Download PDF
veterinär spiegel 2023; 33(01): 28-33
DOI: 10.1055/a-1971-0976
Nutztiere & Pferde

Die Diarrhoe des Ferkels – der Klassiker unter den „Kinderkrankheiten“ des Schweines

Caroline Klein
› Further Information
Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints All articles of this category

Magen-Darm-Erkrankungen des Saugferkels mit Diarrhoe gehören zu den „Klassikern“ im Schweinestall. Dennoch sollte gerade diese Kinderkrankheit nicht unterschätzt werden, denn der Einfluss auf die ökonomischen Zahlen des Betriebs sind enorm. Lesen Sie, welche Aspekte für die Ferkelgesundheit wichtig sind.

Literaturverzeichnis als PDF



Publication History

Article published online:
16 March 2023

© 2023. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Schmitz S. Durchfall. In: Neiger R. Hrsg. Differenzialdiagnosen Innere Medizin Hund und Katze. 3. Aufl.. Stuttgart: Thieme; 2019
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Wendt M, Epe C, Grummer B. et al. Diagnostik, Prophylaxe und Therapie von Erkrankungen des Verdauungstraktes in Schweinebeständen. In: Grosse Beilage E, Wendt M. Hrsg Diagnostik und Gesundheitsmanagement im Schweinebestand. 1. Aufl.. Stuttgart: Ulmer; 2013: 271-349
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Reiner G. Krankheiten des Verdauungstraktes. In: Reiner G. Hrsg. Krankes Schwein – kranker Bestand. 1. Aufl.. Stuttgart: Ulmer; 2015: 128-164
    Google Scholar
  • 4 Rhouma M, Beaudry F, Thériault W. et al. Colistin in Pig Production: Chemistry, Mechanism of Antibacterial Action, Microbial Resistance Emergence, and One Health Perspectives. Front Microbiol 2016; 7: 1789
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Abd El-Gawad El-Sayed Ahmed M, Zhong MLL, Shen C. et al. Colistin and its role in the Era of antibiotic resistance: an extended review (2000–2019). Emerg Microb Infect 2020; 9 (01) 868-885
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Nguyet LTK, Keeratikunakorn K, Kaeoket K. et al. Antibiotic resistant Escherichia coli from diarrheic piglets from pig farms in Thailand that harbor colistin-resistant mcr genes. Sci Rep 2022; 12: 9083
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Bundestierärztekammer e.V.. Die neue TÄHAV ist in Kraft. DTB 2018; 66
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Theil PK, Lauridsen C, Quesnel H. Neonatal piglet survival: Impact of sow nutrition around parturition on fetal glycogen deposition and production and composition of colostrum and transient milk. Animal 2014.
    Google Scholar
  • 9 Herpin P, Damon M, Le Dividich J. Development of thermoregulation and neonatal survival in pigs. Livest Prod Sci 2002; 78: 25-455
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Edwards SA. Perinatal mortality in the pig: Environmental or physiological solutions?. Livest Prod Sci 2002; 78: 3-12
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Richter T, Karrer M. Grundsätze der Nutztierhaltung. In: Richter T. Hrsg. Krankheitsursache Haltung: Beurteilung von Nutztierställen. 1. Aufl.. Stuttgart: Ulmer; 2006
    Google Scholar
  • 12 Tucker BS, Petrovski KR, Kirkwood RN. Neonatal Piglet Temperature Changes: Effect of Intraperitoneal Warm Saline Injection. Animals (Basel) 2022; 12 (10) 1312
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Niestrath M, Takla M, Joachim A. et al. The role of Isospora suis as a Pathogen in Conventional Piglet Production in Germany. J Vet Med B Infect Dis Vet Public Health 2002; 49 (04) 176-180
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Fairbrother JM, Nadeau E. Colibacillosis. In: Zimmerman JJ, Karriker LA, Ramirez A. et al., Hrsg. Diseases of swine. 11. Aufl.. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell; 2019: 807-834
    Google Scholar
  • 15 Müller K, Sonntag S. DLG-Merkblatt 370: Management großer Würfe. 1. Aufl.. Frankfurt/Main: DLG e. V.; 2012
    Google Scholar
  • 16 Inoue R, Tsukahara T. Composition and physiological functions of the porcine colostrum. J Anim Sci 2021; 92 (01) e13618
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Le Dividich J, Rooke JA, Herpin P. Nutritional and immunological importance of colostrum for the new-born pig. J Agric Sci 2005; DOI: 10.1017/S0021859605005642.
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Alexopoulos JG, Lines DS, Hallett S. et al. A Review of Success Factors for Piglet Fostering in Lactation. Animals (Basel) 2018; 8 (03) 38
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Antonczyk C. Untersuchungen zu Energie- und Nährstoffgehalten in der Frucht- und Plazentamasse zum Zeitpunkt der Geburt bei Sauen mit hoher Reproduktionsleistung. Hannover: Diss. Vet. Med; 2017
    Google Scholar
  • 20 Cabrera RA, Lin X, Campbell JM. et al. Influence of birth order, birth weight, colostrum and serum immunoglobulin G on neonatal piglet survival. J Anim Sci Biotechnol 2012; 3 (01) 42
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Manjarín RM, Montano YA, Kirkwood RN. et al. Effect of piglet separation from dam at birth on colostrum uptake. Can J Vet Res 2018; 82 (03) 239-242
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Milon A, Aumaitre A, Le Dividich J. et al. Influence of birth prematurity on colostrum composition and subsequent immunity of piglets. Animal de Recherch Vet 1983; 14: 533-550
