Download PDF
J Knee Surg 2023; 36(14): 1438-1446
DOI: 10.1055/a-1946-6143
Original Article

Three-Dimensional Orientation of the Native Anterior Cruciate Ligament in Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Jorge Rolando Ortiz Morales 
2   Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá D.C., Colombia
,
Laura López 
2   Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá D.C., Colombia
,
Juan Sebastián Herrera 
2   Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá D.C., Colombia
,
José Tomás Martínez 
2   Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá D.C., Colombia
,
Giancarlo Buitrago 
3   Institute of Clinical Research, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá D.C, Colombia
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

The aim of this study was to describe the three-dimensional orientation of the native anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) by calculating the angles of inclination in relation to the axial plane which is given for the knee joint line in a group of healthy individuals. These could help to establish guidelines that may be used for the surgical positioning of bone tunnels during ACL reconstruction. A total of 290 MRI scans of patients with integrity of the ACL were evaluated; three observers identified the coordinates of the femoral and tibial insertion sites, then it is defined the vector and evaluated its angles with respect to axial axis and calculated the angles with trigonometric equations. The data were analyzed according to the age, sex, side, BMI, and height of the patients, and the interobserver reliability was calculated. The patient demographics were as follows: age average: 45 years old, BMI average: 27.1, 54% right knees, and 60% female. The average angle for all the measurements was 76.95 degrees (SD ± 6.8 degrees) in the sagittal plane, 81.65 degrees (SD ± 7.79 degrees) in the coronal plane and 33.17 degrees (SD ± 4.98 degrees) in the axial plane. No statistically significant differences were found between the categorical variables mentioned; moderate to substantial interobserver reliability strength was found with an average kappa of 0.791 for all measurements. The three-dimensional orientation of the native ACL in a group of healthy individuals was established. The findings can be helpful for performing anatomical reconstructions of the ACL in injured patients using as reference the average calculated angles, or measure of the contralateral non-injured knee for surgical planning; these results serve as a basis for the design of a technique that optimizes the three-dimensional position of the ACL when it undergoes reconstruction in the trend toward greater precision for better functional results. Biomechanical and clinical-surgical studies are required to further evaluate our results.

Keywords

anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction - magnetic resonance imaging - knee - imaging - three-dimensional


Publication History

Received: 21 July 2020

Accepted: 15 September 2022

Accepted Manuscript online:
18 September 2022

Article published online:
24 January 2023

© 2023. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Beynnon BD, Johnson RJ, Abate JA, Fleming BC, Nichols CE. Treatment of anterior cruciate ligament injuries, part I. Am J Sports Med 2005; 33 (10) 1579-1602
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Kaeding CC, Léger-St-Jean B, Magnussen RA. Epidemiology and diagnosis of anterior cruciate ligament injuries. Clin Sports Med 2017; 36 (01) 1-8
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Mall NA, Chalmers PN, Moric M. et al. Incidence and trends of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the United States. Am J Sports Med 2014; 42 (10) 2363-2370
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Singh N. International epidemiology of anterior cruciate ligament injuries. Ortho Res Online J 2018; 5 (01) 94-96
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Yasuda K, van Eck CF, Hoshino Y, Fu FH, Tashman S. Anatomic single- and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, part 1: basic science. Am J Sports Med 2011; 39 (08) 1789-1799
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Bining J, Andrews G, Forster BB. The ABCs of the anterior cruciate ligament: a primer for magnetic resonance imaging assessment of the normal, injured and surgically repaired anterior cruciate ligament. Br J Sports Med 2009; 43 (11) 856-862
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Gelber PE, Erquicia J, Abat F. et al. Effectiveness of a footprint guide to establish an anatomic femoral tunnel in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: computed tomography evaluation in a cadaveric model. Arthroscopy 2011; 27 (06) 817-824
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Irarrázaval S, Albers M, Chao T, Freddie H. Gross, arthroscopic, and radiographic anatomies of the anterior cruciate ligament foundations for anterior cruciate ligament surgery anterior cruciate ligament anatomy double bundle arthroscopy embryology. Clin Sports Med 2017; 36 (01) 9-23
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Dai X, Cai Y. Measurement of anterior cruciate ligament angles in single-bundle reconstruction using the anteromedial portal. Am J Orthop 2012; 41 (06) 268-272
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Reid JC, Yonke B, Tompkins M. The angle of inclination of the native ACL in the coronal and sagittal planes. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2017; 25 (04) 1101-1105
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Stanford FC, Kendoff D, Warren RF, Pearle AD. Native anterior cruciate ligament obliquity versus anterior cruciate ligament graft obliquity: an observational study using navigated measurements. Am J Sports Med 2009; 37 (01) 114-119
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Tsai KJ, Chiang H, Jiang CC. Magnetic resonance imaging of anterior cruciate ligament rupture. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2004; 5: 21
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Adams D, Logerstedt DS, Hunter-Giordano A, Axe MJ, Snyder-Mackler L. Current concepts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a criterion-based rehabilitation progression. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2012; 42 (07) 601-614
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Howell SM. Principles for placing the tibial tunnel and avoiding roof impingement during reconstruction of a torn anterior cruciate ligament. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 1998; 6 (Suppl. 01) S49-S55
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Parkinson B, Robb C, Thomas M, Thompson P, Spalding T. Factors that predict failure in anatomic single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 2017; 45 (07) 1529-1536
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Yoo JD, Papannagari R, Park SE, DeFrate LE, Gill TJ, Li G. The effect of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction on knee joint kinematics under simulated muscle loads. Am J Sports Med 2005; 33 (02) 240-246
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Guenoun D, Vaccaro J, Le Corroller T. et al. A dynamic study of the anterior cruciate ligament of the knee using an open MRI. Surg Radiol Anat 2017; 39 (03) 307-314
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Markatos K, Kaseta MK, Lallos SN, Korres DS, Efstathopoulos N. The anatomy of the ACL and its importance in ACL reconstruction. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 2013; 23 (07) 747-752
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Ahn JH, Lee SH, Yoo JC, Ha HC. Measurement of the graft angles for the anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with transtibial technique using postoperative magnetic resonance imaging in comparative study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2007; 15 (11) 1293-1300
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Nacey NC, Geeslin MG, Miller GW, Pierce JL. Magnetic resonance imaging of the knee: an overview and update of conventional and state of the art imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2017; 45 (05) 1257-1275
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Araki D, Thorhauer E, Tashman S. Three-dimensional isotropic magnetic resonance imaging can provide a reliable estimate of the native anterior cruciate ligament insertion site anatomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2018; 26 (05) 1311-1318
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Scheffler SU, Maschewski K, Becker R, Asbach P. In-vivo three-dimensional MR imaging of the intact anterior cruciate ligament shows a variable insertion pattern of the femoral and tibial footprints. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2018; 26 (12) 3667-3672
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977; 33 (01) 159-174
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Illingworth KD, Hensler D, Working ZM, Macalena JA, Tashman S, Fu FH. A simple evaluation of anterior cruciate ligament femoral tunnel position: the inclination angle and femoral tunnel angle. Am J Sports Med 2011; 39 (12) 2611-2618
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar