PDF herunterladen
ZWR - Das Deutsche Zahnärzteblatt 2021; 130(09): 395-403
DOI: 10.1055/a-1577-5596
Fortbildung

Keramikimplantate – materialspezifische und klinische Grundlagen

Stefan Röhling
1   Oralchirurgie T1, Gahlert & Röhling, München
,
Michael Gahlert
2   Oralchirurgie T1, Gahlert & Röhling, München
› Institutsangaben
› Weitere Informationen
Auch verfügbar auf
    Lizenzen und Reprints

Keramische Zahnimplantate aus Zirkonoxid haben sich in den letzten 2 Jahrzehnten auf dem Markt etabliert und sind für viele Anwender ein fester Bestandteil des klinischen Alltags geworden. Im folgenden Beitrag wird durch die Darstellung der wissenschaftlichen Grundlagen erörtert, ob auch heute noch Bedenken bei der klinischen Anwendung bestehen müssen und ob unbegründete Vorurteile aus der Vergangenheit noch immer relevant sind.

Publikationsverlauf

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
16. September 2021

© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Roehling S, Gahlert M. Keramische Zahnimplantate – wissenschaftliche Grundlagen und klinische Anwendung. Zahnmedizin up2date 2015; 5: 425-444
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 2 Roehling S, Woelfler H, Hicklin S. et al. A Retrospective Clinical Study with Regard to Survival and Success Rates of Zirconia Implants up to and after 7 Years of Loading. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2016; 18: 545-558
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 3 Gahlert M, Burtscher D, Pfundstein G. et al. Dental zirconia implants up to three years in function: a retrospective clinical study and evaluation of prosthetic restorations and failures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2013; 28: 896-904
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 4 Roehling S, Schlegel KA, Woelfler H. et al. Performance and outcome of zirconia dental implants in clinical studies: A meta-analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res 2018; 29 (Suppl. 16) 135-153
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 5 Morton D, Gallucci G, Lin WS. et al. Group 2 ITI Consensus Report: Prosthodontics and implant dentistry. Clin Oral Implants Res 2018; 29 (Suppl. 16) 215-223
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 6 Roehling S, Meng B, Cochran D. Sandblasted and acid etched implant surfaces with or without high surface free energy – experimental and clinical background. In: Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T, Jimbo R. Implant Surfaces and their Biological and Clinical Impact. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2015: 93-136
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 7 Röhling S, Gahlert M. Keramische Zahnimplantate – Wissenschaftliche Grundlagen und klinische Anwendung. Zahnmedizin up2date 2015; 9: 425-444
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 8 Christel P, Meunier A, Heller M. et al. Mechanical properties and short-term in-vivo evaluation of yttrium-oxide-partially-stabilized zirconia. J Biomed Mater Res 1989; 23: 45-61
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 9 Andreiotelli M, Kohal RJ. Fracture strength of zirconia implants after artificial aging. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2009; 11: 158-166
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 10 Sanon C, Chevalier J, Douillard T. et al. Low temperature degradation and reliability of one-piece ceramic oral implants with a porous surface. Dent Mater 2013; 29: 389-397
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 11 Chevalier J, Loh J, Gremillard L. et al. Low-temperature degradation in zirconia with a porous surface. Acta Biomater 2011; 7: 2986-2993
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 12 Monzavi M, Zhang F, Meille S. et al. Influence of artificial aging on mechanical properties of commercially and non-commercially available zirconia dental implants. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2020; 101: 103423
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 13 Roehling S, Schlegel KA, Woelfler H. et al. Zirconia compared to titanium dental implants in preclinical studies – A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res 2019; 30: 365-395
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 14 Bormann KH, Gellrich NC, Kniha H. et al. Biomechanical evaluation of a microstructured zirconia implant by a removal torque comparison with a standard Ti-SLA implant. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012; 23: 1210-1216
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 15 Gahlert M, Roehling S, Sprecher CM. et al. In vivo performance of zirconia and titanium implants: a histomorphometric study in mini pig maxillae. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012; 23: 281-286
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 16 Gahlert M, Roehling S, Wieland M. et al. Osseointegration of zirconia and titanium dental implants: a histological and histomorphometrical study in the maxilla of pigs. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009; 20: 1247-1253
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 17 Gahlert M, Rohling S, Wieland M. et al. A comparison study of the osseointegration of zirconia and titanium dental implants. A biomechanical evaluation in the maxilla of pigs. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2010; 12: 297-305
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 18 Janner SFM, Gahlert M, Bosshardt DD. et al. Bone response to functionally loaded, two-piece zirconia implants: A preclinical histometric study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2018; 29: 277-289
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 19 Roehling S, Cochran D. Soft Tissue Integration of Zirconia Implants. Forum Implantologicum 2018; 14: 30-37
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 20 Berglundh T, Lindhe J, Ericsson I. et al. The soft tissue barrier at implants and teeth. Clin Oral Implants Res 1991; 2: 81-90
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 21 Linares A, Grize L, Munoz F. et al. Histological assessment of hard and soft tissues surrounding a novel ceramic implant: a pilot study in the minipig. J Clin Periodontol 2016; 43: 538-546
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 22 Kniha K, Gahlert M, Hicklin S. et al. Evaluation of Hard and Soft Tissue Dimensions Around Zirconium Oxide Implant-Supported Crowns: A 1-Year Retrospective Study. J Periodontol 2016; 87: 511-518
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 23 Han HJ, Kim S, Han DH. Multifactorial evaluation of implant failure: a 19-year retrospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2014; 29: 303-310
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 24 Lang NP, Berglundh T. Working Group 4 of Seventh European Workshop on Periodontology. Periimplant diseases: where are we now?--Consensus of the Seventh European Workshop on Periodontology. J Clin Periodontol 2011; 38 (Suppl. 11) 178-181
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 25 Zitzmann NU, Berglundh T. Definition and prevalence of peri-implant diseases. J Clin Periodontol 2008; 35 (Suppl. 08) 286-291
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 26 Mombelli A, Lang NP. The diagnosis and treatment of peri-implantitis. Periodontology 2000 1998; 17: 63-76
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 27 Derks J, Tomasi C. Peri-implant health and disease. A systematic review of current epidemiology. J Clin Periodontol 2015; 42 (Suppl. 16) S158-S171
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 28 Mombelli A, Lang NP. Microbial aspects of implant dentistry. Periodontol 2000 1994; 4: 74-80
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 29 Roehling S, Astasov-Frauenhoffer M, Hauser-Gerspach I. et al. In Vitro Biofilm Formation on Titanium and Zirconia Implant Surfaces. J Periodontol 2017; 88: 298-307
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 30 Degidi M, Artese L, Scarano A. et al. Inflammatory infiltrate, microvessel density, nitric oxide synthase expression, vascular endothelial growth factor expression, and proliferative activity in peri-implant soft tissues around titanium and zirconium oxide healing caps. J Periodontol 2006; 77: 73-80
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 31 Roehling S, Gahlert M, Janner S. et al. Ligature-Induced Peri-implant Bone Loss Around Loaded Zirconia and Titanium Implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2019; 34: 357-365
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 32 Becker J, John G, Becker K. et al. Clinical performance of two-piece zirconia implants in the posterior mandible and maxilla: a prospective cohort study over 2 years. Clin Oral Implants Res 2017; 28: 29-35
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 33 Gahlert M, Kniha H, Weingart D. et al. A prospective clinical study to evaluate the performance of zirconium dioxide dental implants in single-tooth gaps. Clin Oral Implants Res 2016; 27: e176-e184
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 34 Grassi FR, Capogreco M, Consonni D. et al. Immediate occlusal loading of one-piece zirconia implants: five-year radiographic and clinical evaluation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2015; 30: 671-680
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 35 Bormann KH, Gellrich NC, Kniha H. et al. A prospective clinical study to evaluate the performance of zirconium dioxide dental implants in single-tooth edentulous area: 3-year follow-up. BMC Oral Health 2018; 18: 181
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 36 Balmer M, Spies BC, Kohal RJ. et al. Zirconia implants restored with single crowns or fixed dental prostheses: 5-year results of a prospective cohort investigation. Clin Oral Implants Res 2020; 31: 452-462
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 37 Koller M, Steyer E, Theisen K. et al. Two-piece zirconia versus titanium implants after 80 months: Clinical outcomes from a prospective randomized pilot trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 2020; 31: 388-396
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 38 Payer M, Heschl A, Koller M. et al. All-ceramic restoration of zirconia two-piece implants--a randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 2015; 26: 371-376
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 39 Röhling S, Gahlert M. Ein- und zweiteilige Keramikimplantate aus Zirkonoxid – die Behandlungsalternative zuTitan. Quintessenz 2017; 68: 1423-1428
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar