygen uptake is the best?. Sports Med Health Sci 2021; 3: 138-147
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Maciejczyk M, Wiecek M, Szymura J. et al. Effect of body composition on respiratory compensation point during an incremental test. J Strength Cond Res 2014; 28: 2071-2077
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Guio de Prada V, Ortega JF, Ramirez-Jimenez M. et al. Training intensity relative to ventilatory thresholds determines cardiorespiratory fitness improvements in sedentary adults with obesity. Eur J Sport Sci 2019; 19: 549-556
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Gaesser GA, Angadi SS. Obesity treatment: Weight loss versus increasing fitness and physical activity for reducing health risks. iScience 2021; 24: 102995
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Petridou A, Siopi A, Mougios V. Exercise in the management of obesity. Metabolism 2019; 92: 163-169
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Rugbeer N, Constantinou D, Torres G. Comparison of high-intensity training versus moderate-intensity continuous training on cardiorespiratory fitness and body fat percentage in persons with overweight or obesity: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Phys Act Health 2021; 18: 610-623
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 MacInnis MJ, Gibala MJ. Physiological adaptations to interval training and the role of exercise intensity. J Physiol 2017; 595: 2915-2930
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Su L, Fu J, Sun S. et al. Effects of HIIT and MICT on cardiovascular risk factors in adults with overweight and/or obesity: A meta-analysis. PLoS One 2019; 14: e0210644
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Andreato LV, Esteves JV, Coimbra DR. et al. The influence of high-intensity interval training on anthropometric variables of adults with overweight or obesity: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Obes Rev 2019; 20: 142-155
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Keating SE, Johnson NA, Mielke GI. et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of interval training versus moderate-intensity continuous training on body adiposity. Obes Rev 2017; 18: 943-964
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Seiler S. What is best practice for training intensity and duration distribution in endurance athletes?. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 2010; 5: 276-291
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Rosenblat MA, Perrotta AS, Vicenzino B. Polarized vs. threshold training intensity distribution on endurance sport performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Strength Cond Res 2019; 33: 3491-3500
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Kim TH, Han JK, Lee JY. et al. The effect of polarized training on the athletic performance of male and female cross-country skiers during the general preparation period. Healthcare (Switzerland) 2021; 9: 1-11
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Poon ET-C, Siu PM-F, Wongpipit W. et al. Alternating high-intensity interval training and continuous training is efficacious in improving cardiometabolic health in obese middle-aged men. J Exerc Sci Fit 2022; 20: 40-47
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 D’Alleva M, Vaccari F, Graniero F. et al. Effects of 12-week combined training versus high intensity interval training on cardiorespiratory fitness, body composition and fat metabolism in obese male adults. J Exerc Sci Fit 2023; 21: 193-201
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Meyer T, Lucía A, Earnest CP. et al. A conceptual framework for performance diagnosis and training prescription from submaximal gas exchange parameters - Theory and application. Int J Sports Med 2005; 26: S38-S48
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Stöggl TL, Sperlich B. The training intensity distribution among well-trained and elite endurance athletes. Front Physiol 2015; 6: 295
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Streb AR, dos Santos Leonel L, Delevatti RS. et al. Effects of non-periodized and linear periodized combined exercise training on insulin resistance indicators in adults with obesity: A randomized controlled trial. Sports Med Open 2021; 7: 1-7
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Collins KA, Huffman KM, Wolever RQ. et al. Determinants of dropout from and variation in adherence to an exercise intervention: the strride randomized trials. Transl J Am Coll Sports Med 2022; 7: 1-8
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Keytsman C, Van Noten P, Spaas J. et al. Periodized home-based training: A new strategy to improve high intensity exercise therapy adherence in mildly affected patients with multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler Relat Disord 2019; 28: 91-97
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Campos Y, Casado A, Vieira JG. et al. Training-intensity distribution on middle- and long-distance runners: A systematic review. Int J Sports Med 2022; 43: 305-316
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Molinari CA, Palacin F, Poinsard L. et al. Determination of submaximal and maximal training zones from a 3-stage, variable-duration, perceptually regulated track test. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 2020; 15: 853-861
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Stone MH, Hornsby WG, Haff GG. et al. Periodization and block periodization in sports: Emphasis on strength-power training – A provocative and challenging narrative. J Strength Cond Res 2021; 35: 2351-2371
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Stöggl T, Sperlich B. Polarized training has greater impact on key endurance variables than threshold, high intensity, or high volume training. Front Physiol 2014; 5: 33
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 CREA. Linee guida per la sana alimentazone (Revisione 2018). 2019
    PubMed
  • 29 Bellinger P, Arnold B, Minahan C. Quantifying the training-intensity distribution in middle-distance runners: The influence of different methods of training-intensity quantification. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 2020; 15: 319-323
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Treff G, Winkert K, Sareban M. et al. The polarization-index: A simple calculation to distinguish polarized from non-polarized training intensity distributions. Front Physiol 2019; 10: 707
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Foster C, Florhaug JA, Franklin J. et al. A new approach to monitoring exercise training. J Strength Cond Res 2001; 15: 109-115
