Download PDF
Int J Sports Med 2022; 43(02): 131-137
DOI: 10.1055/a-1502-6406
Training & Testing

Ankle Angle but Not Knee Angle Influences Force Fluctuations During Plantar Flexion

Georgios Trypidakis
1   Department of Physical Education and Sports Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
,
Ioannis G. Amiridis
2   Department of Physical Education and Sports Science, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Serres, Greece
,
Roger Enoka
3   Department of Integrative Physiology, University of Colorado at Boulder, Boulder, United States
,
Irini Tsatsaki
1   Department of Physical Education and Sports Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
,
Eleftherios Kellis
2   Department of Physical Education and Sports Science, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Serres, Greece
,
Francesco Negro
4   Clinical and Experimental Sciences, Universita degli Studi di Brescia, Brescia, Italy
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the influence of changes in ankle- and knee-joint angles on force steadiness and the discharge characteristics of motor units (MU) in soleus when the plantar flexors performed steady isometric contractions. Submaximal contractions (5, 10, 20, and 40% of maximum) were performed at two ankle angles (75° and 105°) and two knee angles (120° and 180°) by 14 young adults. The coefficient of variation of force decreased as the target force increased from 5 to 20% of maximal force, then remained unaltered at 40%. Independently of knee angle, the coefficient of variation for force at the ankle angle of 75° (long length) was always less (p<0.05) than that at 105° (shorter length). Mean discharge rate, discharge variability, and variability in neural activation of soleus motor units were less (p<0.05) at the 75° angle than at 105°. It was not possible to record MUs from medial gastrocnemius at the knee angle of 120° due to its minimal activation. The changes in knee-joint angle did not influence any of the outcome measures. The findings underscore the dominant role of the soleus muscle in the control of submaximal forces produced by the plantar flexor muscles.

Key words

steadiness - motor unit - muscular length - soleus - high-density EMG


Publication History

Received: 04 August 2020

Accepted: 27 April 2021

Article published online:
19 July 2021

© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • References

  • 1 Jones KE, Hamilton AFDC, Wolpert DM. Sources of signal-dependent noise during isometric force production. J Neurophysiol 2002; 88: 1533-1544
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Enoka RM, Farina D. Force steadiness: from motor units to voluntary actions. Physiology (Bethesda) 2021; 36: 114-130
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Negro F, Holobar A, Farina D. Fluctuations in isometric muscle force can be described by one linear projection of low-frequency components of motor unit discharge rates. J Physiol 2009; 587: 5925-5938
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Thompson CK, Negro F, Johnson MD. et al. Robust and accurate decoding of motoneuron behaviour and prediction of the resulting force output. J Physiol 2018; 596: 2643-2659
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Castronovo AM, Mrachacz-Kersting N, Stevenson AJT. et al. Decrease in force steadiness with aging is associated with increased power of the common but not independent input to motor neurons. J Neurophysiol 2018; 120: 1616-1624
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Dideriksen JL, Negro F, Enoka RM. et al. Motor unit recruitment strategies and muscle properties determine the influence of synaptic noise on force steadiness. J Neurophysiol 2012; 107: 3357-3369
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Watanabe K, Gazzoni M, Holobar A. et al. Motor unit firing pattern of vastus lateralis muscle in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients. Muscle Nerve 2013; 48: 806-813
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Kawakami Y, Ichinose Y, Fukunaga T. Architectural and functional features of human triceps surae muscles during contraction. J Appl Physiol (1985) 1998; 85: 398-404
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Hali K, Kirk EA, Rice CL. Effect of knee joint position on triceps surae motor unit recruitment and firing rates. Exp Brain Res 2019; 237: 2345-2352
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Hyngstrom AS, Johnson MD, Miller JF. et al. Intrinsic electrical properties of spinal motoneurons vary with joint angle. Nat Neurosci 2007; 10: 363-369
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Johnson MD, Thompson CK, Tysseling VM. et al. The potential for understanding the synaptic organization of human motor commands via the firing patterns of motoneurons. J Neurophysiol 2017; 118: 520-531
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Macefield VG, Knellwolf TP. Functional properties of human muscle spindles. J Neurophysiol 2018; 120: 452-467
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Sturnieks DL, Wright JR, Fitzpatrick RC. Detection of simultaneous movement at two human arm joints. J Physiol 2007; 585: 833-842
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Harriss DJ, Macsween A, Atkinson G. Ethical standards in sport and exercise science research: 2020 update. Int J Sports Med 2019; 40: 813-817
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Farina D, Merletti R, Nazzaro M. et al. Effect of joint angle on EMG variables in leg and thigh muscles. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag 2001; 20: 62-71
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Negro F, Muceli S, Castronovo AM. et al. Multi-channel intramuscular and surface EMG decomposition by convolutive blind source separation. J Neural Eng 2016; 13: 026027
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Martinez-Valdes E, Negro F, Laine CM. et al. Tracking motor units longitudinally across experimental sessions with high-density surface electromyography. J Physiol 2017; 595: 1479-1496
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Pereira HM, Schlinder-DeLap B, Keenan KG. et al. Oscillations in neural drive and age-related reductions in force steadiness with a cognitive challenge. J Appl Physiol (1985) 2019; 126: 1056-1065
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Laine CM, Martinez-Valdes E, Falla D. et al. Motor neuron pools of synergistic thigh muscles share most of their synaptic input. J Neurosci 2015; 35: 12207-12216
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Martinez-valdes E, Negro F, Farina D. et al. Divergent response of low- versus high-threshold motor units to experimental muscle pain. J Physiol 2020; 598: 2093-2108
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Boccia G, Martinez-valdes E, Negro F. et al. Motor unit discharge rate and the estimated synaptic input to the vasti muscles is higher in open compared to closed kinetic chain exercise. J Appl Physiol (1985) 2019; 127: 950-958
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Hassan A, Thompson CK, Negro F. et al. Impact of parameter selection on estimates of motoneuron excitability using paired motor unit analysis. J Neur Eng 2020; 17: 016063
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Pascoe MA, Holmes MR, Enoka RM. Discharge characteristics of biceps brachii motor units at recruitment when older adults sustained an isometric contraction. J Neurophysiol 2011; 105: 571-581
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Cresswell AG, Löscher WN, Thorstensson A. Influence of gastrocnemius muscle length on triceps surae torque development and electromyographic activity in man. Exp Brain Res 1995; 105: 283-290
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Avancini C, De Oliveira LF, Menegaldo LL. et al. Variations in the spatial distribution of the amplitude of surface electromyograms are unlikely explained by changes in the length of medial gastrocnemius fibres with knee joint angle. PLoS One 2015; 10: e0126888
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Carpentier A, Duchateau J, Hainaut K. Velocity-dependent muscle strategy during plantarflexion in humans. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 1996; 6: 225-233
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Herzog W. Muscle properties and coordination during voluntary movement. J Sports Sci 2000; 18: 141-152
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Kennedy PM, Cresswell AG. The effect of muscle length on motor-unit recruitment during isometric plantar flexion in humans. Exp Brain Res 2001; 136: 58-64
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Miaki H, Someya F, Tachino K. A comparison of electrical activity in the triceps surae at maximum isometric contraction with the knee and ankle at various angles. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 1999; 80: 185-191
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Gandevia SC, Mckenzie DK. Activation of human muscles at short muscle lengths during maximal static efforts. J Physiol 1988; 407: 599-613
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Shinohara M, Yoshitake Y, Kouzaki M. et al. The medial gastrocnemius muscle attenuates force fluctuations during plantar flexion. Exp Brain Res 2006; 169: 15-23
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Farina D, Negro F, Muceli S. et al. Principles of motor unit physiology evolve with advances in technology. Physiology (Bethesda) 2016; 31: 83-94
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar