Plant Biol (Stuttg) 2003; 5(3): 311-314
DOI: 10.1055/s-2003-40797
Original Paper

Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

“Real” and Feed Pollen of Lagerstroemia indica: Ecophysiological Differences

M. Nepi 1 , M. Guarnieri 1 , E. Pacini 1
  • 1Dipartimento di Scienze Ambientali, Università di Siena, Siena, Italy
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
22 July 2003 (online)

Abstract

Lagerstroemia indica is heterantheric, its flowers bearing two kinds of stamens: six peripheral stamens with long, curved filaments and large anthers producing blue-green pollen, capable of emitting pollen tubes and fertilizing ovules; or a central tuft of 35 - 40 smaller anthers producing yellow feed pollen that does not germinate and is collected by insects, mainly bees. The two types of pollen differ in volume, number of pores, pore intine protrusion, wall structure, pollenkitt quality, hydration state, viability at anthesis, longevity and mono- and disaccharide composition. Although total sugar concentrations (glucose, fructose and sucrose) are the same in both types, relative concentrations are different, “real” pollen being sucrose-rich (S / [G + F] = 1.2) and feed pollen glucose-fructose-rich (S / [G + F] = 0.3). A lower degree of dehydration, pore intine protrusion and higher monosaccharide content could make feed pollen more digestible for pollinators. On the other hand, the cytological features of “real” pollen (high dehydration, higher sucrose content) points to longer viability and reproductive function.

References

  • 1 Baker H. G., Baker I.. Starch in angiosperm pollen grains and its evolutionary significance.  American Journal Botany. (1979);  66 591-600
  • 2 Baker H. G., Baker I.. Floral nectar sugar constituents in relation to pollinator type. Jones, C. E. and Little, R. J., eds. Handbook of Experimental Pollination Biology. New York; Van Nostrand Reinhold (1983)
  • 3 Dafni A.. Mimicry and deception in pollination.  Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics. (1984);  15 259-278
  • 4 Dajoz I., Till-Bottraud I., Gouyon P. H.. Evolution of pollen morphology.  Science. (1991);  253 66-68
  • 5 Dobson H. E. M.. Survey of pollen and pollenkitt lipids, chemical cues for flower visitors?.  American Journal of Botany. (1988);  72 170-182
  • 6 Endress P.. Diversity and Evolutionary Biology of Tropical Flowers. Cambridge; Cambridge University Press (1994)
  • 7 Faegri K., van der Pijl L.. The Principles of Pollination Ecology. Oxford; Pergamon Press (1979)
  • 8 Franchi G. G., Bellani L., Nepi M., Pacini E.. Types of carbohydrate reserves in pollen: localization, systematic distribution and ecophysiological significance.  Flora. (1996);  191 133-159
  • 9 Franchi G. G., Nepi M., Pacini E.. Partially hydrated pollen: taxonomic distribution, ecological and evolutionary significance.  Plant Systematics and Evolution. (2002);  234 211-227
  • 10 Heslop-Harrison J., Heslop-Harrison Y.. Evaluation of pollen viability by enzymatically induced fluorescence, intracellular hydrolysis of fluorescein diacetate.  Stain Technology. (1970);  45 115-120
  • 11 Hoekstra F. A., Van Roekel T.. Desiccation tolerance of Papaver dubium L. pollen during its development in the anther; possible role of phospholipid composition and sucrose content.  Plant Physiology. (1988);  88 626-632
  • 12 Hoekstra F. A., Golovina E. A., Buitink J.. Mechanisms of plant desiccation tolerance.  Trends in Plants Sciences. (2001);  6 431-438
  • 13 Johansen D. A.. Plant Microtechniques. New York; McGraw-Hill (1940)
  • 14 Nepi M., Pacini E.. Pollination, pollen viability and pistil receptivity in Cucurbita pepo. .  Annals of Botany. (1993);  72 527-536
  • 15 Nepi M., Pacini E., Pinzauti M.. Preliminary studies on pollen digestibility by Osmia cornuta Latr. (Hymenoptra Megachilidae).  Acta Horticulture. (1997);  437 435-439
  • 16 Nepi M., Franchi G. G., Pacini E.. Pollen hydration status at dispersal: cytophysiological features and strategies.  Protoplasma. (2001);  216 171-180
  • 17 Pacini E.. Harmomegathy characters of pteridophyta spores and spermatophyta pollen.  Plant Systematics Evolution. (1990);  (Suppl 5) 1-12
  • 18 Pacini E.. Cell biology of anther and pollen development. Williams, E. G., Clarke, A. E., and Knox, R. B., eds. Control of Self-Incompatibility and Reproductive Development in Flowering Plants. Dordrecht; Kluwer Academic Publishers (1994): 289-308
  • 19 Pacini E.. Tapetum character states: analytical keys for tapetum types and activities.  Canadian Journal of Botany. (1997 a);  75 1348-1359
  • 20 Pacini E.. Types and meaning of pollen carbohydrate reserves.  Sexual Plant Reproduction. (1997 b);  9 362-366
  • 21 Pacini E.. From anther and pollen ripening to pollen presentation.  Plant Systematics and Evolution. (2000);  122 19-43
  • 22 Pacini E., Bellani L.. Lagerstroemia indica L. pollen: form and function. Blackmore, S. and Ferguson, I. K., eds. Pollen and Spores: Form and Function. London; Academic Press (1986): 344-347
  • 23 Pacini E., Hesse M.. Types of pollen dispersal units in orchids, and their consequences for germination and fertilization.  Annals of Botany. (2002);  89 653-664
  • 24 Pacini E., Franchi G. G., Lisci M., Nepi M.. Pollen viability related to type of pollination in six angiosperm species.  Annals of Botany. (1997);  80 83-87
  • 25 Speranza A., Calzoni G. L., Pacini E.. Occurrence of mono- or disaccharides and polysaccharide reserves in mature pollen grains.  Sexual Plant Reproduction. (1997);  10 110-115
  • 26 Stanley R. G., Linskens H. F.. Pollen: Biology, Biochemistry and Management. Berlin; Springer Verlag (1974)
  • 27 Vorobyev M., Gumbert A., Kunze J., Giurfa M., Menzel R.. Flowers through insect eyes.  Israel Journal of Plant Science. (1997);  45 93-101
  • 28 Wolkers W. F., Hoekstra F. A.. Aging of dry desiccation tolerant pollen does not affect protein secondary structure.  Plant Physiology. (1995);  109 907-915

E. Pacini

Dipartimento di Scienze Ambientali
Università di Siena

via P. A. Mattioli 4

53100 Siena

Italy

Email: pacini@unisi.it

Section Editor: G. Gottsberger