Download PDF
Osteosynthesis and Trauma Care 2003; 11: 81-84
DOI: 10.1055/s-2003-42330
Femur

© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

The Treatment of the Femoral Diaphyseal Fracture with Intramedullary Nailing: A Review of 313 Cases

G. Theodoratos1 , E. Karadimas1 , J. Petroutsas1 , K. Tsabazis1 , A. Papanikolaoy1 , E. Apergis1
  • 1Orthopaedic Department, Red Cross Hospital, Athens, Greece
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
24 September 2003 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to present our experience of interlocking intramedullary nailing in the treatment of femoral fractures and to report the results and the complications.
Material and Method: In a period of nine years (1993-2001) were treated 313 diaphyseal fractures 228 with AIM titanium intramedullary nailing and 85 with Gross-Kempf. All femoral fractures were reamed except the pathological fractures.
The 313 fractures according to AO classification were divided as follows:
Type A 81 (25.9 %), Type B 132 (42.8 %) and Type C 100 (31.3 %). The 89 % of fractures were caused by high energy injuries (traffic accidents). The mean age was 26 yrs (17-78 yrs). From all fractures 256 were closed and 57 were open (grade I: 27, grade II 19, grade III a 11). For type A fractures dynamic intramedullary nailing was the treatment of choice, while in type B, C fractures static intramedullary nailing was performed. In all patients we used prophylactic antibiotics for 48 hours and low weight molecular heparin for a month. The median time of radiation exposure was 16 sec (range 5-42). From the second postoperative day we encourage our patients to walk with partial weight bearing, except those with type C fractures who started their weight bearing after 3 weeks.
EM EMTYPE="BOLD">Results: All type A fractures were united in an average time of 16 weeks, type B in 20 weeks and type C in 23 weeks. In regard to complications, we had: 5 aseptic pseudarthrosis (1.6 %), 12 delayed unions (3.8 %), torsional malunion (5°) in 3 patients (0.96 %). The majority of them were treated with intramedullary nailing revision. In 4 patients (1.28 %) we had limb shortening of 15 mm. (In one case we made dynamic nailing instead of the correct static intramedullary nailing and in 3 cases we failed to centralize the proximal screw. All of them were reoperated.)
Neurological complications were observed postoperatively in 29 patients, 22 with paresis of the pudendal nerve, due to traction (all recovered in a month), and 7 with paresis of peroneal nerve which were recovered in 3 months. There was found 23 broken screws but no broken nail. In one case of pathological fracture (lower 1/3) the guide wire was penetrate in the knee join.
We had two pulmonary and one fat embolism (in patients without chest injury), but none of them was fatal. Also we noticed no superficial or deep infections and we didn't have a case of compartment syndrome. In two patients was observed clinically thrombosis below knee.
Patients returned to their previous activities in a mean time of 12 weeks.
Conclusion: Locking intramedullary nailing offers excellent results in treatment of femoral diaphyseal fractures. We choose AIM titanium nail because the modulus of elasticity is more closer with bone elasticity. Also the fatigue strength, yield strength and ultimate tensile strength, are higher than any other implant. For this reasons we can use smaller diameter nails, with less reaming, and less disturbance of endosteal blood supply.

Key words

Femoral diaphysis - fracture - intramedullary nailing - reaming - complications

References

  • 1 Benirschke S K, Melder I, Henley M B. et al . Closed interlocking nailing of femoral shaft fractures: assessment of technical complications and functional outcomes by comparison of prospective database with retrospective review.  J Orthop Trauma. 1993;  7 118
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Blitzer C M, Hamilton L. Oxygen saturation during reaming and intramedullary nailing of the femur.  Orthopedics. 1992;  15 1403-1405
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Bonnevialle P, Laques D, Fabre G, Mansat P, Rongieres M, Bellumore Y, Mansat M. Femoral shaft fractures in the elderly treated by intramedullary nailing.  Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2002;  88 41-50
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Boulanger B R, Stephen D, Brenneman F D. Thoracic trauma and early intramedullary nailing of femur fractures; are we doing harm?.  J Trauma. 1997;  43 24-28
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Bross P, Reynders P. The unreamed AO femoral intramedullary nail, advantages and disadvantages of a new modular interlocking system. A prospective study of 67 cases.  Acta Orthop Belg. 1998;  64 284-290
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Brumback R J, Ellison T S, Molligan H. et al . Pudendal nerve palsy complicating intramedullary nailing of the femur.  J Bone Joint Surg [Am]. 1992;  74 1450
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Brumback R, Ellison S, Poka A, Bathon G H, Burgess A. Intramedullary nailing of femoral shaft fractures part III. Long-term effects of static interlocking fixation.  J Bone Joint Surg [Am]. 1992;  74 106-111
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Brundage S I, McGhan R, Jurkovich G J, Mack C D, Maier R V. Timing of femur fracture fixation: effect on outcome in patients with thoracic and head injuries.  J Trauma. 2002;  52 299-307
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Chapman M W. The effect of reamed and nonreamed intramedullary nailing on the fracture healing.  Clin Orthop. 1998;  355 (Suppl) 230-238
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Christie J, Court-Brown C, Kinninmouth A, Hovie C. Intramedullary locking nails in the management of femoral shaft fractures.  J Bone Joint Surg [Br]. 1988;  70 206-210
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Claiborne A C. General Principles of Fracture Treatment. In: Canale ST (ed). Campbell's Operative. Orthopaedics Part XII. Mosby, 1998; pp 2141-2142
  • 12 Clawson D K, Smith R F, Hansen S T. Closed intramedullary nailing of the femur.  J Bone Joint Surg [Am]. 1971;  53 681
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Giannoudis P V, Furlong A J, MacDonald D A, Smith R M. Reamed against unreamed nailing of the femoral diaphysis: a retrospective study of healing time.  Injury. 1997;  28 15-18
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Grundnes O, Reikeras O. Closed versus open medullary nailing of femoral fractures. Blood flow and healing studies in rats.  Acta Orthop Scand. 1992;  63 492-496
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Kao J T, Burton D, Cornstock C. et al . Pudendal nerve palsy after femoral intramedullary nailing.  J Orthop Trauma. 1993;  7 58
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Kempf I, Grosse A, Lafforgued L. L’enclouage avec blocage de la rotation on “clou blogue” principles, technique, indications et premiers resultants. Communication a la journee d'hiver, Sofcot 1976
  • 17 Kempf I, Jaefer J H, North J, Crosse A, Paty J, Boyoud A, Schmidt R. L'enclouage centro-medullaire de femur et du tibia selon la technique de Küntscher. Intérêt du verrouillage du clou.  Acta Orth Belgica. 1976;  42 29-43
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Kempf I, Grosse A, Beck G. Closed locked intramedullary nailing. Its application to comminuted fractures of the femur.  J Bone Joint Surg [Am]. 1985;  67 709-720
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Kempf I, Grosse A, Taglang G, Bernhard L, Moui Y. Interlocking central medullary nailing of recent femoral and tibial fractures. Statistical study apropos of 835 cases.  Chirurgie. 1991;  117 478-487
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Kerr P S, Jackson M, Atkins R M. Cardiac arrest during I. n. for femoral metastases.  J Bone Joint Surg. [Am]1993;  75 972-973
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Klemm K W, Borner M. Interlocked nailing of complex fractures of the femur of the tibia.  Clin Orth. 1986;  212 89-100
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Kröpfl A, Naglik H, Primavesi C, Hertz H. Unreamed intramedullary nailing of femoral fractures.  J Trauma. 1995;  38 717
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Küntscher G. Die Marknagelung von Knochenbrüchen. Tierexperimenteller Teil.  Klin Wchnschr. 1940;  19 6
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 Küntscher G. The Küntscher method of intramedullary fixation.  J Bone Joint Surg [Am]. 1958;  40 17
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 25 Lambiris E, Zouboulis P, Karioris G, Anastopoulos G, Asimakopoulos A, Skouteris G, KALOS S, Koulalis G, Andosidis K. Multicenter study for the intramedullary nailing in Greece.  Acta Orthopaedica. Hellenica 1997;  48 128-137
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 26 Pape H C, Regel G, Dwenger A. et al . Influences of different methods of intramedullary femoral nailing on lung function in patients with multiple trauma.  J Trauma. 1993;  35 709
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 27 Rascher J J, Nahigian S H, Macys J R, Brown J E. Closed nailing of femoral-shaft fractures.  J Bone Joint Surg [Am]. 1972;  54 534
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 28 Rhinelander F W. Effects of medullary nailing on the normal blood supply of diaphyseal cortex. The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Vol 22. C.V. Mosby, St. Louis 1973; pp 161-187; Clin Orthop 1998; 350: 5-17
  • 29 Richards R R, Waddell J P, Sullivan T R. et al . Infra-isthmal fractures of the femur: a review of 82 cases.  J Trauma. 1984;  24 735
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 30 Taylor J C. Treatment of distal femoral fractures with the Russell-Taylor nail.  Tech Orthop. 1994;  9 225
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 31 Thorensen B O, Alho A, Ekel A. et al . Interlocking intramedullary nailing in femoral shaft fractures: a report of forty-eight cases.  J Bone Joint Surg [Am]. 1985;  67 1313
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 32 Toolan B C, Koval K J, Kummer F J. et al . Effects of supine positioning and fracture post placement on the perineal countertraction force in awake volunteers.  J Orthop Trauma. 1995;  9 164
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 33 Tornetta P, Tiburzi D. The treatment of femoral shaft fractures using intramedullary interlocking nails with and without intramedullary reaming: a preliminary report.  J Orthop Trauma. 1997;  11 89
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 34 Tornetta P, Tiburzi D. Reamed versus nonreamed anterograde femoral nailing.  J Orthop Trauma. 2000;  14 15-19
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 35 Utvag S E, Reikeras O. Effects of nail rigidity on fractures healing. Strength and mineralisation in rat femoral bone.  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1998;  118 7-13
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 36 Whittaker A PW, Heppenstall B, Menkowitz E, Montique F. Comparison of open vs closed rodding femurs utilizing a Sampson rod.  J Trauma. 1982;  22 461
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 37 Winquist R A, Hansen S T. Comminuted fractures of the femoral shaft treated by intramedullary nailing.  Orthop Clin North Am. 1980;  11 633
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 38 Winquist R A, Hansen S T, Clawson D K. Closed I. N. of femoral fractures.  J Bone Joint Surg. 1984;  529-539
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 39 Wiss D A, Fleming C A, Matta J M, Clark D. Comminuted and rotationally unstable fractures of the femur treated with an interlocking nail.  Clin Orthop. 1986;  212 35
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 40 Wolinsky P R, McCarty E, Shyr Y, Johnson K. Reamed intramedullary nailing of the femur: 551 cases.  J Trauma. 1999;  46 392-399
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 41 Zaki S H, Shamsi S, Butt M S. Femoral fractures in the elderly treatment with an unreamed titanium nail.  Injury. 1998;  29 287-291
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 42 Zettas J P, Zettas P. Ipsilateral fractures of the femoral neck and shaft.  Clin Orthop. 1981;  160 63
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar

G. Theodoratos

9th Solomou str

14561 Athens

Greece

Phone: +30/21 06 41 47 43

Email: dokkar@hotmail.comordokkar@in.gr