Automatic Heart Rate Normalization for Accurate Energy Expenditure Estimation

Summary

Introduction: This article is part of the Focus Theme of Methods of Information in Medicine on “Pervasive Intelligent Technologies for Health”.

Background: Energy Expenditure (EE) estimation algorithms using Heart Rate (HR) or a combination of accelerometer and HR data suffer from large error due to inter-person differences in the relation between HR and EE. We recently introduced a methodology to reduce inter-person differences by predicting a HR normalization parameter during low intensity Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). By using the HR normalization, EE estimation performance was improved, but conditions for performing the normalization automatically in daily life need further analysis. Sedentary lifestyle of many people in western societies urge for an in-depth analysis of the specific ADLs and HR features used to perform HR normalization, and their effects on EE estimation accuracy in participants with varying Physical Activity Levels (PALs).

Objectives: To determine 1) which low intensity ADLs and HR features are necessary to accurately determine HR normalization parameters, 2) whether HR variability (HRV) during ADLs can improve accuracy of the estimation of HR normalization parameters, 3) whether HR normalization parameter estimation from different ADLs and HR features is affected by the participants’ PAL, and 4) what is the impact of different ADLs and HR features used to predict HR normalization parameters on EE estimation accuracy.

Methods: We collected reference EE from indirect calorimetry, accelerometer and HR data using one single sensor placed on the chest from 36 participants while performing a wide set of activities. We derived HR normalization parameters from individual ADLs (lying, sedentary, walking at various speeds), as well as combinations of sedentary and walking activities. HR normalization parameters were used to normalized HR and estimate EE.

Results: From our analysis we derive that 1) HR normalization using resting activities alone does not reduce EE estimation error in participants with different reported PALs. 2) HRV features did not show any significant improvement in RMSE. 3) HR normalization parameter estimation was found to be biased in participants with different PALs when sedentary-only data was used for the estimation. 4) EE estimation error was not reduced when normalization was carried out using sedentary activities only. However, using data from walking at low speeds improved the results significantly (30–36%).

Conclusion: HR normalization parameters able to reduce EE estimation error can be accurately estimated from low intensity ADLs, such as sedentary activities and walking at low speeds (3 – 4 km/h), regardless of reported PALs. However, sedentary activities alone, even when HRV features are used, are insufficient to estimate HR normalization parameters accurately.

Keywords

Energy expenditure - heart rate - wearable sensors - personalization

• References

• 1 Bidargaddi NP, Sarela A. Activity and heart rate-based measures for outpatient cardiac rehabilitation. Methods Inf Med 2008; 47 (03) 208-216.
• 2 Wild S. et al. Global prevalence of diabetes: estimates for the year 2000 and projections for 2030. Diabetes Care 2004; 27 (05) 1047-1053.
• 3 Makikawa M. et al. Microprocessor-based memory device for ambulatory heart rate and physical activity recording. Methods Inf Med 1994; 33 (01) 94-96.
• 4 Strath SJ. et al. Simultaneous heart rate-motion sensor technique to estimate energy expenditure. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2001; 33 (12) 2118-2123.
• 5 Assah FK. et al. Accuracy and validity of a combined heart rate and motion sensor for the measurement of free-living physical activity energy expenditure in adults in Cameroon. International journal of epidemiology 2011; 40 (01) 112-120.
• 6 Brage S. et al. Hierarchy of individual calibration levels for heart rate and accelerometry to measure physical activity. J Appl Physiol 2007; 103: 68292
• 7 Bonomi AG. et al. Improving assessment of daily energy expenditure by identifying types of physical activity with a single accelerometer. J Appl Physiol 2009; 107 (03) 655-661.
• 8 Tapia E. Using machine learning for real-time activity recognition and estimation of energy expenditure. Dissertation. MIT 2008
• 9 Altini M. et al. Energy Expenditure Estimation Using Wearable Sensors: A New Methodology for Activity-Specific Models. In: Wireless Health 2012
• 10 Rowell LB. Circulation. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. 1969: 15-22.
• 11 Parkka J. et al. Automatic feature selection and classification of physical and mental load using data from wearable sensors. Information Technology and Applications in Biomedicine (ITAB) 2010
• 12 Gietzelt M. et al. Measurement of Accelerometry-based Gait Parameters in People with and without Dementia in the Field. Methods Inf Med 2013; 52: 319-325.
• 13 Altini M. et al. Personalizing energy expenditure estimation using a cardiorespiratory fitness predicate. Pervasive Health 2013. In press
• 14 George JD. et al. Development of a submaximal treadmill jogging test for fit college-aged individuals. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1993; 25: 643-647.
• 15 Katzmarzyk PT. et al. Physical activity, sedentary behavior, and health: paradigm paralysis or paradigm shift?. Diabetes 2010; 59: 2717-2725.
• 16 Esco MR. et al. Cross-Validation of the Polar Fitness Test via the Polar F11 Heart Rate Monitor in Predicting VO2Max. Journal of Exercise Physiology 2011
• 17 Buchheit M. et al. Heart rate variability and intensity of habitual physical activity in middle-aged persons. Medicine and science in sports and exercise 2005; 37 (09) 1530
• 18 Lee CM. et al. Dissociation of heart rate variability and heart rate recovery in well-trained athletes. European journal of applied physiology 2012; 112 (07) 2757-2766.
• 19 Esco MR. et al. The relationship between resting heart rate variability and heart rate recovery. Clinical Autonomic Research 2010; 20 (01) 33-38.
• 20 Grant C. et al. Relationship between exercise capacity and heart rate variability: Supine and in response to an orthostatic stressor. Autonomic Neuroscience 2009; 151 (02) 186-188.
• 21 Lee DC. et al. Mortality trends in the general population: the importance of cardiorespiratory fitness. J Psychopharmacol 2010; 24: 27-35.
• 22 Bassett DR. et al. Calibration and validation of wearable monitors. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2012; 44 (1 Suppl 1) S32-38.
• 23 Altini M. et al. A low-power multi-modal body sensor network with application to epileptic seizure monitoring. In: EMBC 2011: 1806-1809.
• 24 McLaughlin JG. et al. Validation of the Cosmed K4b2 portable metabolic system. Int J Sports Med 2001; 22: 280-284.
• 25 Berntson G. et al. Heart rate variability: origins, methods, and interpretive caveats. Psychophysiology 1997; 34: 623-648.
• 26 Loimaala A. et al. Controlled 5-mo aerobic training improves heart rate but not heart rate variability or baroreflex sensitivity. Journal of Applied Physiology 2000; 1825-1829.
• 27 Boutcher SH. et al. Association between heart rate variability and training response in sedentary middle-aged men. European journal of applied physiology 1995; 70 (01) 75-80.
• 28 Tulppo MP. et al. Vagal modulation of heart rate during exercise: effects of age and physical fitness. Heart and Circulatory Physiology 1998; 274 (02) H424-H429.
• 29 Melanson EL. et al. The effect of endurance training on resting heart rate variability in sedentary adult males. European journal of applied physiology 2001; 85 (05) 442-449.