Download PDF
Am J Perinatol 2024; 41(S 01): e174-e179
DOI: 10.1055/a-1862-0078
Original Article

Comparison of Assist/Control Ventilation with and without Volume Guarantee in Term or Near-Term Infants

Handan Bezirganoglu 
1   Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Health Sciences, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Türkiye
2   Division of Neonatology, Trabzon Kanuni Training and Research Hospital, Trabzon, Türkiye
,
Nilufer Okur
1   Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Health Sciences, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Türkiye
3   Division of Neonatology, Diyarbakir Gazi Yasargil Training and Research Hospital, Diyarbakir, Türkiye
,
Mehmet Buyuktiryaki 
1   Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Health Sciences, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Türkiye
4   Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, İstanbul Medipol University Medical School, İstanbul, Türkiye
,
Serife S. Oguz
1   Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Health Sciences, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Türkiye
,
Evrim A. Dizdar
1   Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Health Sciences, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Türkiye
,
Fatma N. Sari
1   Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Health Sciences, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Türkiye
› Author Affiliations Funding None.
› Further Information
Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Objectives This study aimed to compare the effects of volume guarantee (VG) combined with assist/control (AC) ventilation to AC alone on hypocarbia episodes and extubation success in infants born at or near term.

Methods In this prospective cohort study, infants >34 weeks of gestation at birth, who were born in our hospital supported by synchronized, time-cycled, pressure limited, assist/control ventilation (AC) or assist-controlled VG mechanical ventilation (AC + VG) were included. After admission, infants received either AC or VG + AC using by Leoni Plus ventilator. The ventilation mode was left to the clinician. In the AC group, peak airway pressure was set clinically. In the VG + AC group, desired tidal volume was set at 5 mL/kg, with the ventilator adjusting peak inspiratory pressure to deliver this volume. The study was completed once the patient extubated.

Results There were 35 patients in each group. Incidence of hypocarbia was lower in the VG + AC compared with AC (%17.1 and 22.8%, respectively) but statistically not significant. Out-of-range partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PCO2) levels were lower in the VG + AC group and it reached borderline statistical significance (p = 0.06). The median extubation time was 70 (42–110) hours in the VG + AC group, 89.5 (48.5–115.5) hours in the AC group, and it did not differ between groups (p = 0.47).

Conclusion We found combining AC and VG ventilation compared with AC ventilation alone yielded similar hypocarbia episodes and extubation time for infants of >34 gestational weeks with borderline significance lower out-of-range PCO2 incidence.

Key Points

  • Underlying lung pathology requiring mechanical ventilation support in term infant is heterogeneous.

  • VG ventilation compared with conventional modes yielded similar hypocarbia episodes in term infants.

  • Combining VG ventilation lead to borderline significance lower out-of-range PCO2 incidence.

Keywords

assist controlled ventilation - extubation success - hypocarbia - term infant - volume guarantee

Authors' Contributions

N.O. had primary responsibility for protocol development and analytic framework of the study, outcome assessment, and manuscript preparation. H.B. and F.N.S. participated in the development of the protocol and analytic framework of the study, had primary responsibility for review of the files, patient screening, enrollment, and data entry, and prepared the manuscript with N.O. M.B., E.A.D., and S.S.O. contributed to preparation and revision of the manuscript.




Publication History

Received: 31 January 2022

Accepted: 11 May 2022

Accepted Manuscript online:
25 May 2022

Article published online:
05 July 2022

© 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Sutton L. Population-based data on full-term neonates with severe morbidity. Semin Neonatol 1997; 2 (03) 189-193
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Gouyon JB, Ribakovsky C, Ferdynus C, Quantin C, Sagot P, Gouyon B. Burgundy Perinatal Network. Severe respiratory disorders in term neonates. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2008; 22 (01) 22-30
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Keszler M. Volume-targeted ventilation. Early Hum Dev 2006; 82 (12) 811-818
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Klingenberg C, Wheeler KI, McCallion N, Morley CJ, Davis PG. Volume-targeted versus pressure-limited ventilation in neonates. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017; 10: CD003666
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Peng W, Zhu H, Shi H, Liu E. Volume-targeted ventilation is more suitable than pressure-limited ventilation for preterm infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2014; 99 (02) F158-F165
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Cheema IU, Sinha AK, Kempley ST, Ahluwalia JS. Impact of volume guarantee ventilation on arterial carbon dioxide tension in newborn infants: a randomised controlled trial. Early Hum Dev 2007; 83 (03) 183-189
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Chowdhury O, Rafferty GF, Lee S, Hannam S, Milner AD, Greenough A. Volume-targeted ventilation in infants born at or near term. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2012; 97 (04) F264-F266
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Bhat P, Chowdhury O, Shetty S. et al. Volume-targeted versus pressure-limited ventilation in infants born at or near term. Eur J Pediatr 2016; 175 (01) 89-95
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Solberg MT, Solevåg AL, Clarke S. Optimal conventional mechanical ventilation in full-term newborns: a systematic review. Adv Neonatal Care 2018; 18 (06) 451-461
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Chowdhury O, Greenough A. Neonatal ventilatory techniques - which are best for infants born at term?. Arch Med Sci 2011; 7 (03) 381-387
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Wang C, Guo L, Chi C. et al. Mechanical ventilation modes for respiratory distress syndrome in infants: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Crit Care 2015; 19 (01) 108
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Wheeler K, Klingenberg C, McCallion N, Morley CJ, Davis PG. Volume-targeted versus pressure-limited ventilation in the neonate. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010; (11) CD003666
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Clark RH. The epidemiology of respiratory failure in neonates born at an estimated gestational age of 34 weeks or more. J Perinatol 2005; 25 (04) 251-257
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Ramadan G, Paul N, Morton M, Peacock JL, Greenough A. Outcome of ventilated infants born at term without major congenital abnormalities. Eur J Pediatr 2012; 171 (02) 331-336
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Ambalavanan N, Carlo WA. Hypocapnia and hypercapnia in respiratory management of newborn infants. Clin Perinatol 2001; 28 (03) 517-531
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Lingappan K, Kaiser JR, Srinivasan C, Gunn AJ. Relationship between PCO2 and unfavorable outcome in infants with moderate-to-severe hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy. Pediatr Res 2016; 80 (02) 204-208
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Nadeem M, Murray D, Boylan G, Dempsey EM, Ryan CA. Blood carbon dioxide levels and adverse outcome in neonatal hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy. Am J Perinatol 2010; 27 (05) 361-365
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Hendricks-Muñoz KD, Walton JP. Hearing loss in infants with persistent fetal circulation. Pediatrics 1988; 81 (05) 650-656
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Doerr CH, Gajic O, Berrios JC. et al. Hypercapnic acidosis impairs plasma membrane wound resealing in ventilator-injured lungs. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2005; 171 (12) 1371-1377
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Abubakar K, Keszler M. Effect of volume guarantee combined with assist/control vs synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation. J Perinatol 2005; 25 (10) 638-642
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Lantos L, Berenyi A, Morley C, Somogyvari Z, Belteki G. Volume guarantee ventilation in neonates treated with hypothermia for hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy during interhospital transport. J Perinatol 2021; 41 (03) 528-534
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Cheema IU, Ahluwalia JS. Feasibility of tidal volume-guided ventilation in newborn infants: a randomized, crossover trial using the volume guarantee modality. Pediatrics 2001; 107 (06) 1323-1328
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Baumer JH. International randomised controlled trial of patient triggered ventilation in neonatal respiratory distress syndrome. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2000; 82 (01) F5-F10
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar