Download PDF
Methods Inf Med 2011; 50(05): 420-426
DOI: 10.3414/ME10-01-0040
Original Articles
Schattauer GmbH

Sensor-based Fall Risk Assessment – an Expert ‘to go’

M. Marschollek
1   Peter L. Reichertz Institute for Medical Informatics, University of Braunschweig – Institute of Technology and Hanover Medical School, Hanover, Germany
,
A. Rehwald
2   Peter L. Reichertz Institute for Medical Informatics, University of Braunschweig – Institute of Technology and Hanover Medical School, Braunschweig, Germany
,
K. H. Wolf
2   Peter L. Reichertz Institute for Medical Informatics, University of Braunschweig – Institute of Technology and Hanover Medical School, Braunschweig, Germany
,
M. Gietzelt
2   Peter L. Reichertz Institute for Medical Informatics, University of Braunschweig – Institute of Technology and Hanover Medical School, Braunschweig, Germany
,
G. Nemitz
3   Braunschweig Medical Center, Department for Geriatric Medicine, Braunschweig, Germany
,
H. Meyer zu Schwabedissen
3   Braunschweig Medical Center, Department for Geriatric Medicine, Braunschweig, Germany
,
R. Haux
2   Peter L. Reichertz Institute for Medical Informatics, University of Braunschweig – Institute of Technology and Hanover Medical School, Braunschweig, Germany
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

received: 27 May 2010

accepted: 24 January 2010

Publication Date:
18 January 2018 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Summary

Background: Falls are a predominant problem in our aging society, often leading to severe somatic and psychological consequences, and having an incidence of about 30% in the group of persons aged 65 years or above. In order to identify persons at risk, many assessment tools and tests have been developed, but most of these have to be conducted in a supervised setting and are dependent on an expert rater.

Objectives: The overall aim of our research work is to develop an objective and unobtrusive method to determine individual fall risk based on the use of motion sensor data. The aims of our work for this paper are to derive a fall risk model based on sensor data that may potentially be measured during typical activities of daily life (aim #1), and to evaluate the resulting model with data from a one-year follow-up study (aim #2).

Methods: A sample of n = 119 geriatric inpatients wore an accelerometer on the waist during a Timed ‘Up & Go’ test and a 20 m walk. Fifty patients were included in a one-year follow-up study, assessing fall events and scoring average physical activity at home in telephone interviews. The sensor data were processed to extract gait and dynamic balance parameters, from which four fall risk models – two classification trees and two logistic regression models – were computed: models CT#1 and SL#1 using accelerometer data only, models CT#2 and SL#2 including the physical activity score. The risk models were evaluated in a ten-times tenfold cross-validation procedure, calculating sensitivity (SENS), speci ficity (SPEC), positive and negative predictive values (PPV, NPV), classification accuracy, area under the curve (AUC) and the Brier score.

Results: Both classification trees show a fair to good performance (models CT#1/ CT#2): SENS 74% / 58%, SPEC 96% / 82%, PPV 92% / 74%, NPV 77%/82%, accuracy 80% / 78%, AUC 0.83 / 0.87 and Brier scores 0.14 / 0.14. The logistic regression models (SL#1/ SL#2) perform worse: SENS 42% / 58%, SPEC 82% / 78%, PPV 62% / 65%, NPV 67% / 72%, accuracy 65% /70%, AUC 0.65 / 0.72 and Brier scores 0.23 / 0.21.

Conclusions: Our results suggest that accelerometer data may be used to predict falls in an unsupervised setting. Furthermore, the parameters used for prediction are measurable with an unobtrusive sensor device during normal activities of daily living. These promising results have to be validated in a larger, long-term prospective trial.

Keywords

Accidental falls - motor activity - assisted living facilities - sensors
 

  • References

  • 1 Salva A, Bolibar I, Pera G, Arias C. Incidence and consequences of falls among elderly people living in the community. Med Clin (Barc) 2004; 122 (05) 172-176.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Kannus P, Sievanen H, Palvanen M, Jarvinen T, Parkkari J. Prevention of falls and consequent in-juries in elderly people. Lancet 2005; 366 9500 1885-1893.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Tinetti ME, Mendes de Leon CF, Doucette JT, Baker DI. Fear of falling and fall-related efficacy in relationship to functioning among community-living elders. J Gerontol 1994; 49 (03) M140-147.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Stevens JA, Corso PS, Finkelstein EA, Miller TR. The costs of fatal and non-fatal falls among older adults. Inj Prev 2006; 12 (05) 290-295.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Gates S, Smith LA, Fisher JD, Lamb SE. Systematic review of accuracy of screening instruments for predicting fall risk among independently living older adults. J Rehabil Res Dev 2008; 45 (08) 1105-1116.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Tinetti ME. Performance-oriented assessment of mobility problems in elderly patients. J Am Geriatr Soc 1986; 34 (02) 119-126.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Oliver D, Britton M, Seed P, Martin FC, Hopper AH. Development and evaluation of evidence based risk assessment tool (STRATIFY) to predict which elderly inpatients will fall: case-control and cohort studies. Bmj 1997; 315 7115 1049-1053.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Podsiadlo D, Richardson S. The timed “Up & Go”: a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. J Am Geriatr Soc 1991; 39 (02) 142-148.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Oliver D, Papaioannou A, Giangregorio L, Thabane L, Reizgys K, Foster G. A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies using the STRATIFY tool for prediction of falls in hospital patients: how well does it work?. Age Ageing 2008; 37 (06) 621-627.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Hendrich A, Nyhuis A, Kippenbrock T, Soja ME. Hospital falls: development of a predictive model for clinical practice. Appl Nurs Res 1995; 8 (03) 129-139.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Kim EA, Mordiffi SZ, Bee WH, Devi K, Evans D. Evaluation of three fall-risk assessment tools in an acute care setting. J Adv Nurs 2007; 60 (04) 427-435.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Giansanti D. Investigation of fall-risk using a wearable device with accelerometers and rate gyroscopes. Physiol Meas 2006; 27 (11) 1081-1090.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Laessoe U, Hoeck HC, Simonsen O, Sinkjaer T, Voigt M. Fall risk in an active elderly population – can it be assessed?. J Negat Results Biomed 2007; 6: 2.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Heinze C, Halfens RJ, Dassen T. Falls in German in-patients and residents over 65 years of age. J Clin Nurs 2007; 16 (03) 495-501.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Gietzelt M, Nemitz G, Wolf KH, Meyer zu Schwabedissen H, Haux R, Marschollek M. A clinical study to assess fall risk using a single waist accelerometer. Inform Health Soc Care 2009; 34 (04) 181-188.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Stevens JA, Powell KE, Smith SM, Wingo PA, Sattin RW. Physical activity, functional limitations, and the risk of fall-related fractures in community-dwelling elderly. Ann Epidemiol 1997; 7 (01) 54-61.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Lamb SE, Jorstad-Stein EC, Hauer K, Becker C. Development of a common outcome data set for fall injury prevention trials: the Prevention of Falls Network Europe consensus. J Am Geriatr Soc 2005; 53 (09) 1618-1622.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Voorrips LE, Ravelli AC, Dongelmans PC, Deurenberg P, Van Staveren WA. A physical activity questionnaire for the elderly. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1991; 23 (08) 974-979.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Hertogh EM, Monninkhof EM, Schouten EG, Peeters PH, Schuit AJ. Validity of the Modified Baecke Questionnaire: comparison with energy expenditure according to the doubly labeled water method. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2008; 5: 30.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Pols MA, Peeters PH, Bueno-De-Mesquita HB, Ocke MC, Wentink CA, Kemper HC. et al. Validity and repeatability of a modified Baecke questionnaire on physical activity. Int J Epidemiol 1995; 24 (02) 381-388.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Pols MA, Peeters PH, Kemper HC, Collette HJ. Repeatability and relative validity of two physical activity questionnaires in elderly women. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1996; 28 (08) 1020-1025.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Gietzelt M, Wolf KH, Marschollek M, Haux R. Automatic Self-Calibration of Born-Worn Triaxial Accelerometers for Application in Healthcare. In: Pervasive Health 2008. IEEE; 2008
    Google Scholar
  • 23 Gietzelt M. Conceptual design, implementation and evaluation of a method for automated fall risk assessment (Konzeption, Implementierung und Evaluation einer Methode zur automatisierten Sturzrisikoerkennung) (Diploma thesis). Braunschweig: Braunschweig Institute of Technology; 2008
    Google Scholar
  • 24 Marschollek M, Wolf KH, Gietzelt M, Nemitz G, Meyer zu Schwabedissen H, Haux R. Assessing elderly persons’ fall risk using spectral analysis on accelerometric data – a clinical evaluation study. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2008 pp 3682-3685.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Breiman L, Friedman J, Stone C, Olshen RA. Classification and Regression Trees. Chapman & Hall/ CRC; 1984
    Google Scholar
  • 26 de Rooij SE, Abu-Hanna A, Levi M, de Jonge E. Identification of high-risk subgroups in very elderly intensive care unit patients. Critical Care 2007; 11 (R33)
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Witten IH, Frank E. Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques. Second Edition. Morgan Kaufmann Series in Data Management Systems. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc.; 2005
    Google Scholar
  • 28 Ikeda M, Itoh S, Ishigaki T, Yamauchi K. Application of resampling techniques to the statistical analysis of the Brier score. Methods Inf Med 2001; 40 (03) 259-264.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Marschollek M, Nemitz G, Gietzelt M, Wolf KH, Meyer zu Schwabedissen H, Haux R. Predicting in-patient falls in a geriatric clinic: a clinical study combining assessment data and simple sensory gait measurements. Z Gerontol Geriatr 2009; 42 (04) 317-321.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Verghese J, Holtzer R, Lipton RB, Wang C. Quantitative Gait Markers and Incident Fall Risk in Older Adults. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2009
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Chu LW, Chi I, Chiu AY. Incidence and predictors of falls in the Chinese elderly. Ann Acad Med Singapore 2005; 34 (01) 60-72.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Sieri T, Beretta G. Fall risk assessment in very old males and females living in nursing homes. Disabil Rehabil 2004; 26 (12) 718-723.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Hausdorff JM. Gait dynamics, fractals and falls: finding meaning in the stride-to-stride fluctuations of human walking. Hum Mov Sci 2007; 26 (04) 555-589.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Hausdorff JM, Rios DA, Edelberg HK. Gait variability and fall risk in community-living older adults: a 1-year prospective study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001; 82 (08) 1050-1056.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Chan BK, Marshall LM, Winters KM, Faulkner KA, Schwartz AV, Orwoll ES. Incident fall risk and physical activity and physical performance among older men: the Osteoporotic Fractures in Men Study. Am J Epidemiol 2007; 165 (06) 696-703.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Narayanan MR, Scalzi ME, Redmond SJ, Lord SR, Celler BG, Lovell NH. A wearable triaxial accelerometry system for longitudinal assessment of falls risk. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2008 pp 2840-2843.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Mathie MJ, Coster AC, Lovell NH, Celler BG, Lord SR, Tiedemann A. A pilot study of long-term monitoring of human movements in the home using accelerometry. J Telemed Telecare 2004; 10 (03) 144-151.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Marschollek M, Wolf KH, Plischke M, Ludwig W, Haux R, Mihailidis A. et al. People’s perceptions and expectations of assistive health-enabling technologies: an empirical study in Germany. Assist Technol 2009; 21 (02) 86-93.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Marschollek M, Ludwig W, Schapiewski I, Schriever E, Schubert R, Dybowski H. et al. Multimodal home monitoring of elderly people – first results from the LASS study. In: IEEE First International Workshop on Smart Homes for Tele-Health (SmarTel07); 2007. Niagara Falls, Canada (May 21-23): IEEE; 2007
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Bardram JE. Pervasive healthcare as a scientific discipline. Methods Inf Med 2008; 47 (03) 178-185.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Arnrich B, Mayora O, Bardram J. Pervasive or ubiquitous healthcare?. Methods Inf Med 2010; 49 (01) 65-66.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Arnrich B, Mayora O, Bardram J, Troster G. Pervasive healthcare: paving the way for a pervasive, user-centered and preventive healthcare model. Methods Inf Med 2010; 49 (01) 67-73.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Demiris G. Smart homes and ambient assisted living in an aging society. New opportunities and challenges for biomedical informatics. Methods Inf Med 2008; 47 (01) 56-57.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Horwitz CM, Mueller M, Wiley D, Tentler A, Bocko M, Chen L. et al. Is home health technology adequate for proactive self-care?. Methods Inf Med 2008; 47 (01) 58-62.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Lord SR, Sherrington C, Menz HB, Close JCT. Falls in Older People: Risk Factors and Strategies for Prevention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2007
    Google Scholar
  • 46 Fensli R, Pedersen PE, Gundersen T, Hejlesen O. Sensor acceptance model – measuring patient acceptance of wearable sensors. Methods Inf Med 2008; 47 (01) 89-95.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar