Endoscopy 2023; 55(08): 701-708
DOI: 10.1055/a-2031-0691
Original article

Deep learning-based clinical decision support system for gastric neoplasms in real-time endoscopy: development and validation study

Eun Jeong Gong
1   Department of Internal Medicine, Hallym University College of Medicine, Chuncheon, South Korea
2   Institute for Liver and Digestive Diseases, Hallym University, Chuncheon, South Korea
3   Institute of New Frontier Research, Hallym University College of Medicine, Chuncheon, South Korea
,
1   Department of Internal Medicine, Hallym University College of Medicine, Chuncheon, South Korea
2   Institute for Liver and Digestive Diseases, Hallym University, Chuncheon, South Korea
3   Institute of New Frontier Research, Hallym University College of Medicine, Chuncheon, South Korea
4   Division of Big Data and Artificial Intelligence, Chuncheon Sacred Heart Hospital, South Korea
,
Jae Jun Lee
3   Institute of New Frontier Research, Hallym University College of Medicine, Chuncheon, South Korea
4   Division of Big Data and Artificial Intelligence, Chuncheon Sacred Heart Hospital, South Korea
5   Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Hallym University College of Medicine, Chuncheon, South Korea
,
Gwang Ho Baik
1   Department of Internal Medicine, Hallym University College of Medicine, Chuncheon, South Korea
2   Institute for Liver and Digestive Diseases, Hallym University, Chuncheon, South Korea
,
Hyun Lim
1   Department of Internal Medicine, Hallym University College of Medicine, Chuncheon, South Korea
2   Institute for Liver and Digestive Diseases, Hallym University, Chuncheon, South Korea
,
Jae Hoon Jeong
6   AIDOT Inc., Seoul, South Korea
,
Sung Won Choi
6   AIDOT Inc., Seoul, South Korea
,
Joonhee Cho
6   AIDOT Inc., Seoul, South Korea
,
Deok Yeol Kim
6   AIDOT Inc., Seoul, South Korea
,
Kang Bin Lee
6   AIDOT Inc., Seoul, South Korea
,
Seung-Il Shin
6   AIDOT Inc., Seoul, South Korea
,
6   AIDOT Inc., Seoul, South Korea
,
Byeong In Moon
6   AIDOT Inc., Seoul, South Korea
,
Sung Chul Park
7   Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon, South Korea
,
Sang Hoon Lee
7   Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon, South Korea
,
Ki Bae Bang
8   Department of Internal Medicine, Dankook University College of Medicine, Cheonan, South Korea
,
Dae-Soon Son
9   Division of Data Science, Data Science Convergence Research Center, Hallym University, Chuncheon, South Korea
› Author Affiliations
Supported by: 2020 Olympus Korea grant from the Korean Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Research Foundation 2020

Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Registration number (trial ID): NCT05452473 Type of study: Randomized study

Abstract

Background Deep learning models have previously been established to predict the histopathology and invasion depth of gastric lesions using endoscopic images. This study aimed to establish and validate a deep learning-based clinical decision support system (CDSS) for the automated detection and classification (diagnosis and invasion depth prediction) of gastric neoplasms in real-time endoscopy.

Methods The same 5017 endoscopic images that were employed to establish previous models were used for the training data. The primary outcomes were: (i) the lesion detection rate for the detection model, and (ii) the lesion classification accuracy for the classification model. For performance validation of the lesion detection model, 2524 real-time procedures were tested in a randomized pilot study. Consecutive patients were allocated either to CDSS-assisted or conventional screening endoscopy. The lesion detection rate was compared between the groups. For performance validation of the lesion classification model, a prospective multicenter external test was conducted using 3976 novel images from five institutions.

Results The lesion detection rate was 95.6 % (internal test). On performance validation, CDSS-assisted endoscopy showed a higher lesion detection rate than conventional screening endoscopy, although statistically not significant (2.0 % vs. 1.3 %; P = 0.21) (randomized study). The lesion classification rate was 89.7 % in the four-class classification (advanced gastric cancer, early gastric cancer, dysplasia, and non-neoplastic) and 89.2 % in the invasion depth prediction (mucosa confined or submucosa invaded; internal test). On performance validation, the CDSS reached 81.5 % accuracy in the four-class classification and 86.4 % accuracy in the binary classification (prospective multicenter external test).

Conclusions The CDSS demonstrated its potential for real-life clinical application and high performance in terms of lesion detection and classification of detected lesions in the stomach.

Figs. 1 s–6 s, Table 1 s



Publication History

Received: 03 September 2022

Accepted after revision: 08 February 2023

Accepted Manuscript online:
08 February 2023

Article published online:
17 April 2023

© 2023. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 
  • References

  • 1 Cho BJ, Bang CS, Park SW. et al. Automated classification of gastric neoplasms in endoscopic images using a convolutional neural network. Endoscopy 2019; 51: 1121-1129
  • 2 Cho BJ, Bang CS. Artificial intelligence for the determination of a management strategy for diminutive colorectal polyps: hype, hope, or help. Am J Gastroenterol 2020; 115: 70-72
  • 3 Cho BJ, Bang CS, Lee JJ. et al. Prediction of submucosal invasion for gastric neoplasms in endoscopic images using deep-learning. J Clin Med 2020; 9: 1858
  • 4 Park CH, Yang DH, Kim JW. et al. Clinical practice guideline for endoscopic resection of early gastrointestinal cancer. Clin Endosc 2020; 53: 142-166
  • 5 Kaltenbach T, Anderson JC, Burke CA. et al. Endoscopic removal of colorectal lesions recommendations by the US Multi-society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Gastroenterology 2020; 158: 1095-1129
  • 6 Bang CS, Lee JJ, Baik GH. Computer-aided diagnosis of esophageal cancer and neoplasms in endoscopic images: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy. Gastrointest Endosc 2020; 93: 1006-1015.e13
  • 7 Bang CS, Lee JJ, Baik GH. Artificial intelligence for the prediction of Helicobacter pylori infection in endoscopic images: systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy. J Med Internet Res 2020; 22: e21983
  • 8 Berzin TM, Parasa S, Wallace MB. et al. Position statement on priorities for artificial intelligence in GI endoscopy: a report by the ASGE Task Force. Gastrointest Endosc 2020; 92: 951-959
  • 9 Yang YJ, Bang CS. Application of artificial intelligence in gastroenterology. World J Gastroenterol 2019; 25: 1666-1683
  • 10 Bang CS. Deep learning in upper gastrointestinal disorders: status and future perspectives. Korean J Gastroenterol 2020; 75: 120-131
  • 11 Bang CS AJ, Kim JH, Kim YI. et al. Establishing machine learning models to predict curative resection in early gastric cancer with undifferentiated histology: development and usability study. J Med Internet Res 2021; 23: e25053
  • 12 Bang CS LH, Jeong HM, Hwang SH. Use of endoscopic images in the prediction of submucosal invasion of gastric neoplasms: automated deep learning model development and usability study. J Med Internet Res 2021; 23: e25167
  • 13 Abadir AP, Ali MF, Karnes W. et al. Artificial intelligence in gastrointestinal endoscopy. Clin Endosc 2020; 53: 132-141
  • 14 Hasan SMK, Linte CA. A modified U-Net Convolutional Network featuring a nearest-neighbor re-sampling-based elastic-transformation for brain tissue characterization and segmentation. Proc IEEE West N Y Image Signal Process Workshop 2018; DOI: 10.1109/WNYIPW.2018.8576421.
  • 15 Huang G, Liu Z, Weinberger KQ. Densely connected convolutional networks. Computing Research Repository 2016; DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.1608.06993.
  • 16 van Rossum G, Drake Jr. FL. Python reference manual. 1995 Available at (Accessed: 02.03.2023): https://ir.cwi.nl/pub/5008
  • 17 Hipp RD. SQLite. 2020 Available at (Accessed 20.02.2023): https://www.sqlite.org/index.html
  • 18 Redmon J, Farhadi AJapa. Yolov3: An incremental improvement. 2018 Available at (Accessed 02.03.2023): https://arxiv.org/pdf/1804.02767.pdf
  • 19 Tan M, Le Q. EfficientNet: Rethinking model scaling for convolutional neural networks. International Conference on Machine Learning. 2019 Available at (Accessed 02.03.2023): https://arxiv.org/pdf/1905.11946.pdf
  • 20 He K, Zhang X, Ren S. et al. Deep residual learning for image recognition. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 27–30 June 2016. 2016
  • 21 Pedregosa F, Varoquaux G, Gramfort A. et al. Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python. J Mach Learn Res 2011; 12: 2825-2830
  • 22 Li YD, Li HZ, Chen SS. et al. Correlation of the detection rate of upper GI cancer with artificial intelligence score: results from a multicenter trial (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2022; 95: 1138-1146.e2
  • 23 Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D. CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. Trials 2010; 11: 32
  • 24 Jang ES, Park SM, Park YS. et al. Work-life conflict and its health effects on Korean gastroenterologists according to age and sex. Dig Dis Sci 2020; 65: 86-95