    Google Scholar
  • 23 Sponseller JK, Steele KA, Schmidt DJ. et al. Hyperimmune Bovine Colostrum as a Novel Therapy to Combat Clostridium difficile Infection. J Infect Dis 2015; 211 (08) 1334-1341
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Sugiharto S, Poulsen ASR, Canibe N. et al. Effect of bovine colostrum feeding in comparison with milk replacer and natural feeding on the immune responses and colonisation of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli in the intestinal tissue of piglets. Br J Nutr 2015; 113 (06) 923-934
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Matías M, Berzosa M, Pastor Y. et al. Maternal Vaccination. Immunization of Sows during Pregnancy against ETEC Infections. Vaccines (Basel) 2017; 5 (04) 48
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Hedegaard CJ, Heegaard PMH. Passive immunisation, an old idea revisited: Basic principles and application to modern animal production systems. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 2016; 174: 50-63
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Bandrick M, Pieters M, Pijoan C. et al. Effect of cross-fostering on transfer of maternal immunity to mycoplasma hyopneumoniae to piglets. Vet Rec 2011.
    Google Scholar
  • 28 Huting AMS, Almond K, Wellock I. et al. What is good for small piglets might not be good for big piglets: The consequences of cross-fostering and creep feed provision on performance to slaughter. J Anim Sci 2017.
    Google Scholar
  • 29 Reese D, Straw B. The Case against Evening-Up Litters until Weaning. Lincoln, NE, USA: University of Nebraska; 2006: 7-10
    Google Scholar
  • 30 Paß SC. Auswirkungen einer sehr frühen, automatisierten Saugferkelbeifütterung in einem Betrieb mit einer hohen Reproduktionsleistung der Sauen. Hannover: Diss Vet Med; 2017
    Google Scholar
  • 31 Hinnley B, Cvjetković V, Espigares D. et al. Cystoisospora suis Control in Europe Is Not Always Effective. Front Vet Sci 2020; 7: 113
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Christensen JBP, Henriksen SA. Shedding of oocysts in piglets experimentaly infected with Isospora suis. Acta Vet Scand 1994; 35: 165-172
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Kemper N. Update on postpartum dysgalactia syndrome in sows. J Anim Sci 2020; 98 (01) 117-125
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Schwennen C, Reckels B, Klingenberg M. et al. Influence of Feeding Compound Feed Rich in Fibre during Parturition and Lactation on Health and Performance of Sows. Animals: an open access journal from MDPI 2022; 12 (04) DOI: 10.3390/ani12040497.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Betancur C, Martínez Y, Tellez-Isaias G. et al. Effect of Oral Administration with Lactobacillus plantarum CAM6 Strain on Sows during Gestation-Lactation and the Derived Impact on Their Progeny Performance. Mediators Inflamm 2021; 6615960
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Klein C. SNP-Screening in Kandidatengenen auf Chromosom 2 und 12 für die Resistenz gegen Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae. Gießen: Diss Vet Med; 2014
    Google Scholar
  • 37 Jorgensen CB, Cirera S, Anderson S. et al. Linkage and comparative mapping of the locus controlling susceptibility towards E. COLI F4ab/ac diarrhoeain pigs. Cytogenet Genome Res 2001; 102 (1 – 4): 157-162
    Google Scholar
  • 38 Kreuzer S, Reissmann M, Brockmann GA. New fast and cost-effective gene test to get the ETEC F18 receptorstatus in pigs. Vet Microbiol 2013; 163 (3 – 4): 392-394
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Uzal FA, Songer JG. Clostridial Diseases. In: Zimmerman JJ, Karriker LA, Ramirez A. et al., Hrsg. Diseases of swine. 11. Aufl.. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell; 2019: 792-806
    Google Scholar
  • 40 Lindsay DS, Dubey JP, Santin-Durán M. Coccidia and Other Protoza. In: Zimmerman JJ, Karriker LA, Ramirez A. et al., Hrsg. Diseases of swine. 11. Aufl.. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell; 2019: 1015-1027
    Google Scholar
  • 41 Quesnel H, Farmer C, Devillers N. Colostrum intake: Influence on piglet performance and factors of variation. Livestock Science 2012; 146: 105-114
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Robert S, Martineau GP. Effects of repeated cross-fosterings on preweaning behavior and growth performance of piglets and on maternal behavior of sows. J Anim Sci 2001.
    Google Scholar
  • 43 Farmer C, Maes D, Peltoniemi O. Mammary System. In: Zimmerman JJ, Karriker LA, Ramirez A. et al., Hrsg. Diseases of swine. 11. Aufl.. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell; 2019: 313-338
    Google Scholar
  • 44 Thomson JR, Friendship RM. Digestive System. In: Zimmerman JJ, Karriker LA, Ramirez A. et al., Hrsg. Diseases of swine. 11. Aufl.. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell Blackwell Publishing; 2019: 234-263
    Google Scholar
  • 45 Ward SA, Kirkwood RN, Plush KJ. Are Larger Litters a Concern for Piglet Survival or An Effectively Manageable Trait?. Animals (Basel) 2020; 10 (02) 309
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Reiner G. Physiologie und Pathologie der Fortpflanzung. In: Reiner G. Hrsg. Krankes Schwein – kranker Bestand. 1. Aufl.. Stuttgart: Ulmer; 2015: 190-217
    Google Scholar