Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-825712
Stand der radiologischen Bildgebung in der Diagnostik von Erkrankungen der Nieren und oberen Harnwege bei Erwachsenen
State of Radiologic Imaging in the Diagnosis of Disorders of the Kidneys and Upper Urinary Tract in Adult PatientsPublication History
Publication Date:
19 July 2004 (online)
![](https://www.thieme-connect.de/media/rad-u2d/200402/lookinside/thumbnails/10.1055-s-2004-825712-1.jpg)
Zusammenfassung
In der bildgebenden Diagnostik der Nieren und ableitenden Harnwege vollzieht sich ein Wandel, fort von der klassischen urographischen Darstellung hin zu den modernen Schnittbildverfahren. Die vorliegende Übersicht erörtert den heutigen Stellenwert von intravenöser Urographie, Sonographie, CT und MRT für die Nieren- und Harnwegsdiagnostik bei erwachsenen Patienten. Der Schwerpunkt liegt auf der Effizienz moderner CT- und MR-Untersuchungstechniken zur Erfassung der für die Klinik relevanten diagnostischen Kriterien bei urologischen Erkrankungen wie Urolithiasis, Nierenzellkarzinom, intrinsischen und extrinsischen Harnwegstumoren sowie traumatischen Nierenverletzungen. Strategische Aspekte zum bevorzugten Einsatz der verschiedenen Modalitäten werden ebenfalls berücksichtigt.
Abstract
Diagnostic imaging of the kidneys and urinary tract presently undergoes a change from the classic urographic display to modern cross sectional imaging. This review article presents the current state of intravenous urography, ultrasonography, CT, and MRI for imaging the kidneys and the collecting system in adult patients. Major emphasis is on the efficiency of modern CT and MRI procedures in providing diagnostic information on clinically relevant urologic disorders, such as urolithiasis, renal cell carcinoma, intrinsic and extrinsic tumors of the urinary tract, and renal trauma. This includes the strategic aspects for the preferential use of the diverse modalities.
Key words
Kidneys - CT urinary tract - MR urinary tract - CT urography - MR urography - Renal cell carcinoma - Transitional cell carcinoma - Urolithiasis
Literatur
- 1 Allkemper T, Tombach B, Heindel W. Gd-BOPTA-gestützte MR-Ausscheidungsurographie ohne Diuretikagabe. Fortschr Röntgenstr. 2001; 173 115-120
- 2 Amis E S Jr. Epitaph for the urogram. Radiology. 1999; 213 639-640
- 3 Boridy I C, Nikolaidis P, Kawashima A, Goldman S M, Sandler C M. Ureterolithiasis: value of the tail sign in differentiating phleboliths from ureteral calculi at nonenhanced helical CT. Radiology. 1999; 211 619-621
- 4 Boulay I, Holtz P, Foley W D, White B, Begun F P. Ureteral calculi: diagnostic efficacy of helical CT and implications for treatment of patients. AJR. 1999; 172 1485-1490
- 5 Buckley J A, Urban B A, Soyer P, Scherrer A, Fishman E K. Transitional cell carcinoma of the renal pelvis: a retrospective look at CT staging with pathologic correlation. Radiology. 1996; 201 194-198
- 6 Catalano O, Fraioli F, Laghi A. et al . High-resolution multidetector CT in the preoperative evaluation of patients with renal cell carcinoma. AJR. 2003; 180 1271-1277
- 7 Catalano O, Nunziata A, Altei F, Siani A. Suspected ureteral colic: primary helical CT versus selective helical CT after unenhanced radiography and sonography. AJR. 2002; 178 379-387
- 8 Cohnen M, Jung G, Fritz B, Saleh A, Fürst G, Mödder U. Moderne bildgebende Verfahren: MR-Urographie. Urologe [A]. 2002; 41 542-547
- 9 Curry N S, Cochran S T, Bissada N K. Cystic renal masses: accurate Bosniak classification requires adequate renal CT. AJR. 2000; 175 339-342
- 10 Curry N S. Imaging of small solid renal mass. Abdom Imaging. 2002; 27 629-636
- 11 Dalla Palma L, Pozzi-Mucelli R, Stacul F. Present-day imaging of patients with renal colic. Eur Radiol. 2001; 11 4-17
- 12 Dalla Palma L. What is left of i. v. urography?. Eur Radiol. 2001; 11 931-939
- 13 Denton E R, Mackenzie A, Greenwell T, Popert R, Rankin S C. Unenhanced helical CT for renal colic: is the radiation dose justifiable?. Clin Radiol. 1999; 54 444-447
- 14 Etemad A, Brems-Dalgaard E, Thomsen H S. Outcome of intravenous urography in the year 2000. Abdom Imaging. 2003; 28 226-229
- 15 Fielding J R, Silverman S G, Samuel S, Zou K H, Loughlin K R. Unenhanced helical CT or ureteral stones: a replacement for excretory urography in planning treatment. AJR. 1998; 171 1051-1053
- 16 Fielding J R, Steele G, Fox L A, Heller H, Loughlin K R. Spiral computerized tomography in the evaluation of acute flank pain: a replacement for excretory urography. J Urol. 1997; 157 2071-2073
- 17 Filipas D, Spix C, Schulz-Lampel D, Michaelis J, Hohenfellner R, Roth S, Thüroff J W. Screening for renal cell carcinoma using ultrasonography: a feasibility study. BJU International. 2003; 91 595-599
- 18 Froom P, Ribak J, Benbassat J. Significance of microhaematuria in young adults. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1984; 288 20-22
- 19 Grossfeld G D, Litwin M S, Wolf J S Jr, Hricak H, Shuler C L, Agerter D C, Carrol P R. Evaluation of asymptomatic microscopic hematuria in adults: the American Urological Association best practice policy - part I: definition, detection, prevalence, and etiology. Urology. 2001; 57 599-603
- 20 Grossfeld G D, Litwin M S, Wolf J S, Hricak H, Shuler C L, Agerter D C, Carrol P R. Evaluation of asymptomatic microscopic hematuria in adults: the American Urological Association best practice policy - part II: patient evaluation, cytology, voided markers, imaging, cystoscopy, nephrology evaluation, and follow-up. Urology. 2001; 57 604-610
- 21 Hamm M, Knöpfle E, Wartenberg S, Wawroschek F, Weckermann D, Harzmann R. Low dose unenhanced helical computerized tomography fort he evaluation of acute flank pain. J Urol. 2002; 167 1687-1691
- 22 Harisinghani M G, Barentzs J, Hahn P F. et al . Noninvasive detection of clinically occult lymph-node metastases in prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2003; 348 2491-2499
- 23 Harris A C, Zwirewich C V, Lyburn I D, Torregiani W C, Marchinkow L O. CT findings in blunt renal trauma. Radiographics. 2001; 21 201-214
- 24 Heiss S G, Shifrin R Y, Sommer F G. Contrast-enhanced three-dimensional fast spoiled gradient-echo renal MR imaging: evaluation of vascular and nonvascular disease. Radiographics. 2000; 20 1341-1352
- 25 Hélénon O, Correas J M, Balleyguier C, Ghouadni M, Cornud F. Ultrasound of renal tumors. Eur Radiol. 2001; 11 1890-1901
- 26 Huda W. Radiation dosimetry in diagnostic radiology. AJR. 1997; 169 1487-1488
- 27 Israel G M, Bosniak M A. Calcification in cystic renal masses: is it important in diagnosis?. Radiology. 2003; 226 47-52
- 28 Israel G M, Bosniak M A. Follow-up of moderately complex cystic lesions of the kidney (Bosniak category IIF). AJR. 2003; 181 627-633
- 29 Jung P, Brauers A, Nolte-Ernsting C A, Jakse G, Günther R W. Magnetic resonance urography enhanced by gadolinium and diuretics: a comparison with conventional urography in diagnosing the cause of ureteric obstruction. BJU International. 2000; 86 960-965
- 30 Kopka L, Fischer U, Zoeller G, Schmidt C, Ringert R H, Grabbe E. Dual-phase helical CT of the kidney: value of the corticomedullary and nephrographic phase for evaluation of renal lesions and preoperative staging of renal cell carcinoma. AJR. 1997; 169 1573-1578
- 31 Kopka L, Rogalla P, Hamm B. Mehrschicht-Spiral-CT des Abdomens: Aktuelle Indikationen und zukünftige Trends. Fortschr Röntgenstr. 2002; 174 273-282
- 32 Krestin G P. Magnetic resonance imaging of the kidneys: current status. Magn Reson Q. 1994; 10 2-21
- 33 Kundra V, Silverman P M. Imaging in the diagnosis, staging, and follow-up of cancer of the urinary baldder. AJR. 2003; 180 1045-1054
- 34 Lang E K, Macchia R J, Thomas R. et al . Computerized tomography tailored for the assessment of microscopic hematuria. J Urol. 2002; 167 547-554
- 35 Lang E K, Macchia R J, Thomas R. et al . Improved detection of renal pathologic features on multiphasic helical CT compared with IVU in patients presenting with microscopic hematuria. Urology. 2003; 61 528-532
- 36 Levine J A, Neitlich J, Verga M, Dalrymple N, Smith R C. Ureteral calculi in patients with flank pain: corelation of plain radiography with unenhanced helical CT. Radiology. 1997; 204 27-31
- 37 Liu W, Esler S J, Kenny B J, Goh R H, Rainbow A J, Stevenson G W. Low-dose nonenhanced helical CT of renal colic: assessment of ureteric stone detection and measurement of effective dose equivalent. Radiology. 2000; 215 51-54
- 38 Miller O F, Rineer S K, Reichard S R. et al . Prospective comparison of unenhanced spiral computed tomography and intravenous urogram in the evaluation of acute flank pain. Urology. 1998; 52 982-987
- 39 Motley G, Dalrymple N, Keesling C, Fischer J, Harmon W. Hounsfield unit density in the determination of urinary stone composition. Urology. 2001; 58 170-173
- 40 Mueller-Lisse U G, Mueller-Lisse U L, Hinterberger J, Schneede P, Reiser M F. Tri-phasic MDCT in the diagnosis of urothelial cancer. Eur Radiol. 2003; 13 [Suppl 1] 146-147
- 41 Müller-Mattheis V, Seifert H, Ackermann R. Eine neue Sicht der Dinge. Urologe [A]. 2002; 41 540-541
- 42 Nakada S Y, Hoff D G, Attai S, Heisey D, Blankenbaker D, Pozniak M. Determination of stone composition by noncontrast spiral computed tomography in the clinical setting. Urology. 2000; 55 816-819
- 43 Nascimento A B, Mitchell D G, Zhang X-M. et al . Rapid MR imaging detection of renal cysts: age-based standards. Radiology. 2001; 221 628-632
- 44 Niall O, Russel J, MacGregor R, Duncan H, Mullins J. A comparison of noncontrast computerized tomography with excretory urography in the assessment of acute flank pain. J Urol. 1999; 161 534-537
- 45 Nikken J J, Krestin G P. Magnetic resonance in the diagnosis of renal masses. BJU International. 2000; 86 58-69
- 46 Nolte-Ernsting C, Bücker A, Adam G. et al . Gadolinium-enhanced excretory MR urography after low-dose diuretic injection: comparison with conventional excretory urography. Radiology. 1998; 209 147-157
- 47 Nolte-Ernsting C, Staatz G, Wildberger J, Adam G. MR-Urographie und CT-Urographie: Prinzipien, Untersuchungstechniken, Anwendungsmöglichkeiten. Fortschr Röntgenstr. 2003; 175 211-222
- 48 Nolte-Ernsting C CA, Staatz G, Tacke J, Günther R W. MR urography today. Abdom Imaging. 2003; 28 191-209
- 49 Nolte-Ernsting C CA, Tacke J, Adam G B, Haage P, Jung P, Jakse G, Günther R W. Diuretic-enhanced gadolinium excretory MR urography: comparison of conventional gradient-echo sequences and echo-planar imaging. Eur Radiol. 2001; 11 18-27
-
50 Plante P, Smayra T, Bouchard L, Joffre F, Seguin P, Escourrou G, Otal P.
Ureteral tumors. In: Joffre F, Otal P, Soulie M (Hrsg) Radiological Imaging of the ureter. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York; Springer 2003: 127-153 - 51 Ripollés T, Agramunt M, Errando J, Martinez M J, Coronel B, Morales M. Suspected ureteral colic: plain film and sonography vs unenhanced helical CT. A prospective study in 66 patients. Eur Radiol. 2004; 14 129-136
- 52 Rohrschneider W K, Haufe S, Clorius J H, Tröger J. MR to assess renal function in children. Eur Radiol. 2003; 13 1033-1045
- 53 Roubidoux M A, Dunnick N R, Sostman H D, Leder R A. Renal carcinoma: detection of venous extension with gradient-echo MR imaging. Radiology. 1992; 182 269-272
- 54 Ruppert-Kohlmayr A J, Stacher R, Preidler K W, Zigeuner R, Primus G, Ricabonna M, Szolar D H. Nativ-Spiral-Computertomographie bei Patienten mit akutem Flankenschmerz - Sinn oder Unsinn?. Fortschr Röntgenstr. 1999; 170 168-173
- 55 Saw K C, McAteer J A, Monga A G, Chua G T, Lingeman J E, Williams J C. Helical CT of urinary calculi: effect of stone composition, stone size, and scan collimation. AJR. 2000; 175 329-332
- 56 Schlichter A, Schubert R, Werner W, Zermann D H, Schubert J. How accurate is diagnostic imaging in determination of size and multifocality of renal cell carcinoma as a prerequisite for nephron-sparing surgery?. Urol Int. 2000; 64 192-197
- 57 Schmidt T, Hohl C, Haage P. et al . Diagnostic accuracy of phase-inversion tissue harmonic imaging versus fundamental B-mode sonography in the evaluation of focal lesions of the kidney. AJR. 2003; 180 1639-1647
- 58 Schoenberg S O, Bock M, Aumann S. et al . Quantitative Erfassung der renalen Funktion mit der Magnetresonanztomographie. Radiologe. 2000; 40 925-937
- 59 Schreyer H H, Uggowitzer M M, Ruppert-Kohlmayr A. Helical-CT of the urinary organs. Eur Radiol. 2002; 12 575-591
- 60 Schubert R A, Göckeritz S, Mentzel H J, Rzanny R, Schubert J, Kaiser W A. Imaging in ureteral complications of renal transplantation: value of static fluid MR urography. Eur Radiol. 2000; 10 1152-1157
- 61 Schwartz B F, Schenkman N, Armenakas N A, Stoller M L. Imaging characteristics of indinavir calculi. J Urol. 1999; 161 1085-1087
- 62 Scialpi M, di Maggio A, Midiri M. et al . Small renal masses: assessment of lesion characterization and vascularity on dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging with fat suppression. AJR. 2000; 175 751-757
- 63 Semelka R C, Shoenut J P, Kroeker M A. et al . renal lesions: controlled comparison between CT and 1.5-T MR imaging with nonenhanced and gadolinium-enhanced fat-suppressed spin-echo and breath-hold FLASH techniques. Radiology. 1992; 182 425-430
- 64 Semelka R C, Shoenut J P, Magro C M, Kroeker M A, MacMahon R, Greenberg H M. Renal cancer staging: comparison of contrast-enhanced fat-suppression spin-echo and gradient-echo MR imaging. JMRI. 1993; 3 597-602
- 65 Sheafor D H, Hertzberg B S, Freed K S. et al . Nonenhanced helical CT and US in the emergency evaluation of patients with renal colic: prospective comparison. Radiology. 2000; 217 792-797
- 66 Sheth S, Scatarige J C, Horton K M, Corl F M, Fishman E K. Current concepts in the diagnosis and management of renal cell carcinoma: role of multidetector CT and three-dimensional CT. Radiographics. 2001; 21 237-254
- 67 Studer U E, Scherz S, Scheidegger J, Kraft R, Sonntag R, Ackermann D, Zingg E J. Enlargement of regional lymph nodes in renal cell carcinoma is often not due to metastases. J Urol. 1990; 144 243-245
- 68 Sudah M, Vanninen R L, Partanen K. et al . Patients with acute flank pain: comparison of MR urography with unenhanced helica CT. Radiology. 2002; 223 98-105
- 69 Szolar D H, Kammerhuber F, Altziebler S, Tillich M, Breinl E, Fotter R, Schreyer H H. Multiphasic helical CT of the kidney: increased conspicuity for detection and characterization of small (< 3 cm) renal masses. Radiology. 1997; 202 211-217
- 70 Tack D, Sourtzis S, Delpierre I, de Maertelaer V, Gevenois P A. Low-dose unenhanced CT of patients with suspected renal colic. AJR. 2003; 180 305-311
- 71 Thoeny H C, Hoppe H. Native Spiral-CT bei Urolithiasis: Indikation, Durchführung und Interpretation. Fortschr Röntgenstr. 2003; 175 904-910
- 72 Walter C, Kruessell M, Gindele A, Brochhagen H G, Gossmann A, Landwehr P. Imaging of renal lesions: evaluation of fast MRI and helical CT. BJR. 2003; 76 696-703
- 73 Welch T J, LeRoy A J. Helical and electron beam CT scanning in the evaluation of renal vein involvement in patients with renal cell carcinoma. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1997; 21 467-471
- 74 Wittekind C, Meyer H J, Bootz F (Hrsg). TNM Klassifikation maligner Tumoren. 6. Auflage. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York; Springer 2003: 181-189
- 75 Yilmaz S, Sindel T, Arslan G, Özkaynak C, Karaali K, Kabaalioğlu A, Lüleci E. Renal colic: comparison of spiral CT, US and IVU in the detection of ureteral calculi. Eur Radiol. 1998; 8 212-217
Prof. Dr. med. Claus Nolte-Ernsting
Radiologisches Zentrum · Klinik und Poliklinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie · Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
Martinistr. 52 · 20246 Hamburg
Phone: +49(0)40 42803-3810
Fax: +49(0)40 42803-3802
Email: c.nolte-ernsting@uke.uni-hamburg.de