CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Eur J Dent 2012; 06(04): 434-439
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1698984
Original Article
Dental Investigation Society

Antibacterial activity of calcium hydroxide and chlorhexidine containing points against Fusobacterium nucleatum and Parvimonas micra

Andreas Rathke
1   Department of Operative Dentistry and Periodontology, University of Ulm, GERMANY
,
Dominik Meisohle
2   Division of Oral Microbiology, Department of Operative Dentistry and Periodontology, University of Ulm, GERMANY
,
Jens Bokelmann
3   Dentist in Private Practice, Kirchheim unter Teck, GERMANY
,
Bernd Haller
1   Department of Operative Dentistry and Periodontology, University of Ulm, GERMANY
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
30 September 2019 (online)

ABSTRACT

Objective: Up to 90% of the flora of an infected root canal consists of obligate anaerobic bacteria. However, most studies have centred on microaerophiles. This quantitative assay investigated the antibacterial effects against Fusobacterium nucleatum and Parvimonas micra of gutta-percha (GP) points containing either calcium hydroxide (Ca(OH)2) or chlorhexidine (CHX) compared to those of conventional GP points.

Methods: Standardized root canals were prepared in 192 bovine incisors. The canals were sterilized and then inoculated with one of two bacterial species (n=96 teeth per bacterium). After anaerobic incubation at 37ºC, the inoculum was removed and the canals were filled with one of the three points. Control teeth were filled with a saline/serum mixture. After 0, 1, 4 and 8 days of anaerobic incubation, the numbers of viable bacteria (CFU/ml) were determined on both the points and the canal wall dentin. Six replicates were carried out for each experiment.

Results: None of the points completely eradicated the bacteria in the canal. GP+CHX was significantly more effective than GP+Ca(OH)2 and GP (P<.05 in each case). The inhibitory effect of GP+Ca(OH)2 did not significantly differ from that of GP (P>.05). Compared to the controls, the antibacterial effect of the medicated points was reached initially.

Conclusion: Within the limitations of the in vitro model, the incorporation of commonly used medicaments in GP does not offer a long-lasting antibacterial advantage over non-medicated GP. (Eur J Dent 2012;6:434-439)

 
  • References

  • 1 Gomes BP, Pinheiro ET, Gade-Neto C et al. Microbiological examination of infected dental root canals. Oral Microbiol Immunol 2004;19:71-76.
  • 2 Blome B, Braun A, Sobarzo V, Jepsen S. Molecular identification and quantification of bacteria from endodontic infections using real-time polyermase chain reaction. Oral Microbiol Immunol 2008;23:384-390.
  • 3 Sathorn C, Parashos P, Messer H. Antibacterial efficacy of calcium hydroxide intracanal dressing: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Endod J 2007;40:2-10.
  • 4 Mohammadi Z, Abbott PV. Antimicrobial substantivity of root canal irrigants and medicament: a review. Aust Endod J 2009;35:131-139.
  • 5 Podbielski A, Spahr A, Haller B. Additive antimicrobial activity of calcium hydroxide and chlorhexidine on common endodontic bacterial pathogens. J Endod 2003;29:340-345.
  • 6 Yesilsoy C, Whitaker E, Cleveland D, Phillips E, Trope M. Antimicrobial and toxic effects of established and potential root canal irrigants. J Endod 1995;21:513-515.
  • 7 Staehle HJ, Thomä C, Müller HP. Comparative in vitro investigation of different methods for temporary root canal filling with aqueous suspensions of calcium hydroxide. Endod Dent Traumatol 1997;13:106-112.
  • 8 Ebert J, Roggendorf MJ, Frank K, Petschelt A. Antimicrobial activity of various 'active' gutta-percha points against Enterococcus faecalis in simulated root canals. Int Endod J 2008;41:249-257.
  • 9 Portenier I, Waltimo T, Ørstavik D, Haapasalo M. Killing of Enterococcus faecalis by MTAD and chlorhexidine digluconate with or without cetrimide in the presence or absence of dentine powder or BSA. J Endod 2006;32:138-141.
  • 10 Zehnder M, Luder H, Schatzle M, Kerosuo E, Waltimo T. A comparative study on the disinfection potentials of bioactive glass S53P4 and calcium hydroxide in contra-lateral human premolars ex vivo. Int Endod J 2006;39:952-958.
  • 11 Haapasalo M, Ørstavik D. In vitro infection and disinfection of dentinal tubules. J Dent Res 1987;66:1375-1379.
  • 12 Schäfer E, Bössmann K. Antimicrobial efficacy of chlorhexidine and two calcium hydroxide formulations against Enterococcus faecalis. J Endod 2005;31:53-56.
  • 13 Lui JN, Sae-Lim V, Song KP, Chen NN. In vitro antimicrobial effect of chlorhexidine-impregnated gutta percha points on Enterococcus faecalis. Int Endod J 2004;37:105-113.
  • 14 Sundqvist G. Taxonomy, ecology, and pathogenicity of the root canal flora. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1994;78:522-530.
  • 15 Seabra Pereira OL, Siqueira JF Jr. Contamination of guttapercha and Resilon cones taken directly from the manufacturer. Clin Oral Investig 2010;14:327-330.
  • 16 Rathke A, Staude R, Muche R, Haller B. Antibacterial activity of a triclosan-containing resin composite matrix against three common oral bacteria. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2010;21:2971-2977.
  • 17 Spahr A, Lyngstadaas SP, Boeckh C, Andersson C, Podbielski A, Haller B. Effect of enamel matrix derivate Emdogain on the growth of periodontal pathogens in vitro. J Clin Periodontol 2002;29:62-72.
  • 18 Barthel CR, Zimmer S, Zilliges S, Schiller R, Göbel UB, Roulet JF. In situ antimicrobial effectiveness of chlorhexidine and calcium hydroxide: gel and paste versus guttapercha points. J Endod 2002;28:427-430.
  • 19 Economides N, Koulaouzidou EA, Beltes P, Kortsaris AH. In vitro release of hydroxyl ions from calcium hydroxide guttapercha points. J Endod 1999;25:481-482.
  • 20 Schäfer E, Al Behaissi A. ph changes in root dentin after root canal dressing with gutta-percha points containing calcium hydroxide. J Endod 2000;26:665-667.
  • 21 Silver S. Bacterial resistance to toxic metal ions - a review. Gene 1996;179:9-19.