PDF herunterladen
Dtsch Med Wochenschr 2021; 146(16): 1035-1040
DOI: 10.1055/a-1241-6706
Dossier

Nichtinvasive kardiale Bildgebung in der Diagnostik der KHK

Non-invasive cardiac imaging in the work-up of coronary artery disease
Mohamed Marwan
› Weitere Informationen
Auch verfügbar auf
    Lizenzen und Reprints

Der angemessene Einsatz verschiedener Bildgebungsmodalitäten und deren adäquate Durchführung sowie die professionelle Befundung sind für eine qualitativ hochwertige medizinische Versorgung von KHK-Patienten entscheidend. Die Anzahl der wissenschaftlichen Erkenntnisse bzgl. der klinischen Relevanz verschiedener bildgebender Verfahren bei der Abklärung unterschiedlichen Krankheitskonstellationen wächst und wird in diesem Beitrag diskutiert.

Abstract

Cardiovascular imaging has experienced and is still experiencing tremendous advancements as far as hardware as well as software technology is concerned. In every day clinical routine, crucial decisions are daily being taken based on imaging findings. These decisions include changes to treatment strategies, performing further testing, recommending or adhering to preventive measures, and ultimately affect patient outcomes. Appropriate use of different imaging modalities which includes choosing the right modality, adequate performance of the imaging test as well as professional reporting is crucial for providing high quality medical care. Furthermore, a growing body of scientific evidence is currently available that show the clinical relevance of different imaging methods in the clarification of different disease constellations. This article describes various imaging modalities that are used in the work-up of CAD in everyday cardiac routine.

Schlüsselwörter

koronare Herzerkrankung - KHK - Diagnostik - CT - MRT - Echo

Key words

coronary artery disease - CAD - diagnosis - CT - MRI - echo


Publikationsverlauf

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
20. August 2021

© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Smiseth OA, Torp H, Opdahl A. et al. Myocardial strain imaging: how useful is it in clinical decision making?. Eur Heart J 2016; 37 (15) 1196-1207
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Biering-Sørensen T, Hoffmann S, Mogelvang R. et al. Myocardial strain analysis by 2-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography improves diagnostics of coronary artery stenosis in stable angina pectoris. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2014; 7 (01) 58-65
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Sicari R, Cortigiani L. The clinical use of stress echocardiography in ischemic heart disease. Cardiovasc Ultrasound 2017; 15 (01) 7
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Kolentinis M, Le M, Nagel E. et al. Contemporary Cardiac MRI in Chronic Coronary Artery Disease. Eur Cardiol 2020; 15: e50
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Nagel E, Greenwood JP, McCann GP. et al. Magnetic Resonance Perfusion or Fractional Flow Reserve in Coronary Disease. N Engl J Med 2019; 380 (25) 2418-2428
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Berman DS, Hachamovitch R, Shaw LJ. et al. Roles of nuclear cardiology, cardiac computed tomography, and cardiac magnetic resonance: Noninvasive risk stratification and a conceptual framework for the selection of noninvasive imaging tests in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. J Nucl Med 2006; 47 (07) 1107-1118
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Neumann FJ, Sousa-Uva M, Ahlsson A. et al. 2018 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur Heart J 2019; 40 (02) 87-165
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Kostkiewicz M. New techniques in diagnostic imaging--PET-CT for the imaging of cardiovascular disease. Przegl Lek 2012; 69 (02) 80-81
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Mc Ardle BA, Dowsley TF, deKemp RA. et al. Does rubidium-82 PET have superior accuracy to SPECT perfusion imaging for the diagnosis of obstructive coronary disease?: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012; 60 (18) 1828-1837
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Knuuti J, Wijns W, Saraste A. et al. 2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J 2020; 41 (03) 407-477
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Menke J, Kowalski J. Diagnostic accuracy and utility of coronary CT angiography with consideration of unevaluable results: A systematic review and multivariate Bayesian random-effects meta-analysis with intention to diagnose. Eur Radiol 2016; 26 (02) 451-458
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Douglas PS, Hoffmann U, Patel MR. et al. Outcomes of anatomical versus functional testing for coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 2015; 372 (14) 1291-1300
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Newby DE, Adamson PD. SCOT-HEART Investigators. et al. Coronary CT Angiography and 5-Year Risk of Myocardial Infarction. N Engl J Med 2018; 379 (10) 924-933
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Williams MC, Kwiecinski J, Doris M. et al. Low-Attenuation Noncalcified Plaque on Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography Predicts Myocardial Infarction: Results From the Multicenter SCOT-HEART Trial (Scottish Computed Tomography of the HEART). Circulation 2020; 141 (18) 1452-1462
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Marwan M. Computational fluid dynamics: can computed tomography imaging compete with cath-lab physiology?. Cardiovasc Res 2019; 115 (04) e41-e43
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Cook CM, Petraco R, Shun-Shin MJ. et al. Diagnostic Accuracy of Computed Tomography-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve: A Systematic Review. JAMA Cardiol 2017; 2 (07) 803-810
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar