Download PDF
Gesundheitswesen 2006; 68(4): e6-e15
DOI: 10.1055/s-2006-926707
Leserbrief

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Risikobewertung Amalgam: Antwort auf Halbachs Kommentar

J. Mutter1 , J. Naumann1 , H. Walach1, 2, 3 , F. Daschner2
  • 1Institut für Umweltmedizin und Krankenhaushygiene, Universitätsklinik Freiburg
  • 2Samueli Institute, European Office, Northampton
  • 3School for Social Sciences, University of Northampton
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
17 May 2006 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Wir danken Herrn Prof. Dr. Halbach, dass er uns mit seinem Leserbrief Gelegenheit gibt, die kontroverse Diskussion zur Toxizität von Amalgam mit weiteren neuen wissenschaftlichen Daten fortzusetzen, welche nicht in unserer Risikobewertung berücksichtigt werden konnten. Diese Antwort stellt damit eine Fortsetzung und Ergänzung unserer Risikobewertung dar. Wir empfehlen dem Leser aber, nicht nur unsere Diskussion, sondern die ganze Risikobewertung zu lesen, ergänzend dazu dann Prof. Halbachs Kommentar und diese Antwort, um sich selbst einen Überblick über die Datenlage bilden zu können. Wegen der Bedeutung des Themas beziehen wir hier ausführlich Stellung (nach Kapiteln geordnet).

Literatur

  • 1 Mutter J, Naumann J, Walach H. et al . Amalgam: Eine Risikobewertung unter Berücksichtigung der neuen Literatur bis 2005. [Amalgam risk assessment with coverage of references up to 2005].  Gesundheitswesen. 2005;  67 204-216
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Bradstreet J. A case-control study of mercury burden in children with autistic Disorders and measles virus genomic RNA in cerebrospinal fluid in children with regressive autism. Immunization safety review: Vaccines and autism. Institute of Medicine, 9.2.2004. http://www.iom.edu/subpage.asp?id = 18 065 [20.10.2005]. 
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Holmes A S, Blaxill M F, Haley B E. Reduced levels of mercury in first baby haircuts of autistic children.  Int J Toxicol. 2003;  22 277-285
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Hu L W, Bernard J, Che. Neutron activation analysis of hair samples for the identification of autism.  Transactions of the American Nuclear Society. 2003;  v89 681-682
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Stenman S, Grans L. Symptoms and differential diagnosis of patients fearing mercury toxicity from amalgam fillings.  Scand J Work Environ Health. 1997;  23 (Suppl 3) 59-63
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Grandjean P, Weihe P, White R F. Milestone development in infants exposed to methylmercury from human milk.  Neurotoxicology. 1995;  16 27-33
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Nelson K B, Bauman M L. Thimerosal and autism?.  Pediatrics. 2003;  111 674-679
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Hargreaves R J, Evans J G, Janota I. et al . Persistent mercury in nerve cells 16 years after metallic mercury poisoning.  Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 1988;  14 443-452
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Takahata N, Hayashi H, Watanabe S. et al . Accumulation of mercury in the brains of two autopsy cases with chronic inorganic mercury poisoning.  Folia Psychiatr Neurol Jpn. 1970;  24 59-69
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Sugita M. The biological half-time of heavy metals. The existence of a third, „slowest” component.  Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 1978;  41 25-40
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Kishi R, Doi R, Fukuchi Y. et al . Residual neurobehavioural effects associated with chronic exposure to mercury vapour.  Occup Environ Med. 1994;  51 35-41
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 He F S, Zhow X R, Lin B X. et al . Prognosis of mercury poisoning in mercury refinery workers.  Ann Acad Med Singapore. 1984;  13 (2 Suppl.) 389-393
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Kaufmann T, Bloch C, Schmidt W. et al . Chronic inflammation and pain inside the mandibular jaw and a 10-year forgotten amalgam filling in an alveolar cavity of an extracted molar tooth.  Ultrastruct Pathol. 2005;  29 405-413
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Lechner J. Störfelder im Trigeminusbereich und Systemerkrankungen. Kötzting; Erich-Wühr-Verlag für Ganzheitliche Medizin 1999
    Google Scholar
  • 15 Halbach S. Entwarnung in Sachen Amalgam.  Apotheken-Umschau. 2005;  2 16-18
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 World Health Organisation (WHO) .Mercury in health care. Policy Paper. August 2005. http://www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/medicalwaste/mercurypolpaper.pdf [8.12.2005]. 
    Google Scholar
  • 17 Alsen-Hinrichs C. Entwarnung in Sachen Amalgam?.  Umwelt*medizin*Gesellschaft. 2005;  18 (4) 18
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Koller U, Halbach S. Amalgam - so schlecht wie sein Ruf?.  LZG Gesund in Bayern. 2004; September/Oktober: 6 - 7. http://www.lzg-bayern.de/download/gib/gib_04_5.pdf [7.12.2005]; 
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Letz R, Gerr F, Cragle D. et al . Residual neurologic deficits 30 years after occupational exposure to elemental mercury.  Neurotoxicology. 2000;  21 459-474
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Kobal A B, Horvat M, Prezelj M. et al . The impact of long-term past exposure to elemental mercury on antioxidative capacity and lipid peroxidation in mercury miners.  J Trace Elem Med Biol. 2004;  17 261-274
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 James S J, Slikker W 3rd, Melnyk S. et al . Thimerosal neurotoxicity is associated with glutathione depletion: protection with glutathione precursors.  Neurotoxicology. 2005;  26 1-8
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 James S J, Cutler P, Melnyk S. et al . Metabolic biomarkers of increased oxidative stress and impaired methylation capacity in children with autism.  Am J Clin Nutr. 2004;  80 1611-1617
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Stoiber T, Bonacker D, Bohm K J. et al . Disturbed microtubule function and induction of micronuclei by chelate complexes of mercury(II).  Mutat Res. 2004;  563 97-106
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Stoiber T, Degen G H, Bolt H M. et al . Interaction of mercury(II) with the microtubule cytoskeleton in IMR-32 neuroblastoma cells.  Toxicol Lett. 2004;  151 99-104
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Thier R, Bonacker D, Stoiber T. et al . Interaction of metal salts with cytoskeletal motor protein systems.  Toxicol Lett. 2003;  140 - 141 75-81
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Bonacker D, Stoiber T, Wang M. et al . Genotoxicity of inorganic mercury salts based on disturbed microtubule function.  Arch Toxicol. 2004;  78 575-583
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Mutter J, Naumann J, Schneider R. et al . Mercury and autism: accelerating evidence?.  Neuro Endocrinol Lett. 2005;  26 431-437
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Muhlendahl K E. Commentary regarding the article by Mutter et al. „Amalgam studies: Disregarding basic principles of mercury toxicity” [Int J Hyg Environ Health 2004; 207: 391 - 397].  Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2005;  208 435
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Mutter J, Naumann J, Sadaghiani C. et al . Mercury and autism: Response to the letter of K. E. v. Mühlendahl [Int J Hyg Environ Health 2005; 208: 435].  Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2005;  208 437-438
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Hornig M, Chian D, Lipkin W I. Neurotoxic effects of postnatal thimerosal are mouse strain dependent.  Mol Psychiatry. 2004;  9 (9) 833-845
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Bradstreet J, Geier D A, Kartzinel J J. et al . A case-control study of mercury burden in children with autistic spectrum disorders.  J Am Phys Surg. 2003;  8 76-79
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Palmer R F, Blanchard S, Stein Z. et al . Environmental mercury release, special education rates, and autism disorder: an ecological study of Texas.  Health Place. 2006;  12 203-209
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Autism Research Institute .Treatment options for mercury/metal toxicity in autism and related developmental disabilities. http://www.autismwebsite.com/ari/treatment/form34q.htm [20.10.2005]. 
    Google Scholar
  • 34 Burton D. Truth revealed: New scientific discoveries regarding mercury in medicine and autism. Opening statement before the U. S. House of Representatives. Subcommittee on human rights and wellness, Sept. 8 2004. http://reform.house.gov/WHR/Hearings/EventSingle.aspx?EventID = 18 156 [20.10.2005]. 
    Google Scholar
  • 35 Institute of Medicine (US) .Immunization Safety Review: Vaccines and Autism. Washington, DC; National Acedemy Press 2004
    Google Scholar
  • 36 Kennedy J R. Deadly immunity. 2005, June 16. http://www.house.gov/burton/article61605.htm [7.12.2005]. 
    Google Scholar
  • 37 Martinson B C, Anderson M S, de Vries R. Scientists behaving badly.  Nature. 2005;  435 737-738
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Taylor R, Giles J. Cash interests taint drug advice.  Nature. 2005;  437 1070-1071
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Angell M. The truth about drug companies: How they deceive us and what to do about it. New York; Random House 2004
    Google Scholar
  • 40 Pichichero M E, Cernichiari E, Lopreiato J. et al . Mercury concentrations and metabolism in infants receiving vaccines containing thiomersal: a descriptive study.  Lancet. 2002;  360 1737-1741
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Yel L, Brown L E, Su K. et al . Thimerosal induces neuronal cell apoptosis by causing cytochrome c and apoptosis-inducing factor release from mitochondria.  Int J Mol Med. 2005;  16 971-977
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Waly M, Olteanu H, Banerjee R. et al . Activation of methionine synthase by insulin-like growth factor-1 and dopamine: a target for neurodevelopmental toxins and thimerosal.  Mol Psychiatry. 2004;  9 358-370
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Deth R C. Truth revealed: New scientific discoveries regarding mercury in medicine and autism. Congressional Testimony before the U. S. House of Representatives. Subcommittee on human rights and wellness. 8.9.2004. http://reform.house.gov/WHR/Hearings/EventSingle.aspx?EventID = 18 156 [20.10.2005]. 
    Google Scholar
  • 44 Jedrychowski W, Jankowski J, Flak E. et al . Effects of prenatal exposure to mercury on cognitive and psychomotor function in one-year-old infants: epidemiologic cohort study in Poland.  Ann Epidemiol. 2005 in print; 
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Fischer R D. Truth revealed: New scientific discoveries regarding mercury in medicine and autism. Congressional Testimony before the U. S. House of Representatives. Subcommittee on human rights and wellness. 8.9.2004. http://reform.house.gov/WHR/Hearings/EventSingle.aspx?EventID = 18 156 [20.10.2005]. 
    Google Scholar
  • 46 Razagui I B, Haswell S J. Mercury and selenium concentrations in maternal and neonatal scalp hair: relationship to amalgam-based dental treatment received during pregnancy.  Biol Trace Elem Res. 2001;  81 1-19
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Arabi M. Bull spermatozoa under mercury stress.  Reprod Domest Anim. 2005;  40 454-459
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Podzimek S, Prochazkova J, Bultasova L. et al . Sensitization to inorganic mercury could be a risk factor for infertility.  Neuro Endocrinol Lett. 2005;  26 (4) in print
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Choy C M, Lam C W, Cheung L T. et al . Infertility, blood mercury concentrations and dietary seafood consumption: a case-control study.  BJOG. 2002;  109 1121-1125
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 The E uropean Environmental Bureau (EEB). Report form the international Conference „Toward a mercury-free world”. Madrid; 22.4.2005
    Google Scholar
  • 51 Echeverria D, Woods J S, Heyer N J. et al . Chronic low-level mercury exposure, BDNF polymorphism, and associations with cognitive and motor function.  Neurotoxicol Teratol. 2005;  27 781-796
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Heyer N J, Echeverria D, Bittner A C Jr. et al . Chronic low-level mercury exposure, BDNF polymorphism, and associations with self-reported symptoms and mood.  Toxicol Sci. 2004;  81 354-363
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 Hylander L D, Lindvall A, Gahnberg L. High mercury emissions from dental clinics despite amalgam separators.  Sci Total Environ. 2005 in print; 
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 54 Hylander L D, Lindvall A, Uhrberg R. et al . Mercury recovery in situ of four different dental amalgam separators.  Sci Total Environ. 2005; in print; 
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 55 Bender M. Taking a bite out of dental mercury pollution.  New England zero Mercury Campaign. 2005. http://www.mercurypolicy.org/new/documents/NEZMC_Report_Card_on_Dental_MercuryFINAL.pdf [20.10.2005]; 
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 56 Zeller D, Booth S. Costs and benefits of regulating mercury.  Science. 2005;  310 777-779
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 57 American Dental Association . Test Results/ADA finds 11 amalgam seperators exceed standard.  ADA Health & Science News. 18.2.2002; 
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 58 American Dental Association .ADA Responds To Amalgam Litigation. 28.6.2001. http://www.ada.org/members/ada/insite/comm/media/articles/0106/art-03.html. 
    Google Scholar
  • 59 Larkin M. Don’t remove amalgam fillings, urges American Dental Association.  Lancet. 2002;  3 360
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 60 Burton D. Mercury in medicine-taking unnecessary risks. A report prepared by the staff of the Subcommittee on Human Rights and Wellness Committee on Government Reform United States House of Representatives 2003. http://www.house.gov/burton/autism.htm [10.6.2005]. 
    Google Scholar
  • 61 Wassermann O, Weitz M, Alsen-Hinrichs C. Kieler Amalgamgutachten 1997. Institut für Toxikologie, Christian-Albrechts-Universität Kiel 1997 2. Aufl.
    Google Scholar
  • 62 Wassermann O, Weitz M, Alsen-Hinrichs C. Replik der Autoren des „Kieler Amalgamgutachtens 1997” zu der Stellungnahme der Autoren Prof. Dr. S. Halbach et al. 1999. Universitätsklinikum Kiel: Schriftenreihe des Instituts für Toxikologie 1999 Heft 44
    Google Scholar
  • 63 Staatsanwaltschaft des Landgerichtes Frankfurt (Dr. Schöndorf) .Verfügung. 65 Js 17 084.4/91. http: //people.blinx.de/sems/recht/dokument1.htm [29.11.2005]. 
    Google Scholar
  • 64 Hylander L D, Goodsite M E. Environmental costs of mercury pollution.  Sci Total Environ. 2006; in print; 
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 65 Echeverria D, Woods J S, Heyer N J. et al . The association between a genetic polymorphism of coproporphyrinogen oxidase, dental mercury exposure and neurobehavioral response in humans.  Neurotoxicol Teratol. 2006;  28 39-48
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 66 Kobal Grum D, Kobal A B, Arneric N. et al . Personality traits in miners with past occupational elemental mercury exposure.  Environ Health Perspect. 2006;  114 290-296
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 67 Guzzi G, Grandi M, Cattaneo C. et al . Dental Amalgam and mercury levels in autopsy tissues. Food for Thought.  Am I Forensic Med Pathol. 2006;  27 42-45
    PubMedGoogle Scholar

Dr. med. Joachim Mutter

Institut für Umweltmedizin und Krankenhaushygiene, Universitätsklinik Freiburg

Hugstetter Str. 55

79106 Freiburg

Email: joachim.mutter@uniklinik-freiburg.de