CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Laryngorhinootologie 2022; 101(S 02): S243-S244
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1746799
Poster
Otology / Neurootology / Audiology: Cochlear implant

The influence of face masks on speech intelligibility of cochlear implant users

Rasmus Sönnichsen
1   Evangelisches Krankenhaus Oldenburg, Universitätsklinik für Hals-Nasen-Ohren-Heilkunde Oldenburg
,
Gerard Llorach Tó
2   Universität Oldenburg, Auditorische Signalverarbeitung Oldenburg
,
Sabine Hochmuth
1   Evangelisches Krankenhaus Oldenburg, Universitätsklinik für Hals-Nasen-Ohren-Heilkunde Oldenburg
,
Volker Hohmann
2   Universität Oldenburg, Auditorische Signalverarbeitung Oldenburg
,
Andreas Radeloff
1   Evangelisches Krankenhaus Oldenburg, Universitätsklinik für Hals-Nasen-Ohren-Heilkunde Oldenburg
› Author Affiliations
 

Hearing impaired listeners heavily rely on facial expressions and unfiltered speech signals for a sufficient speech understanding. Due to the current Covid-19 pandemic face masks are worn by almost everyone every day. They therefore interfere especially with the communication of hearing impaired listeners.

We used a modified audiovisual German matrix sentence test (AV-OLSA)<sup>1 </sup>to further evaluate the effect of face masks on speech intelligibility in a cohort of cochlear implant users (CI, n=15) and a control group of normal hearing listeners (NH, n=5). Besides “audio-only”, “visual-only” and “audiovisual” conditions, we added modified conditions. These consisted of an audiovisual condition with a simulated mask and an audio signal, which was edited according to the acoustic filter properties of different face masks (surgical and FFP-2).

Our preliminary data show a gain of 5.3 dB (CI) and 2.6 dB (NH) in speech reception thresholds at 80% word recognition (SRT80%) respectively, if a speaker’s video is added to an unfiltered audio signal.

Different types of face masks (surgical and FFP-2) led to a deterioration in SRT80% in both groups of up to 7.6 dB (CI) and 4.2 dB (NH) when compared to an unfiltered audiovisual condition without a face mask. The acoustic filter properties of the face masks accounted for up to 2.2 dB (CI) and 1.5 dB (NH) of the deterioration in SRT80%. This effect was therefore less distinct compared to the effect of a missing video signal.

Face masks complicate the daily communication. These effects are already detectable in a cohort of normal hearing listeners<sup>2</sup > and even more pronounced in hearing impaired listeners, e.g. cochlear implant users.

1) Llorach G et al., Int J Audiol  , 2021.

2) Sönnichsen R et al., Otol Neurotol, accepted for publication.



Publication History

Article published online:
24 May 2022

© 2022. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Georg Thieme Verlag
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart,Germany