Download PDF
Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes 2020; 128(03): 164-169
DOI: 10.1055/a-0603-3539
Article
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Assessment of the Dynamic Insulin Secretion and Sensitivity Test (DISST) Pre and Post Gastric bypass Surgery

John Wilson
1   Department of Medicine, University of Otago Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand
,
Paul Docherty
2   Centre for Bioengineering, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand
,
Richard Stubbs
3   P3 Research Limited, Wellington, New Zealand
,
J Geoffrey Chase
2   Centre for Bioengineering, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand
,
Jeremy Krebs
1   Department of Medicine, University of Otago Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand
› Author Affiliations Funding JW received salary funding from a New Zealand Diabetes Foundation Fellowship. Grant in aid from Wellington Medical Research Foundation for funding of Glucose analyser and sample analysis.
Further Information

Publication History

received 22 November 2017
revised 25 March 2018

accepted 09 April 2018

Publication Date:
11 June 2018 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Objective To compare the dynamic insulin secretion and sensitivity test (DISST) with the euglycaemic clamp in individuals undergoing open Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) surgery prior-to and one month after surgery.

Methods Insulin sensitivity in individuals with obesity undergoing RYGB was studied with DISST and a euglycaemic hyperinsulinaemic clamp.

Results Eleven participants, including nine females, mean(SD) age 51.2 (12.1) yrs, with a preoperative BMI of 48.7(9.5)kg/m2 were studied. Weight reduced from a mean (SD) of 133.8 (29.8) kg to 123.8 (28.9) kg post-surgery (p<0.001). The mean (SD) insulin sensitivity index (ISI-DISST) was 3.07×10−4 (2.18) L.pmol−1.min−1 preoperatively and 2.36 ×10−4 (0.78)L.pmol−1.min−1 postoperatively (p=0.37). The mean(SD) clamp ISI was 2.14 ×10−2 (1.80) mg.L.kg−1.min−1.pmol−1 and 2.00×10−2.(0.76) mg.L.kg−1.min−1.pmol−1 postoperatively (p=0.86). Correlation between ISI-DISST and ISI-Clamp preoperatively was r=0.81(95%CI 0.37-0.95) and post-operatively r=0.47(95%CI 0-0.88). Bland-Altman analysis demonstrates systematic bias between the two tests, where DISST underestimated insulin sensitivity compared with the clamp by 0.96×10-2.mg.L.kg−1.min−1.pmol−1 (95%CI -2.24 to 0.32).

Conclusions There was a strong correlation between DISST and the clamp preoperatively and DISST can be used to estimate insulin sensitivity in individuals with morbid obesity. After RYGB surgery, DISST had a weaker correlation with the clamp suggesting the fundamental physiological determinants of insulin sensitivity being measured by each method change in different ways with changes in glucose homeostasis following RYGB surgery.

Key words

dynamic insulin secretion and sensitivity test - Roux-en-Y gastric bypass - obesity - weight loss - Type 2 Diabetes
 

  • References

  • 1 Kahn SE, Hull RL, Utzschneider KM. Mechanisms linking obesity to insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes. Nature 2006; 444: 840-846
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Kahn BB, Flier JS. Obesity and insulin resistance. The Journal of Clinical Investigation 2000; 106: 473-481
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 De Fronzo RA, Tobin J, Andres R. Glucose clamp technique: A method for quantifying insulin secretion and resistance. Am J Physiol 1979; 237: E214-E223
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Bergman RN, Ider YZ, Bowden CR. et al. Quantitative estimation of insulin sensitivity. Am J Physiol 1979; 236: E667-E677
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Ferrannini E, Mari A. How to measure insulin sensitivity. Journal of Hypertension 1998; 16: 895-906
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Prigeon RL, Roder ME, Porte J. et al. The effect of insulin dose on the measurement of insulin sensitivity by the minimal model technique. Evidence for saturable insulin transport in humans. J Clin Invest 1996; 97: 501-507
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Otten J, Ahren B, Olsson T. Surrogate measures of insulin sensitivity vs the hyperinsulinaemic-euglycaemic clamp: a meta-analysis. Diabetologia 2014; 57: 1781-1788
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Lotz TF, Chase JG, McAuley KA. et al. Transient and steady-state euglycemic clamp validation of a model for glycemic control and insulin sensitivity testing. Diabetes Technol Ther 2006; 8: 338-346
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 McAuley KA, Berkeley JE, Docherty PD. et al. The Dynamic insulin sensitivity and secretion test-a novel measure of insulin sensitivity. Metabolism 2011; 60: 1748-1756
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Foo J, Krebs J, Hayes MT. et al. Studies in insulin resistance following very low calorie diet and/or gastric bypass surgery. Obesity Surgery 2011; 21: 1914-1920
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Martinussen C, Bojsen-Møller KN, Dirksen C. et al. Immediate enhancement of first-phase insulin secretion and unchanged glucose effectiveness in patients with type 2 diabetes after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. American Journal of Physiology - Endocrinology and Metabolism 2015; 308: E535-E544
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 White S, Brooks E, Jurikova L. et al. Long-term outcomes after gastric bypass. Obesity surgery 2005; 15: 155-163
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Dubois D, Dubois EF. A formula to estimate the approximate surface area if height and weight be known. Arch Intern Med. 1916; 17: 863-871
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Van Cauter E, Mestrez F, Sturis J. et al. Estimation of insulin secretion rates from C-peptide levels: Comparison of individual kinetic parameters for C-peptide clearance. Diabetes 1992; 41: 368-377
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Bewick V, Cheek L, Ball J. Statistics review 7: Correlation and regression. Critical Care 2003; 7: 451-459
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Laferrere B. Effect of gastric bypass surgery on the incretins. Diabetes & metabolism 2009; 35: 513-517
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Hann CE, Chase JG, Lin J. et al. Integral-based parameter identification for long-term dynamic verification of a glucose–insulin system model. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. 2005; 77: 259-270
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Lotz TF, Chase JG, McAuley KA. et al. Monte Carlo analysis of a new model-based method for insulin sensitivity testing. Computer methods and programs in Biomedicine 2008; 89: 215-225
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Matthews DR, Hosker JP, Rudenski AS. et al. Homeostasis model assessment: Insulin resistance and beta-cell function from fasting glucose and insulin concentrations in man. Diabetologia 1985; 28: 412-419
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Wickremesekera KS, Miller G, DeSilva Naotunne T. et al. Changes in Insulin Resistance following Gastric Bypass Surgery. Obes Surg 2005; 15: 474-481
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Faria G, Preto J, da Costa EL. et al. Acute improvement in insulin resistance after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: Is 3 days enough to correct insulin metabolism?. Obesity Surgery 2013; 23: 103-110
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar