Synlett 2022; 33(03): 259-263
DOI: 10.1055/a-1675-1043
letter

Triphenylphosphine/1,2-Diiodoethane-Promoted Formylation of Indoles with N,N-Dimethylformamide

Yu-Rong Zhu
a   College of Chemistry and Materials Science, Shanghai Normal University, 100 Guilin Road, Shanghai, 200234, P. R. of China
b   Key Laboratory of Organofluorine Chemistry, Shanghai Institute of Organic Chemistry, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), 345 Lingling Road, Shanghai, 200032, P. R. of China
,
Jin-Hong Lin
b   Key Laboratory of Organofluorine Chemistry, Shanghai Institute of Organic Chemistry, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), 345 Lingling Road, Shanghai, 200032, P. R. of China
c   Department of Chemistry, Innovative Drug Research Center, Shanghai University, Shanghai, 200444, P. R. of China
,
Ji-Chang Xiao
a   College of Chemistry and Materials Science, Shanghai Normal University, 100 Guilin Road, Shanghai, 200234, P. R. of China
b   Key Laboratory of Organofluorine Chemistry, Shanghai Institute of Organic Chemistry, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), 345 Lingling Road, Shanghai, 200032, P. R. of China
› Author Affiliations
We thank the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21971252, 21991122) , Science and Technology Department of Gansu Province (19ZD2GC001), and the Key Research Program of Frontier Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences (QYZDJSSWSLH049) for financial support.


Abstract

Despite intensive studies on the synthesis of 3-formylindoles, it is still highly desirable to develop efficient methods for the formylation of indoles, due to the shortcomings of the reported methods, such as inconvenient operations and/or harsh reaction conditions. Here, we describe a Ph3P/ICH2CH2I-promoted formylation of indoles with DMF under mild conditions. A Vilsmeier-type intermediate is readily formed from DMF promoted by the Ph3P/ICH2CH2I system. A one-step formylation process can be applied to various electron-rich indoles, but a hydrolysis needs to be carried out as a second step in the case of electron-deficient indoles. Convenient operations make this protocol attractive.

Supporting Information



Publication History

Received: 09 September 2021

Accepted after revision: 20 October 2021

Accepted Manuscript online:
20 October 2021

Article published online:
10 November 2021

© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 
  • References and Notes

    • 1a Vilsmeier A, Haack A. Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges. 1927; 60: 119
    • 1b Meth-Cohn O, Stanforth SP. In Comprehensive Organic Synthesis, Vol. 2, Chap. 3.6. Trost BM, Fleming I. Pergamon; Oxford: 1991: 777
  • 2 Wynberg H. Chem. Rev. 1960; 60: 169
  • 3 Lindoy LF, Meehan GV, Svenstrup N. Synthesis 1998; 1029
  • 4 Rieche A, Gross H, Höft E. Chem. Ber. 1960; 93: 88
  • 5 Thanikachalam PV, Maurya RK, Garg V, Monga V. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2019; 180: 562
    • 6a Wu W, Su W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011; 133: 11924
    • 6b Chen J, Liu B, Liu D, Liu S, Cheng J. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2012; 354: 2438
    • 6c Li L.-T, Huang J, Li H.-Y, Wen L.-J, Wang P, Wang B. Chem. Commun. 2012; 48: 5187
    • 6d Li L.-T, Li H.-Y, Xing L.-J, Wen L.-J, Wang P, Wang B. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2012; 10: 9519
    • 6e Zhang L, Peng C, Zhao D, Wang Y, Fu H.-J, Shen Q, Li J.-X. Chem. Commun. 2012; 48: 5928
    • 6f Li X, Gu X, Li Y, Li P. ACS Catal. 2014; 4: 1897
    • 6g Zhang B, Liu B, Chen J, Wang J, Liu M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2014; 55: 5618
    • 6h Lu L, Xiong Q, Guo S, He T, Xu F, Gong J, Zhu Z, Cai H. Tetrahedron 2015; 71: 3637
    • 6i Zhang W, Tang J, Yu W, Huang Q, Fu Y, Kuang G, Pan C, Yu G. ACS Catal. 2018; 8: 8084
    • 6j Ling F, Cheng D, Liu T, Liu L, Li Y, Li J, Zhong W. Green Chem. 2021; 23: 4107
    • 6k Wang Q.-D, Zhou B, Yang J.-M, Fang D, Ren J, Zeng B.-B. Synlett 2017; 28: 2670
    • 6l Lin D.-Z, Huang J.-M. Org. Lett. 2019; 21: 5862
    • 6m Yang L, Liu Z, Li Y, Lei N, Shen Y, Zheng K. Org. Lett. 2019; 21: 7702
    • 6n Tongkhan S, Radchatawedchakoon W, Kruanetr S, Sakee U. Tetrahedron Lett. 2014; 55: 3909
    • 7a Fei H, Yu J, Jiang Y, Guo H, Cheng J. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2013; 11: 7092
    • 7b Betterley NM, Kerdphon S, Chaturonrutsamee S, Kongsriprapan S, Surawatanawong P, Soorukram D, Pohmakotr M, Andersson PG, Reutrakul V, Kuhakarn C. Asian J. Org. Chem. 2018; 7: 1642
    • 8a Chen J, Lin J.-H, Xiao J.-C. Org. Lett. 2018; 20: 3061
    • 8b Chen J, Lin J.-H, Xiao J.-C. Chem. Commun. 2018; 54: 7034
    • 8c Zhang W, Chen J, Lin J.-H, Xiao J.-C, Gu Y.-C. iScience 2018; 5: 110
    • 8d Zhang W, Gu Y.-C, Lin J.-H, Xiao J.-C. Org. Lett. 2020; 22: 6642
    • 10a Formylation of Electron-Rich Indoles; General Procedure A 25 mL tube was charged with Ph3P (0.75 mmol, 1.5 equiv), ICH2CH2I (0.75 mmol, 1.5 equiv), the appropriate indole 1 (0.5 mmol, 1 equiv), DMF (2 mL), and H2O (5 mL) under air, and the mixture was stirred at 80 °C for 2 h. The mixture was then cooled to rt and sat. aq brine was added. The crude organic product was extracted with CH2Cl2, and the combined organic phase was dried (Na2SO4), filtered, and concentrated under reduced pressure. The residue was purified by flash column chromatography (silica gel, pentane–EtOAc). Formylation of Electron-Deficient Indoles; General Procedure A 25 mL tube was charged with Ph3P (0.75 mmol, 1.5 equiv), ICH2CH2I (0.75 mmol, 1.5 equiv), the appropriate indole 1 (0.5 mmol, 1 equiv), DMAP (0.5 mmol, 1 equiv), and DMF (2 mL) under air, and the mixture was stirred at 80 °C for 2 h. H2O (5 mL) was added and the mixture was stirred at 80 °C for a further 2 h. Similar workup to the above gave the pure product. 5-Vinyl-1H-indole-3-carbaldehyde (4t) White solid; yield: 49.4 mg (58%); mp 164.9–166.7 °C. IR (neat): 3148, 1635, 1615, 1522, 1473, 1440, 1392, 1245, 1129, 911, 819, 790 cm–1. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d 6): δ = 12.18 (s, 1 H), 9.94 (s, 1 H), 8.28 (s, 1 H), 8.14 (s, 1 H), 7.52–7.41 (m, 2 H), 6.85 (dd, J = 17.5, 10.9 Hz, 1 H), 5.76 (d, J = 17.6 Hz, 1 H), 5.18 (d, J = 10.9 Hz, 1 H). 13C NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d 6): δ = 185.50 (s), 139.36 (s), 137.94 (s), 137.35 (s), 132.08 (s), 124.88 (s), 122.02 (s), 119.57 (s), 118.80 (s), 113.06 (s), 112.75 (s). HRMS (EI): m/z [M]+ calcd for C11H9NO: 171.0684; found: 171.0682.
    • 10b Myers AG, Hammond M, Wu Y, Xiang J.-N, Harrington PM, Kuo EY. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996; 118: 10006
    • 10c Dorta RL, Rodríguez MS, Salazar JA, Suárez E. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997; 38: 4675
    • 11a Myers AG, Hammond M, Wu Y, Xiang J.-N, Harrington PM, Kuo EY. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996; 118: 10006
    • 11b Dorta RL, Rodríguez MS, Salazar J, Suárez E. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997; 38: 4675