Download PDF
Sportverletz Sportschaden 2018; 32(04): 251-259
DOI: 10.1055/a-0598-7655
Originalarbeit
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Diagnosis of A3 Pulley Injuries Using Ultrasound

Diagnose einer A3-Ringbandruptur mittels Ultraschall
Isabelle Schöffl
1   Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Klinikum Bamberg, Bamberg, Germany
2   Institute of Anatomy, University Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
,
Johannes Deeg
2   Institute of Anatomy, University Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
3   Department of Radiology, University Innsbruck, Österreich
,
Christoph Lutter
4   Department of Radiology, University Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
,
Thomas Bayer
4   Department of Radiology, University Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
,
Volker Schöffl
5   Department of Sportsmedicine, Department of Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, Klinikum Bamberg, Bamberg, Germany
6   Department of Trauma Surgery, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, FRG
7   Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, USA
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
11 December 2018 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Rationale and Objectives Pulley ruptures are the most common injuries in sport climbing. Ruptures of the A2 and A4 pulleys have been studied extensively, and ultrasound has proven to be a highly sensitive and specific tool for their diagnosis. However, the correct diagnosis of A3 pulley ruptures continues to be a challenge. Therefore, we investigated a novel approach to this pathology.

Material and Methods Eighteen fingers from nine different human cadavers were examined using high-resolution, dynamic ultrasound before and after being subjected to different combinations of singular and multiple iatrogenic pulley ruptures in a standardised fashion. Special attention was paid to the behaviour of the volar plate (VP) with respect to the proximal interphalangeal joint (PIP) and the flexor tendons before and after pulley rupture.

Results Injuries to the A2 and A4 pulleys were diagnosed via ultrasound with sensitivities of 90 % and 94 % and specificities of 100 % and 97 %, respectively. A direct visualisation of the A3 pulley was achieved in 61 % of the fingers. The VP became significantly thicker and shorter during finger flexion as well as after A3 pulley rupture. The distance between tendon and VP became significantly more pronounced after A3 pulley rupture. For distances greater than 0.9 mm between VP and tendon, a sensitivity of 76 % and a specificity of 94 % were achieved for determining A3 pulley ruptures.

Conclusion The distance measurement between VP and tendon was found to be a valid indirect method for the diagnosis of A3 pulley ruptures. This approach is the first ultrasound method for accurately diagnosing A3 pulley ruptures.

Zusammenfassung

Einleitung Ringbandverletzungen sind die häufigsten Verletzungen im Sportklettern. Verletzungen des A2- und des A4-Ringbandes wurden intensiv untersucht und der Ultraschall stellt das wesentliche diagnostische Mittel dar. Nachdem allerdings die Diagnose einer A3-Ringbandruptur diagnostisch noch erhebliche Schwierigkeiten bereitet untersuchten wir neue diagnostische Kriterien.

Material und Methoden 18 Finger von 9 verschiedenen humanen Kadverspendern wurden mittels dynamischem, hochauflösendem Ultraschall vor und nach standardisierten, iatrogen zugefügten verschiedenen Kombinationen an Ringbandrupturen untersucht. Hierbei wurde vor allem das Verhalten der palmaren Platte (VP) in Relation zum proximalen Interphalangealgelenk (PIP) und den Beugesehnen vor und nach Ruptur untersucht.

Ergebnisse Verletzungen des A2- und A4-Ringbandes konnten im Ultraschall mit einer Sensitivität von 90 % und 94 % und einer Spezifität von 100 % bzw. 97 % diagnostiziert werden. Eine direkte Visualisierung des A3-Ringbandes gelang in 61 % der Finger. Die VP wurde signifikant dicker und kürzer während der Fingerflexion, auch bei einer A3-Ringbandruptur. Die Distanz zwischen Beugesehne und VP wurde bei einer A3-Ringbandruptur signifikant größer. Für einen Abstand von größer als 0,9 mm zwischen der VP und der Beugesehne ergab sich eine Sensitivität von 76 % und eine Spezifität von 94 % bezüglich der Diagnose einer A3-Ringbandruptur.

Schlussfolgerung Der Abstand zwischen der VP und der Beugesehne zeigte sich als valides diagnostisches Kriterium bezüglich einer A3-Ringbandruptur. Diese Methode repräsentiert die erste ultraschallgesteuerte Methode für die akkurate Diagnose einer A3-Ringbandruptur.

Key words

sport climbing - finger injury - volar plate - pulley

Schlüsselwörter

Sportklettern - Ringbandverletzung - Fingerverletzung - Voller-Platte
 

  • References

  • 1 Lutter C, El-Sheikh Y, Schoffl I. et al. Sport climbing: medical considerations for this new Olympic discipline. Br J Sports Med 2017; 51: 2-3
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Bollen SR, Gunson CK. Hand injuries in competition climbers. Br J Sports Med 1990; 24: 16-18
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Logan AJ, Makwana N, Mason G. et al. Acute hand and wrist injuries in experienced rock climbers. Br J Sports Med 2004; 38: 545-548
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Schöffl V, Popp D, Küpper T. et al. Injury distribution in rock climbers – A prospective evaluation of 911 injuries between 2009 – 2012. Wilderness Environ Med 2015; 26: 62-67
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Amis AA, Jones MM. The interior of the flexor tendon sheath of the finger. The functional significance of its structure. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1988; 70: 583-587
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Roloff I, Schöffl VR, Vigouroux L. et al. Biomechanical Model for the determination of the forces acting on the finger pulley system. J Biomech 2006; 39: 915-923
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Doyle JR. Anatomy of the finger flexor tendon sheath and pulley system. J Hand Surg [Am] 1988; 13: 473-484
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Bayer T, Schweizer A, Muller-Gerbl M. et al. Proximal interphalangeal joint volar plate configuration in the crimp grip position. The Journal of hand surgery 2012; 37: 899-905
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Watanabe H, Hashizume H, Inoue H. et al. Collagen framework of the volar plate of human proximal interphalangeal joint. Acta Med Okayama 1994; 48: 101-108
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Williams EH, McCarthy E, Bickel KD. The histologic anatomy of the volar plate. The Journal of hand surgery 1998; 23: 805-810
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Bollen SR. Injury to the A2 pulley in rock climbers. J Hand Surg [Br] 1990; 15: 268-270
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Hahn P, Lanz U. Die Ringbänder der Fingerbeugesehnen. Anatmoie, Biomechanik, Wiederherstellung. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 1996; 28: 265-270
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Schöffl V, Hochholzer T, Winkelmann HP. et al. Pulley injuries in rock climbers. Wilderness Environ Med 2003; 14: 94-100
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Marco RA, Sharkey NA, Smith TS. et al. Pathomechanics of closed rupture of the flexor tendon pulleys in rock climbers. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1998; 80: 1012-1019
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Walbeehm ET, McGrouther DA. An anatomical study of the mechanical interactions of flexor digitorum superficialis and profundus and the flexor tendon sheath in zone 2. J Hand Surg [Br] 1995; 20: 269-280
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Peterson JJ, Bancroft LW. Injuries of the fingers and thumb in the athlete. Clin Sports Med 2006; 25: 527-542 , vii-viii
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Schöffl V, Hochholzer T, Winkelmann HP. et al. Zur Therapie von Ringbandverletzungen bei Sportkletterern. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 2004; 36: 231-236
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Klauser A, Frauscher F, Bodner G. et al. Finger pulley injuries in extreme rock climbers: depiction with dynamic US. Radiology 2002; 222: 755-761
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Hauger O, Chung CB, Lektrakul N. et al. Pulley system in the fingers: normal anatomy and simulated lesions in cadavers at MR imaging, CT, and US with and without contrast material distention of the tendon sheath. Radiology 2000; 217: 201-212
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Martinoli C, Bianchi S, Nebiolo M. et al. Sonographic evaluation of digital annular pulley tears. Skeletal Radiol 2000; 29: 387-391
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Bodner G, Rudisch A, Gabl M. et al. Diagnosis of digital flexor tendon annular pulley disruption: comparison of high frequency ultrasound and MRI. Ultraschall in Med 1999; 20: 131-136
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Saito S, Suzuki S, Suzuki Y. Biomechanical differences of the proximal interphalangeal joint volar plate during active and passive motion: a dynamic ultrasonographic study. The Journal of hand surgery 2012; 37: 1335-1341
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Bayer T, Adler W, Schweizer A. et al. Evaluation of finger A3 pulley rupture in the crimp grip position-a magnetic resonance imaging cadaver study. Skeletal Radiol 44: 1279-1285
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Schoffl I, Hugel A, Schoffl V. et al. Diagnosis of Complex Pulley Ruptures Using Ultrasound in Cadaver Models. Ultrasound Med Biol 2016; DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2016.10.005.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Boutry N, Titecat M, Demondion X. et al. High-frequency ultrasonographic examination of the finger pulley system. J Ultrasound Med 2005; 24: 1333-1339
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Saito S, Suzuki Y. Biomechanics of the volar plate of the proximal interphalangeal joint: a dynamic ultrasonographic study. The Journal of hand surgery 2011; 36: 265-271
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar