Methods Inf Med 2014; 53(01): 21-28
DOI: 10.3414/ME12-01-0109
Original Articles
Schattauer GmbH

Regularization in Deformable Registration of Biomedical Images Based on Divergence and Curl Operators

S. Riyahi-Alam
1   Department of Mechanical and Aerospace, Biomedical Engineering, Politecnico di Torino, Torino, Italy
,
M. Peroni
2   Paul Scherrer Institut, Zentrum für Protonentherapie, WMSA/C15, Villigen PSI, Switzerland
,
G. Baroni
3   Dipartimento di Elettronica, Informazione e Bioingegneria, Politecnico di Milano, Milano, Italy
4   Bioengineering Unit, Centro Nazionale di Adroterapia Oncologica, Pavia, Italy
,
M. Riboldi
3   Dipartimento di Elettronica, Informazione e Bioingegneria, Politecnico di Milano, Milano, Italy
4   Bioengineering Unit, Centro Nazionale di Adroterapia Oncologica, Pavia, Italy
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

received: 01 December 2012

accepted: 21 July 2013

Publication Date:
20 January 2018 (online)

Summary

Background: Similarity measures in medical images do not uniquely determine the correspondence between two voxels in deformable image registration. Uncertainties in the final computed deformation exist, questioning the actual physiological consistency of the deformation between the two images.

Objectives: We developed a deformable image registration method that regularizes the deformation field in order to model a deformation with physiological properties, relying on vector calculus based operators as a regularization function.

Method: We implemented a 3D multi-resolution parametric deformable image registration, containing divergence and curl of the deformation field as regularization terms. Exploiting a BSpline model, we fit the transformation to optimize histogram-based mutual information similarity measure. In order to account for compression/expansion, we extract sink/source/circulation components as irregularities in the warped image and compensate them. The registration performance was evaluated using Jacobian determinant of the deformation field, inverse-consistency, landmark errors and residual image difference along with displacement field errors. Finally, we compare our results to a robust combination of second derivative regularization, as well as to non-regularized methods.

Results: The implementation was tested on synthetic phantoms and clinical data, leading to increased image similarity and reduced inverse-consistency errors. The statistical analysis on clinical cases showed that regularized methods are able to achieve better image similarity than non regularized methods. Also, divergence/curl regularization improves anatomical landmark errors compared to second derivative regularization.

Conclusion: The implemented divergence/ curl regularization was successfully tested, leading to promising results in comparison with competitive regularization methods. Future work is required to establish parameter tuning and reduce the computational cost.

 
  • References

  • 1 Kaus MR, Brock KK. Deformable image registration for radiation therapy planning: Algorithms and applications. In:. Leondes CT. editor. Biomechanical systems technology. World Scientific Publishing 2007; pp 1-28.
  • 2 Chao M, Xie Y, Xing L. Auto-propagation of contours for adaptive prostate radiation therapy. Phys Med Biol 2008; 53: 4533-4542.
  • 3 Peroni M, Ciardo D, Spadea MF, Riboldi M, Comi S, Alterio D. et al Automatic Segmentation and Online virtual CT in Head-and-Neck Adaptive Radiation Therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2012; 84 (03) 427-433.
  • 4 Riboldi M, Orecchia R, Baroni G. Real-time tumour tracking in particle therapy: technological developments and future perspectives. Lancet Oncol 2012; 13: 383-391.
  • 5 Torshabi AE, Pella A, Riboldi M, Baroni G. Targeting accuracy in real-time tumor tracking via external surrogates: a comparative study. Technol Cancer Res Treat 2010; 9: 551-562.
  • 6 Seregni M, Pella A, Riboldi M, Orecchia R, Cerveri P, Baroni G. Real-time tumor tracking with an artificial neural networks-based method: A feasibility study. Phys Med Forthcoming 2011
  • 7 Schaerer J, Fassi A, Riboldi M, Cerveri P, Baroni G, Sarrut D. Multi-dimensional respiratory motion tracking from markerless optical surface imaging based on deformable mesh registration. Phys Med. Biol 2012; 57: 357-373.
  • 8 Sarrut D. Deformable registration for image-guided radiation therapy. Z Med Phys 2006; 16: 285-297.
  • 9 Rueckert D, Sonoda LI, Hayes C, Hill DLG, Leach MO, Hawkes DJ. Nonrigid registration using free-form deformations: Application to breast MR images. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 1999; 18: 712-721.
  • 10 Staring M. Regularization in deformable registration. 13th International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention; Beijing, China 2010
  • 11 Vercauteren T, Pennec X, Perchant A, Ayache N. Non-parametric diffeomorphic image registration with the demons algorithm: Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (MICCAI); 2007; Lecture Notes in Computer Science. 2007 4792. 319-326.
  • 12 Sorzano CS, Thévenaz P, Unser M. Elastic registration of biological images using vector-spline regularization. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 2005; 52: 652-563.
  • 13 Arganda-Carreras I, Sorzano CS, Marabini R, Carazo JM, Ortiz-de Solorzano C, Kybic J. Consistent and elastic registration of histological sections using vector-spline regularization. Proceedings of the Second ECCV international conference on Computer Vision Approaches to Medical Image Analysis. 2006. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; 2006. pp 85-95.
  • 14 Klein S, Staring M, Pluim JP. Evaluation of optimization methods for nonrigid medical image registration using mutual information and B-splines. IEEE Transactions On Image Processing 2007; 16: 2879-2890.
  • 15 Ibanez L, Schroeder W, Ng L, Cates J. The ITK software guide. Insight Toolkit Kitware Inc 2003
  • 16 Rohlfing T. Image Similarity and Tissue Overlaps as Surrogates for Image Registration Accuracy: Widely Used but Unreliable. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 2012; 31 (02) 153-163.
  • 17 Plastimatch [Internet]. Available from http://www.plastimatch.org
  • 18 Peroni M, Golland P, Sharp GC, Baroni G. Ranking of stopping criteria for log domain diffeomorphic demons application in clinical radiation therapy. 33rd Annual International Conference of the IEEE EMBS: Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2011; pp 4884-4887.
  • 19 Rohlfing T, Maurer CR, Bluemke Jr DA. Jacobs MA. Volume-preserving nonrigid registration of MR breast images using free-form deformation with an incompressibility constraint. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 2003; 22: 730-741.
  • 20 Urschler M, Kluckner S, Bischof H. A Framework for comparison and evaluation of nonlinear intra-subject image registration algorithms. Institute of Computer Graphics and Vision, Graz, University of Technology, Austria. Insight Journal 2008
  • 21 Sharp GC, Li R, Wolfgang J, Chen G, Peroni M, Spadea MF. et al. Plastimatch - An open source software suite for radiotherapy image processing. Proceedings of the XVIth International Conference on the use of Computers in Radiotherapy (ICCR); Amsterdam, Netherlands