CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · J Lab Physicians 2019; 11(03): 192-199
DOI: 10.4103/JLP.JLP_5_19
Original Article

Study of vancomycin and high-level aminoglycoside-resistant Enterococcus species and evaluation of a rapid spot test for enterococci from Central Referral Hospital, Sikkim, India

Tsering Yangzom
Department of Microbiology, Central Referral Hospital, Sikkim Manipal Institute of Medical Sciences, Sikkim Manipal University, Tadong, Sikkim, India
,
T. Shanti Kumar Singh
Department of Microbiology, Central Referral Hospital, Sikkim Manipal Institute of Medical Sciences, Sikkim Manipal University, Tadong, Sikkim, India
› Author Affiliations
Financial support and sponsorship This study was funded by Dr. Ramdas Pai and Mrs. Vasanthi Pai Endowment fund SMIMS, vide letter no. SMIMS/Letter/2016/150. F. A. No: Endow/019/ SMU/16-17.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Enterococcus is an important pathogen, and with its emergence of resistance to multiple antimicrobials, the management of infection is becoming increasingly difficult.

AIM: The aim of the study is to determine the prevalence, antibiotic resistance, and risk factors associated with enterococcal infection or colonization.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective study, samples from inpatients were screened for resistant enterococci. Antibiotic susceptibility testing was performed using the disc diffusion method and minimum inhibitory concentration by the agar dilution method. A modification of a test tube method of sodium chloride-esculin hydrolysis to a spot test was evaluated for its rapidity and reliability in the presumptive diagnosis of enterococci.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Fisher's exact test was used for continuous (Student's t-test) and categorical variables. Multivariate analysis was performed with logistic regression using IBM SPSS 20.0 software (Armonk, NY, USA).

RESULTS: Enterococcus species were isolated from 182 samples: Enterococcus faecalis (68.7%), Enterococcus faecium (20.9%), Enterococcus gallinarum (6%), and Enterococcus durans (4.4%). Maximum resistance was to ciprofloxacin (59.3%) and least to linezolid (0.5%). The isolation rate of vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) was 13.7%; 30.2% and 20.9% were of high-level gentamicin and streptomycin, respectively. All 182 Enterococcus species gave positive results within 30–60 min by the rapid spot test.

CONCLUSIONS: Overall, high-level aminoglycoside resistance (HLAR) was observed more than glycopeptide resistance. Surveillance strategies need to be upgraded and implemented in order to prevent the emergence and further spread of not only VRE but also HLAR enterococci in the hospital. The spot test gave reliable and rapid results in presumptive identification of enterococci.



Publication History

Received: 29 January 2019

Accepted: 27 July 2019

Article published online:
07 April 2020

© 2019.

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd.
A-12, Second Floor, Sector -2, NOIDA -201301, India

 
  • References

  • 1 Knudtson LM, Hartman PA. Routine procedures for isolation and identification of enterococci and fecal streptococci. Appl Environ Microbiol 1992;58:3027-31.
  • 2 Mundy LM, Sahm DF, Gilmore M. Relationships between enterococcal virulence and antimicrobial resistance. Clin Microbiol Rev 2000;13:513-22.
  • 3 Winn WC, Koneman EW, Allen SD, Prop GW, Janda WM, Schreckenberger PC, et al. Enterococcus species. In: Koneman's Color Atlas and Textbook of Diagnostic Microbiology. 6th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2006. p. 700-4.
  • 4 Lebreton F, Willems RJ, Gilmore MS. Enterococcus Diversity, origins in nature, and gut colonization. In: Gilmore MS, Clewell DB, Ike Y, Shankar N, editors. Enterococci: From Commensals to Leading Causes of Drug Resistant Infection. Boston: Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary; 2014. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK190427/. [Last accessed on 2016 Dec 08].
  • 5 Faron ML, Ledeboer NA, Buchan BW. Resistance mechanisms, epidemiology, and approaches to screening for vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus in the health care setting. J Clin Microbiol 2016;54:2436-47.
  • 6 Cetinkaya Y, Falk P, Mayhall CG. Vancomycin-resistant enterococci. Clin Microbiol Rev 2000;13:686-707.
  • 7 Qadri SM, Flournoy DJ, Qadri SG. Sodium chloride-esculin hydrolysis test for rapid identification of enterococci. J Clin Microbiol 1987;25:1107-8.
  • 8 Types of Healthcare-Associated Infections. HAI. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/hai/infectiontypes.html. [Last accessed on 2017 Jan 09].
  • 9 Ergani-Ozcan A, Naas T, Baysan BO, Ogunc D, Inan D, Colak D, et al. Nosocomial outbreak of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium in a paediatric unit at a Turkish university hospital. J Antimicrob Chemother 2008;61:1033-9.
  • 10 Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. 26th ed. CLSI Supplement M100S. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2016. p. 45, 82-5.
  • 11 Facklam RR, Collins MD. Identification of Enterococcus species isolated from human infections by a conventional test scheme. J Clin Microbiol 1989;27:731-4.
  • 12 Hayakawa K, Marchaim D, Palla M, Gudur UM, Pulluru H, Bathina P, et al. Epidemiology of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecalis: A case-case-control study. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2013;57:49-55.
  • 13 Padmasini E, Padmaraj R, Ramesh SS. High level aminoglycoside resistance and distribution of aminoglycoside resistant genes among clinical isolates of Enterococcus species in Chennai, India. ScientificWorldJournal 2014;2014:329157.
  • 14 Ghoshal U, Garg A, Tiwari DP, Ayyagari A. Emerging vancomycin resistance in enterococci in India. Indian J Pathol Microbiol 2006;49:620-2.
  • 15 Gangurde N, Mane M, Phatale S. Prevalence of multidrug resistant enterococci in a tertiary care hospital in India: A growing threat. Open J Med Microbiol 2014;4:11-5.
  • 16 Tsai HY, Liao CH, Chen YH, Lu PL, Huang CH, Lu CT, et al. Trends in susceptibility of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium to tigecycline, daptomycin, and linezolid and molecular epidemiology of the isolates: Results from the tigecycline in vitro surveillance in Taiwan (TIST) study, 2006 to 2010. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2012;56:3402-5.
  • 17 Moemen D, Tawfeek D, Badawy W. Healthcare-associated vancomycin resistant Enterococcus faecium infections in the Mansoura University hospitals intensive care units, Egypt. Braz J Microbiol 2015;46:777-83.
  • 18 Purohit G, Gaind R, Dawar R, Verma PK, Aggarwal KC, Sardana R, et al. Characterization of vancomycin resistant enterococci in hospitalized patients and role of gut colonization. J Clin Diagn Res 2017;11:DC01-DC05.
  • 19 Tripathi A, Shukla SK, Singh A, Prasad KN. Prevalence, outcome and risk factor associated with vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium at a tertiary care hospital in Northern India. Indian J Med Microbiol 2016;34:38-45.
  • 20 Rengaraj R, Mariappan S, Sekar U, Kamalanadhan A. Detection of vancomycin resistance among Enterococcus faecalis and Staphylococcus aureus. J Clin Diagn Res 2016;10:DC04-6.
  • 21 Zirakzadeh A, Patel R. Vancomycin-resistant enterococci: Colonization, infection, detection, and treatment. Mayo Clin Proc 2006;81:529-36.
  • 22 D'Agata EM, Gautam S, Green WK, Tang YW. High rate of false-negative results of the rectal swab culture method in detection of gastrointestinal colonization with vancomycin-resistant enterococci. Clin Infect Dis 2002;34:167-72.
  • 23 Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci (VRE) and the Clinical Laboratory. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2010. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/hai/settings/lab/vreclinical-laboratory.html. [Last accessed on 2017 Jan 09].
  • 24 Pan SC, Wang JT, Chen YC, Chang YY, Chen ML, Chang SC. Incidence of and risk factors for infection or colonization of vancomycin-resistant enterococci in patients in the intensive care unit. PLoS One 2012;7:e47297.
  • 25 Edberg SC, Gam K, Bottenbley CJ, Singer JM. Rapid spot test for the determination of esculin hydrolysis. J Clin Microbiol 1976;4:180-4.