Methods Inf Med 2010; 49(05): 501-505
DOI: 10.3414/ME09-02-0045
Special Topic – Original Articles
Schattauer GmbH

Interferences between Baroreflex and Respiration

Evaluation by Symbolic Analysis and Conditional Entropy
F. Vallais
1   Dipartimento di Bioingegneria, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy
,
A. Porta
2   Department of Technologies for Health, Galeazzi Orthopaedic Institute, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
,
D. Lucini
3   Centro di Ricerca Terapia Neurovegetativa, Dipartimento di Scienze Cliniche “L. Sacco”, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
,
M. Pagani
3   Centro di Ricerca Terapia Neurovegetativa, Dipartimento di Scienze Cliniche “L. Sacco”, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
,
F. Aletti
1   Dipartimento di Bioingegneria, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy
,
G. Baselli
1   Dipartimento di Bioingegneria, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

received: 26 October 2009

accepted: 08 February 2010

Publication Date:
17 January 2018 (online)

Summary

Background: The baroreflex is one of the most important short-term cardiovascular autonomic control mechanisms. Its interactions with other reflexes, mainly cardio-pulmonary reflexes, are of paramount importance in controlling heart rate.

Objectives: This study assesses the coupling between baroreflex and respiration during a progressive bicycle mild dynamical exercise.

Methods: The coupling was assessed by symbolic analysis and conditional entropy.

Results: Findings suggested the close relationship between the baroreflex sequences and the phase of respiratory signal and, thus, the interference between baroreflex and cardiopulmonary reflexes.

Conclusions: Indexes describing baroreflex based on spontaneous variability are strongly affected by cardiopulmonary influences.

 
  • References

  • 1 Lanfranchi PA, Somers VK. Arterial baroreflex function and cardiovascular variability: interactions and implications. Am J Physiol Regul 2002; 283: R815-826.
  • 2 Laude D, Elghozi JL, Girard A, Bellard E, Bouhaddi M, Castiglioni P, Cerutti C, Cividjian A, Di Rienzo M, Fortrat JO, Janssen B, Karemaker JM, Lefthériotis G, Parati G, Persson PB, Porta A, Quintin L, Regnard J, Rüdiger H, Stauss HM. Comparison of various techniques used to estimate spontaneous baroreflex sensitivity (the EuroBaVar study). Am J Physiol 2004; 286: R226-231.
  • 3 Vallais F, Baselli G, Lucini D, Pagani M, Porta A. Spontaneous baroreflex sensitivity estimates during graded bicycle exercise: a comparative study. Physiol Meas 2009; 30: 201-213.
  • 4 Rothlisberger BW, Badra LJ, Hoag JB, Cooke WH, Kuusela TA, Tahvanainen KU, Eckberg DL. Spontaneous “baroreflex sequences” occur as deterministic Methods Inf Med 5/2010 © Schattauer 2010 functions of breathing phase. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging 2003; 23: 307-313.
  • 5 Papoulis A, Pillai SU. Probability, random variables and stochastic processes. 4th ed. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY; 2002
  • 6 Lucini D, Dalla Vecchia L, Porta A, Malliani A, Pagani M. Non-invasive assessment of the changes in static and oscillatory components of peripheral pressure/flow relationships produced by moderate exercise in humans. J Hypertens 1997; 15: 1755-1760.
  • 7 Bertinieri G, Di Rienzo M, Cavallazzi A, Ferrari AU, Pedotti A, Mancia G. Evaluation of baroreceptor reflex by blood pressure monitoring in unanesthetized cats. Am J Physiol 1988; 254: H377-383.
  • 8 Censi F, Calcagnini G, Cerutti S. Coupling patterns between spontaneous rhythms and respiration in cardiovascular variability signals. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 2002; 68: 37-47.
  • 9 Eckberg DL. The human respiratory gate. J Physiol 2003; 548: 339-352.
  • 10 Porta A, Baselli G, Rimoldi O, Malliani A, Pagani M. Assessing baroreflex gain from spontaneous variability in conscious dogs: role of causality and respiration. Am J Physiol 2000; 279: H2558-H2567.