The Use of a Game-Based Decision Aid to Educate Pregnant Women about Prenatal Screening: A Randomized Controlled Study

Abstract

Purpose This project developed and evaluated the efficacy of a game decision aid among pregnant women about prenatal screening in a randomized controlled study.

Study Design Participants were recruited from an obstetric clinic of an academic urban medical center and randomized (n = 73) to one of two study groups: the control group (n = 39) that used a brochure or the intervention group (n = 34) that also used a game decision aid.

Result Participants who played the game had higher knowledge scores (m = 21.41, standard deviation [SD] = 1.74) than participants in the control group (m = 19.59; SD = 3.31), p = 0.004. The median time of game playing was 6:43 minutes (range: 2:17–16:44). The groups were similar in frequency of completing screening after the study, control = 6 (15%) versus intervention = 11 (32%), p = 0.087. However, the more interaction with the game resulted in more positive attitudes toward screening.

Conclusion The addition of a game decision aid was effective in educating pregnant women about prenatal screening. As other genetic testing decisions continue to increase within clinical care, game-based decision tools may be a constructive method of informed decision-making.

Keywords

prenatal screening - decision aid - games - randomized controlled study - education

• References

• 1 Committee on Practice Bulletins—Obstetrics, Committee on Genetics, and the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine. Practice Bulletin No. 163: Screening for Fetal Aneuploidy. Obstet Gynecol 2016; 127 (05) e123-e137
• 2 Gammon BL, Kraft SA, Michie M, Allyse M. “I think we've got too many tests!”: prenatal providers' reflections on ethical and clinical challenges in the practice integration of cell-free DNA screening. Ethics Med Public Health 2016; 2 (03) 334-342
• 3 Kuppermann M, Pena S, Bishop JT. , et al. Effect of enhanced information, values clarification, and removal of financial barriers on use of prenatal genetic testing: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2014; 312 (12) 1210-1217
• 4 Dyer J, Latendresse G, Cole E, Coleman J, Rothwell E. Content of first prenatal visits. Matern Child Health J 2018; 22 (05) 679-684
• 5 Kuppermann M, Norton ME, Gates E. , et al. Computerized prenatal genetic testing decision-assisting tool: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 113 (01) 53-63
• 6 Leung CM, Ho GKH, Foong M, Ho CF, Lee PKK, Mak LSP. Small-group hypertension health education programme: a process and outcome evaluation. J Adv Nurs 2005; 52 (06) 631-639
• 7 Stacey D, Bennett CL, Barry MJ. , et al. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011; (10) CD001431
• 8 Brown SJ, Lieberman DA, Germeny BA, Fan YC, Wilson DM, Pasta DJ. Educational video game for juvenile diabetes: results of a controlled trial. Med Inform (Lond) 1997; 22 (01) 77-89
• 9 Zagal JP. . Ethical reasoning and reflection as supported by single-player videogames. In: Gibson D, Schrier K. , eds. Designing Games for Ethics: Models, Techniques, and Frameworks: Information Science Reference. Hershey, PA: IGI Global; 2011: 19-35
• 10 Sicart M. The Ethics of Computer Games. Boston, MA: MIT; 2009
• 11 Cannon-Bowers JA, Bowers C, Procci K. . Using video games as educational tools in healthcare. In: Tobias S, Fletcher JD. , eds. Computer Games and Instruction. Charlotte, NC: Information Age; 2011: 42-72
• 12 Arnab S. Serious Games for Healthcare: Applications and Implications. Hershey, PA: IGI Global; 2012
• 13 Susi T, Johannesson M, Backlund P. Serious Games: An Overview. Developing Industrial Strategies through Innovative Cluster and Technologies. Technical Report HS- IKI -TR-07–001. 2007
• 14 Volk RJ, Llewellyn-Thomas H, Stacey D, Elwyn G. Ten years of the International Patient Decision Aid Standards Collaboration: evolution of the core dimensions for assessing the quality of patient decision aids. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2013; 13 (2, Suppl 2): S1
• 15 Entertainment Software Association. Essential Facts about the Computer and Video Game Industry 2016 Sales, Demographic, and Usage Data. ESA Annual Report. Available at: http://www.theesa.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/EF2017_FinalDigital.pdf
• 16 Hunter AG, Cappelli M, Humphreys L. , et al. A randomized trial comparing alternative approaches to prenatal diagnosis counseling in advanced maternal age patients. Clin Genet 2005; 67 (04) 303-313
• 17 Seavilleklein V. Challenging the rhetoric of choice in prenatal screening. Bioethics 2009; 23 (01) 68-77
• 18 Paul D. The Politics of Heredity: Essays on Eugenics, Biomedicine, and the Nature-Nurture Debate. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press; 1998
• 19 Song K, Musci TJ, Caughey AB. Clinical utility and cost of non-invasive prenatal testing with cfDNA analysis in high-risk women based on a US population. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2013; 26 (12) 1180-1185
• 20 Dyer J, Latendresse G, Cole E, Coleman J, Rothwell E. Content of first prenatal visits. Matern Child Health J 2018; 22 (05) 679-684