Download PDF
Seminars in Neurosurgery 2000; 11(2): 183-192
DOI: 10.1055/s-2000-13225
Copyright © 2000 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA. Tel.: +1(212) 584-4662

CURRENT ROLE OF PEDICLE SCREWS IN THE LUMBAR SPINE

Nevan G. Baldwin, David G. Malone
  • University of New Mexico, Division of Neurosurgery, Albuquerque, New Mexico, and Neurosurgery, Inc., Tulsa, Oklahoma.
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
31 December 2000 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

The development of pedicle screw instrumentation systems has revolutionized spine surgery. From a biomechanical perspective, pedicle screws provide the greatest degree of spinal stabilization among all spinal implants. Pedicle screws, attached to rods linked by crossmembers, provide rigid control of vertebral body motion in all three spatial dimensions. This characteristic provides substantial advantages to the spinal surgeon for treatment of numerous disorders. Pedicle screws offer distinct advantages in the treatment of tumors, trauma, and deformity of the lumbar spine. They can be applied in nearly any situation involving instability of the lumbar spine.

KEYWORD

Complications - indications - pedicle screws - spinal instrumentation

REFERENCES

  • 1 Johnston C E, Welch R D, Baker K J, Ashman R B. Effect of spinal construct stiffness on short segment fusion mass incorporation.  Spine . 1995;  20(22) 2400-2407
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Kostuik J P, Munting E, Valdevit A. Biomechanical anslysis of screw load sharing in pedicle fixation of the lumbar spine.  J Spinal Disord . 1994;  7(5) 394-401
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Wetzel F T, Brustein M, Phillips F M, Trott S. Hardware failure in an unconstrained lumbar pedicle screw system. A 2-year follow-up study.  Spine . 1999;  24(11) 1138-1143
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Zdeblick T A. A prospective, randomized study of lumbar fusion. Preliminary results [see comments].  Spine . 1993;  18(8) 983-991
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Krag M H, Weaver D L, Beynnon B D, Haugh L D. Morphometry of the thoracic and lumbar spine related to transpedicular screw placement for surgical spinal fixation.  Spine . 1988;  13(1) 27-32
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Soshi S, Shiba R, Kondo H, Murota K. An experimental study on transpedicular screw fixation in relation to osteoporosis of the lumbar spine.  Spine . 1991;  16(11) 1335-1341
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Zindrick M R, Wiltse L L, Widell E H. A biomechanical study of intrapeduncular screw fixation in the lumbosacral spine.  Clin Orthop . 1986;  (203) 99-112
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Hasegawa K, Takahashi H E, Uchiyama S. An experimental study of a combination method using a pedicle screw and laminar hook for the osteoporotic spine [see comments].  Spine . 1997;  22(9) 958-962
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Stovall Jr O D, Goodrich J A, Lundy D, Standard S C, Joe C, Preston C D. Sacral fixation technique in lumbosacral fusion.  Spine . 1997;  22(1) 32-37
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Leong J C, Lu W W, Zheng Y, Zhu Q, Zhong S. Comparison of the strengths of lumbosacral fixation achieved with techniques using one and two triangulated sacral screws.  Spine . 1998;  23(21) 2289-2294
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Dick J C, Jones M P, Zdeblick T A, Kunz D N, Horton W C. A biomechanical comparison evaluating the use of intermediate screws and cross-linkage in lumbar pedicle fixation.  J Spinal Disord . 1994;  7(5) 402-407
    Google Scholar
  • 12 Lim T H, Eck J C, An H S, Hong J H, Ahn J Y, You J W. Biomechanics of transfixation in pedicle screw instrumentation.  Spine . 1996;  21(19) 2224-2229
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Barber J W, Boden S D, Ganey T, Hutton W C. Biomechanical study of lumbar pedicle screws: does convergence affect axial pullout strength?.  J Spinal Disord . 1998;  11(3) 215-220
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Krag M H, Beynnon B D, Pope M H, Frymoyer J W, Haugh L D, Weaver D L. An internal fixator for posterior application to short segments of the thoracic, lumbar, or lumbosacral spine. Design and testing.  Clin Orthop . 1986;  (203) 75-98
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Mann K A, McGowan D P, Fredrickson B E, Falahee M, Yuan H A. A biomechanical investigation of short segment spinal fixation for burst fractures with varying degrees of posterior disruption.  Spine . 1990;  15(6) 470-478
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Mick C A, Carl A, Sachs B, Hresko M T, Pfeifer B A. Burst fractures of the fifth lumbar vertebra.  Spine . 1993;  18(13) 1878-1884
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Sasso R C, Cotler H B. Posterior instrumentation and fusion for unstable fractures and fracture-dislocations of the thoracic and lumbar spine. A comparative study of three fixation devices in 70 patients.  Spine . 1993;  18(4) 450-46041
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 McCormack T, Karaikovic E, Gaines R W. The load sharing classification of spine fractures.  Spine . 1994;  19(15) 1741-1744
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Yoganandan N, Larson S J, Pintar F, Maiman D J, Reinartz J, Sances Jr A. Biomechanics of lumbar pedicle screw/plate fixation in trauma.  Neurosurgery . 1990;  27(6) 873-880
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Marchesi D G, Aebi M. Pedicle fixation devices in the treatment of adult lumbar scoliosis.  Spine . 1992;  17(8 suppl) S304-S309
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Booth K C, Bridwell K H, Eisenberg B A, Baldus C R, Lenke L G. Minimum 5-year results of degenerative spondylolisthesis treated with decompression and instrumented posterior fusion.  Spine . 1999;  24(16) 1721-1727
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Deguchi M, Rapoff A J, Zdeblick T A. Posterolateral fusion for isthmic spondylolisthesis in adults: analysis of fusion rate and clinical results.  J Spinal Disord . 1998;  11(6) 459-464
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Fischgrund J S, Mackay M, Herkowitz H N, Brower R, Montgomery D M, Kurz L T. 1997 Volvo Award winner in clinical studies. Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis: a prospective, randomized study comparing decompressive laminectomy and arthrodesis with and without spinal instrumentation.  Spine . 1997;  22(24) 2807-2812
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Niu C C, Chen W J, Chen L H, Shih C H. Reduction-fixation spinal system in spondylolisthesis.  Am J Orthop . 1996;  25(6) 418-424
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Rechtine G R, Sutterlin C E, Wood G W, Boyd R J, Mansfield F L. The efficacy of pedicle screw/plate fixation on lumbar/lumbosacral autogenous bone graft fusion in adult patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis.  J Spinal Disord . 1996;  9(5) 382-391
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Ricciardi J E, Pflueger P C, Isaza J E, Whitecloud III S T. Transpedicular fixation for the treatment of isthmic spondylolisthesis in adults.  Spine . 1995;  20(17) 1917-1922
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Schnee C L, Freese A, Ansell L V. Outcome analysis for adults with spondylolisthesis treated with posterolateral fusion and transpedicular screw fixation.  J Neurosurg . 1997;  86(1) 56-63
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Soini J, Laine T, Pohjolainen T, Hurri H, Alaranta H. Spondylodesis augmented by transpedicular fixationi n the treatment of olisthetic and degenerative conditions of the lumbar spine.  Clin Orthop . 1993;  (297) 111-116
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Suk S I, Lee C K, Kim W J, Lee J H, Cho K J, Kim H G. Adding posterior lumbar interbody fusion to pedicle screw fixation and posterolateral fusion after decompression in spondylolytic spondylolisthesis.  Spine . 1997;  22(2) 210-219
    Google Scholar
  • 30 Gillet P, Petit M. Direct repair of spondylolysis without spondylolisthesis, using a rod-screw construct and bone grafting of the pars defect.  Spine . 1999;  24(12) 1252-1256
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Kakiuchi M. Repair of the defect in spondylolysis. Durable fixation with pedicle screws and laminar hooks.  J Bone Joint Surg Am . 1997;  79(6) 818-7825
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Salib R M, Pettine K A. Modified repair of a defect in spondylolysis or minimal spondylolisthesis by pedicle screw, segmental wire fixation, and bone grafting.  Spine . 1993;  18(4) 440-443
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Oda I, Cunningham B W, Abumi K, Kaneda K, McAfee P C. The stability of reconstruction methods after thoracolumbar total spondylectomy. An in vitro investigation.  Spine . 1999;  24(16) 1634-1638
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Wimmer C, Krismer M, Gluch H, Ogon M, Stockl B. Autogenic versus allogenic bone grafts in anterior lumbar interbody fusion.  Clin Orthop . 1999;  (360) 122-126
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Benzel E C, Baldwin N G. Crossed-screw fixation of the unstable thoracic and lumbar spine.  J Neurosurg . 1995;  82(1) 11-16
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Masferrer R, Gomez C H, Karahalios D G, Sonntag V K. Efficacy of pedicle screw fixation in the treatment of spinal instability and failed back surgery: a 5-year review.  J Neurosurg . 1998;  89(3) 371-377
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Esses S I, Sachs B L, Dreyzin V. Complications associated with the technique of pedicle screw fixation. A selected survey of ABS members.  Spine . 1993;  18(15) 2231-2238
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Faraj A A, Webb J K. Early complications of spinal pedicle screw.  Eur Spine J . 1997;  6(5) 324-326
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Okuyama K, Abe E, Suzuki T, Tamura Y, Chiba M, Sato K. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion: a retrospective study of complications after facet joint excision and pedicle screw fixation in 148 cases.  Acta Orthop Scand . 1999;  70(4) 329-334
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Young W F, Morledge D E, Martin W, Park K B. Intraoperative stimulation of pedicle screws: a new method for verification of screw placement.  Surg Neurol . 1995;  44(6) 544-547
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Benzel E C, Rupp F W, McCormack B M, Baldwin N G, Anson J A, Adams M S. A comparison of fluoroscopy and computed tomography-derived volumetric multiple exposure transmission holography for the guidance of lumbar pedicle screw insertion.  Neurosurgery . 1995;  37(4) 711-716
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Kalfas I H, Kormos D W, Murphy M A. Application of frameless stereotaxy to pedicle screw fixation of the spine.  J Neurosurg . 1995;  83(4) 641-647
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Kamimura M, Ebara S, Itoh H, Tateiwa Y, Kinoshita T, Takaoka K. Accurate pedicle screw insertion under the control of a computer-assisted image guiding system: laboratory test and clinical study.  J Orthop Sci . 1999;  4(3) 197-206
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Merloz P, Tonetti J, Eid A. Computer assisted spine surgery.  Clin Orthop . 1997;  (337) 86-96
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Nolte L, Zamorano L, Arm E. Image-guided computer-assisted spine surgery: a pilot study on pedicle screw fixation.  Stereotact Funct Neurosurg . 1996;  66(1-3) 108-117
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Girardi F P, Cammisa Jr P F, Sandhu H S, Alvarez L. The placement of lumbar pedicle screws using computerised stereotactic guidance.  J Bone Joint Surg Br . 1999;  81(5) 825-829
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Merloz P, Tonetti J, Pittet L, Coulomb M, Lavallee S, Sautot P. Pedicle screw placement using image guided techniques.  Clin Orthop . 1998;  (354) 39-48
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Schulze C J, Munzinger E, Weber U. Clinical relevance of accuracy of pedicle screw placement. A computed tomographic-supported analysis.  Spine . 1998;  23(20) 2215-2220
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 McLain R F, Kabins M, Weinstein J N. VSP stabilization of lumbar neoplasms: technical considerations and complications.  J Spinal Disord . 1991;  4(3) 359-365
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Devlin V J, Boachie-Adjei O, Bradford D S, Ogilvie J W, Transfeldt E E. Treatment of adult spinal deformity with fusion to the sacrum using CD instrumentation.  J Spinal Disord . 1991;  4(1) 1-14
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Lonstein J E, Denis F, Perra J H, Pinto M R, Smith M D, Winter R B. Complications associated with pedicle screws.  J Bone Joint Surg Am . 1999;  81(11) 1519-15281
    PubMedGoogle Scholar