Consent-based Access to Core EHR Information

Summary

Objective: Lack of access to updated drug information is a challenge for healthcare providers in Norway. Drug charts are updated in separate EHR systems but exchange of drug information between them is lacking. In order to provide ready access to updated medication information, a project for consent-based access to a core EHR has been established.

Methods: End users have developed requirements for additions to the medication modules in the EHR systems in cooperation with vendors, researchers and standardization workers. The modules are then implemented by the vendors, tested in the usability lab, and finally tested by the national testing and approval service before implementation. An ethnographic study, with focus on future users and their interaction with other actors regarding medicines and medication, has included semi-/unstructured interviews with the involved organizational units.

Results: The core EHR uses the EHR kept by the patient’s regular GP as the main source of information. A server-based solution has been chosen in order to keep the core EHR accessible outside the GP’s regular work hours. The core EHR is being tested, and the EHR-vendors are implementing additions to their systems in order to facilitate communication with the core EHR. All major EHR-system vendors in Norway participate in the project.

Conclusions: The core EHR provides a generic basis that may be used as a pilot for a national patient summary. Examples of a wider use of the core EHR can be: shared individual plans to support continuity of care, summary of the patient’s contacts with health providers in different organizations, and core EHR information such as important diagnoses, allergies and contact information. Extensive electronic cooperation and communication requires that all partners adjust their documentation practices to fit with other actors’ needs. The implementation effects on future work practices will be followed by researchers.

Keywords

Consent - core EHR - EHR - patient summary - medication - information systems - socio-technical approaches - information infrastructure

• References

• 1 Teich JM, Marchibroda JM. Electronic Prescribing: Toward Maximum value and Rapid Adoption. Washington DC: eHealth Initiative; 2004
• 2 Jensen SA, Oien T, Jacobsen G, Johnsen R. Erroneous drug charts – a health hazard?. Tidsskrift for den Norske Laegeforening 2003: 3598-3599.
• 3 Nystadnes T. Solution Sketch – Lighthouse Project Trondheim: Medication Information in Consent-Based Core EHR (in Norwegian). KITH-report 29/2005.
• 4 Berntsen KE, Hamre GA. As yet unpublished data from ethnographically inspired study of healthcare outside hospitals. NTNU – IDI, 2007/2008.
• 5 Teamwork 2007 (in Norwegian).. Directorate of Health and Welfare (ed). Norwegian Government; 2007
• 6 Commission of European Communities: eHealth: Making Health Care Better for European citizens – An Action Plan for a European eHealth Arena. COM; 2004: 356.
• 7 Myers MD, Avison D. Qualitative Research in Information Systems. London: Sage Publications; 2002
• 8 Bowker GC, Star SL. Sorting Things Out. Classification and its consequences. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press; 1999
• 9 Doosselaere Cv, Wilson P, Herweg J, Silber D. eHealth... but is it legal?. Eurohealth 2007; 13: 1-4.
• 10 KITH. Cooperation Architecture for the Health Sector. (in Norwegian). KITH; 2006
• 11 Kuhn KA, Wurst SHR, Bott OJ, Giuse DA. Expanding the Scope of Health Information Systems: Challenges and Developments. IMIA Yearbook of Medical Informatics 2006. Methods Inf Med 2006; 45 (01) 43-52.
• 12 Braa J, Monteiro E, Sahay S. Networks of Action: Sustainable Health Information Systems Across Developing Countries. MIS Quarterly 2004; 28: 337-362.
• 13 Ciborra CA. From Control to Drift. The dynamics of Corporate Information Infrastructures. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2000
• 14 Blobel B. Advanced and secure architectural EHR approaches. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2006; 75: 185-190.