CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Revista Urología Colombiana / Colombian Urology Journal 2018; 27(03): 214-222
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1656557
Review Article | Artículo de Revisión
Sociedad Colombiana de Urología. Publicado por Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Pene No Conspicuo (Oculto)

Inconspicuous Penis
Nicolás Fernández
1   Division de Urologia, Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá, Colombia
2   Division de Urologia Pediatrica, Fundacion Santa Fe de Bogota, Bogotá, Colombia
3   Division of Urology, Hospital for SickKids. University of Toronto, Canada
,
Angie Katherine Puerto Niño
1   Division de Urologia, Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá, Colombia
,
Juan David Iregui Parra
4   Departamento de Urología Clínica DESA, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá, Colombia
,
Jaime Francisco Pérez Niño
1   Division de Urologia, Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá, Colombia
2   Division de Urologia Pediatrica, Fundacion Santa Fe de Bogota, Bogotá, Colombia
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

07. März 2016

08. Februar 2018

Publikationsdatum:
15. Oktober 2018 (online)

Resumen

El término pene no conspicuo (oculto), agrupa las patologías en las que el pene adopta un tamaño aparentemente más pequeño, ya sea porque se oculta bajo el tejido cicatricial en caso del pene atrapado, cuando presenta un pliegue de piel que reduce el ángulo penoescrotal tratándose del pene en vela, o en los casos en los que el pene es cubierto por prepucio redundante produciendo un pene enterrado. Se realiza una revisión de la definición y terminología utilizada a través de la historia, clasificación actual, etiología, diagnóstico y técnica quirúrgica empleada para la corrección del pene no conspicuo (oculto).

Abstract

Inconspicuous penis is referred conditions where the penis looks apparently small but is truely hidden under scarring tissue or under redundant mucosa or prepubic fat. These are all different pathologies that are surgically treated. Multiple techniques have been described. The aim of the present article is to review the state of the art in management throughout history, current classification, etiology, diagnosis and surgical techniques for correcting this pathology.

 
  • Referencias

  • 1 Keyes E. Phimosis-paraphimosis-tumours of the penis. Urol D Applet Co. 1919; 67: 649
  • 2 Maizels M, Zaontz M, Donovan J, Bushnick PN, Firlit CF. Surgical correction of the buried penis: description of a classification system and a technique to correct the disorder. J Urol 1986; 136 (1 Pt 2): 268-271
  • 3 Bergeson PS, Hopkin RJ, Bailey Jr RB, McGill LC, Piatt JP. The inconspicuous penis. Pediatrics 1993; 92 (06) 794-799
  • 4 O'Brien A, Shapiro AM, Frank JD. Phimosis or congenital megaprepuce?. Br J Urol 1994; 73 (06) 719-720
  • 5 Alexander A, Lorenzo AJ, Salle JLP, Rode H. The Ventral V-plasty: a simple procedure for the reconstruction of a congenital megaprepuce. J Pediatr Surg 2010; 45 (08) 1741-1747
  • 6 Radhakrishnan J, Reyes HM. Penoplasty for buried penis secondary to “radical” circumcision. J Pediatr Surg 1984; 19 (06) 629-631
  • 7 Williams CP, Richardson BG, Bukowski TP. Importance of identifying the inconspicuous penis: prevention of circumcision complications. Urology 2000; 56 (01) 140-142 , discussion 142–143
  • 8 Lipszyc E, Pfister C, Liard A, Mitrofanoff P. Surgical treatment of buried penis. Eur J Pediatr Surg 1997; 7 (05) 292-295
  • 9 Palmer JS, Elder JS, Palmer LS. The use of betamethasone to manage the trapped penis following neonatal circumcision. J Urol 2005; 174 (4 Pt 2): 1577-1578
  • 10 Borsellino A, Spagnoli A, Vallasciani S, Martini L, Ferro F. Surgical approach to concealed penis: technical refinements and outcome. Urology 2007; 69 (06) 1195-1198
  • 11 Ferro F, Spagnoli A, Villa M, Papendieck CM. A salvage surgical solution for recurrent lymphangioma of the prepuce. Br J Plast Surg 2005; 58 (01) 97-99
  • 12 Lim DJ, Barraza MA, Stevens PS. Correction of retractile concealed penis. J Urol 1995; 153 (05) 1668-1670
  • 13 Glanz S. Adult congenital penile deformity. Case report. Plast Reconstr Surg 1968; 41 (06) 579-580
  • 14 Perlmutter AD, Chamberlain JW. Webbed penis without chordee. J Urol 1972; 107 (02) 320-321
  • 15 Dilley AV, Currie BG. Webbed penis. Pediatr Surg Int 1999; 15 (5-6): 447-448
  • 16 Shapiro SR. Surgical treatment of the “buried” penis. Urology 1987; 30 (06) 554-559
  • 17 El-Koutby M, Mohamed Amin G. Webbed penis: A new classification. J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg 2010; 15 (02) 50-52
  • 18 Redman JF. A technique for the correction of penoscrotal fusion. J Urol 1985; 133 (03) 432-433
  • 19 Bonitz RP, Hanna MK. Correction of congenital penoscrotal webbing in children: A retrospective review of three surgical techniques. J Pediatr Urol 2016; 12 (03) 161.e1-161.e5
  • 20 Cromie WJ, Ritchey ML, Smith RC, Zagaja GP. Anatomical alignment for the correction of buried penis. J Urol 1998; 160 (04) 1482-1484
  • 21 Liu X, He DW, Hua Y, Zhang DY, Wei GH. Congenital completely buried penis in boys: anatomical basis and surgical technique. BJU Int 2013; 112 (02) 271-275
  • 22 Boemers TML, De Jong TPVM. The surgical correction of buried penis: a new technique. J Urol 1995; 154 (2 Pt 1): 550-552
  • 23 Wollin M, Duffy PG, Malone PS, Ransley PG. Buried penis. A novel approach. Br J Urol 1990; 65 (01) 97-100
  • 24 Alter GJ, Ehrlich RM. A new technique for correction of the hidden penis in children and adults. J Urol 1999; 161 (02) 455-459
  • 25 Shenoy MU, Srinivasan J, Sully L, Rance CH. Buried penis: surgical correction using liposuction and realignment of skin. BJU Int 2000; 86 (04) 527-530
  • 26 Redman JF. Buried penis: congenital syndrome of a short penile shaft and a paucity of penile shaft skin. J Urol 2005; 173 (05) 1714-1717 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022534705607033 [Internet]
  • 27 Spinoit AF, Van Praet C, Groen LA, Van Laecke E, Praet M, Hoebeke P. Congenital penile pathology is associated with abnormal development of the dartos muscle: a prospective study of primary penile surgery at a tertiary referral center. J Urol 2015; 193 (05) 1620-1624
  • 28 Delgado Oliva FJ, Domínguez Hinarejos C, Serrano Durbá S, Estornell Moragues F, Martínez Verduch M, García Ibarra F. Megaprepucio congénito: diagnóstico y manejo terapéutico. Actas Urol Esp 2006; 30 (10) 1038-1042
  • 29 Ferro F, Spagnoli A, Spyridakis I, Atzori P, Martini L, Borsellino A. Surgical approach to the congenital megaprepuce. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2006; 59 (12) 1453-1457
  • 30 Brisson P, Patel H, Chan M, Feins N. Penoplasty for buried penis in children: report of 50 cases. J Pediatr Surg 2001; 36 (03) 421-425
  • 31 Metcalfe PD, Rink RC. The concealed penis: management and outcomes. Curr Opin Urol 2005; 15 (04) 268-272
  • 32 Radhakrishnan J, Razzaq A, Manickam K. Concealed penis. Pediatr Surg Int 2002; 18 (08) 668-672
  • 33 Casale AJ, Beck SD, Cain MP, Adams MC, Rink RC. Concealed penis in childhood: a spectrum of etiology and treatment. J Urol 1999; 162 (3 Pt 2): 1165-1168
  • 34 Philip I, Nicholas JL. Congenital giant prepucial sac: case reports. J Pediatr Surg 1999; 34 (03) 507-508
  • 35 Herndon CDA, Casale AJ, Cain MP, Rink RC. Long-term outcome of the surgical treatment of concealed penis. J Urol 2003; 170 (4 Pt 2): 1695-1697 , discussion 1697
  • 36 Rod J, Desmonts A, Petit T, Ravasse P. Congenital megaprepuce: a 12-year experience (52 cases) of this specific form of buried penis. J Pediatr Urol 2013; 9 (6 Pt A): 784-788
  • 37 Niño Jaime Francisco P, Parra Juan David I, Díaz Angeline R, Trujillo Nicolás V, Bonilla José Nicolás F. Frecuencia y desenlace de Balanitis Xerótica Obliterante en pacientes llevados a corrección de Hipospadias. Soc Colomb Urol 2013; 37 (02) 105