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Borg G. Perceived exertion as an indicator of somatic stress. Scand J Rehabil Med 1970; 2: 92-98
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Kagawa M, Byrne NM, Hills AP. Comparison of body fat estimation using waist:height ratio using different “waist” measurements in Australian adults. Br J Nutr 2008; 100: 1135-1141
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Lukaski HC. Methods for the assessment of human body composition: Traditional and new. Am J Clin Nutr 1987; 46: 537-556
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Gray DS, Bray GA, Gemayel N. et al. Effect of obesity on bioelectrical impedance. Am J Clin Nutr 1989; 50: 255-260
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Beaver WL, Wasserman K, Whipp BJ. A new method for detecting anaerobic threshold by gas exchange. J Appl Physiol 1985; 1986: 2020-2027
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Howley ET, Bassett DRJ, Welch HG. Criteria for maximal oxygen uptake: Review and commentary. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1995; 27: 1292-1301
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Vaccari F, Passaro A, D’Amuri A. et al. Effects of 3-month high-intensity interval training vs. moderate endurance training and 4-month follow-up on fat metabolism, cardiorespiratory function and mitochondrial respiration in obese adults. Eur J Appl Physiol 2020; 120: 1787-1803
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Lakens D. Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: A practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs. Front Psychol 2013; 4: 1-12
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed.. Routledge; 1988
    Google Scholar
  • 41 Williamson DA, Bray GA, Ryan DH. Is 5% weight loss a satisfactory criterion to define clinically significant weight loss?. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2015; 23: 2319-2320
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Bellicha A, van Baak MA, Battista F. et al. Effect of exercise training on weight loss, body composition changes, and weight maintenance in adults with overweight or obesity: An overview of 12 systematic reviews and 149 studies. Obesity Reviews 2021; 22: 1-13
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Pérez A, Ramos-Campo DJ, Freitas TT. et al. Effect of two different intensity distribution training programmes on aerobic and body composition variables in ultra-endurance runners. Eur J Sport Sci 2019; 19: 636-644
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Murray B, Rosenbloom C. Fundamentals of glycogen metabolism for coaches and athletes. Nutr Rev 2018; 76: 243-259
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Georgiev A, Granata C, Roden M. The role of mitochondria in the pathophysiology and treatment of common metabolic diseases in humans. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 2022; 322: C1248-C1259
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Reljic D, Frenk F, Herrmann HJ. et al. Effects of very low volume high intensity versus moderate intensity interval training in obese metabolic syndrome patients: A randomized controlled study. Sci Rep 2021; 11: 1-14
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Gaskill SE, Walker AJ, Serfass RA. et al. Changes in ventilatory threshold with exercise training in a sedentary population: The HERITAGE Family Study. Int J Sports Med 2001; 22: 586-592
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Granata C, Jamnick NA, Bishop DJ. Training-induced changes in mitochondrial content and respiratory function in human skeletal muscle. Sports Med 2018; 48: 1809-1828
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Purdom T, Kravitz L, Dokladny K. et al. Understanding the factors that effect maximal fat oxidation. J Int Soc Sports Nutr 2018; 15: 1-10
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Bathgate KE, Bagley JR, Jo E. et al. Muscle health and performance in monozygotic twins with 30 years of discordant exercise habits. Eur J Appl Physiol 2018; 118: 2097-2110
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 van der Zwaard S, Brocherie F, Jaspers RT. Under the Hood: Skeletal Muscle Determinants of Endurance Performance. Front Sports Act Living 2021; 3: 1-11
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Mitchell EA, Martin NRW, Bailey SJ. et al. Critical power is positively related to skeletal muscle capillarity and type I muscle fibers in endurance-trained individuals. J Appl Physiol (1985) 2018; 125: 737-745
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 Esteve-Lanao J, Foster C, Seiler S. et al. Impact of training intensity distribution on performance in endurance athletes. J Strength Cond Res 2007; 21: 943-949
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 54 Zapata-Lamana R, Henríquez-Olguín C, Burgos C. et al. Effects of polarized training on cardiometabolic risk factors in young overweight and obese women: A randomized-controlled trial. Front Physiol 2018; 9: 1287
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 55 Wagner PD. Systemic oxygen transport and utilization. J Breath Res 2008; 2: 24001
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 56 Van Ryckeghem L, Keytsman C, De Brandt J. et al. Impact of continuous vs. interval training on oxygen extraction and cardiac function during exercise in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Eur J Appl Physiol 2022; 122: 875-887
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 57 Perna S, Salman M, Gasparri C. et al. Two, six, and twelve-month dropout rate and predictor factors after a multidisciplinary residential program for obesity treatment. A prospective cohort study. Front Nutr 2022; 9: 851802
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 58 Peterson B, Hawke F, Spink M. et al. Biomechanical and musculoskeletal measurements as risk factors for running-related injury in non-elite runners: A systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies. Sports Med Open 2022; 8
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 59 Bertelsen ML, Hansen M, Rasmussen S. et al. The start-to-run distance and running-related injury among obese novice runners: A randomized trial. Int J Sports Phys Ther 2018; 13: 943-955
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 60 Damsted C, Parner ET, Sørensen H. et al. ProjectRun21: Do running experience and running pace influence the risk of running injury–A 14-week prospective cohort study. J Sci Med Sport 2019; 22: 281-287
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar