Download PDF
Thromb Haemost 1991; 65(03): 233-236
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1647490
Original Article
Schattauer GmbH Stuttgart

Failure of Computerized Impedance Plethysmography in the Diagnostic Management of Patients with Clinically Suspected Deep-Vein Thrombosis

P Prandoni
1   The Second Institute of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Padua, Italy
,
A W A Lensing
3   The Center for Thrombosis, Haemostasis and Atherosclerosis Research, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
,
H R Büller
3   The Center for Thrombosis, Haemostasis and Atherosclerosis Research, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
,
M Carta
1   The Second Institute of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Padua, Italy
,
M Vigo
2   The Second Hospital Service of Radiology, University Hospital of Padua, Italy
,
A Cogo
1   The Second Institute of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Padua, Italy
,
S Cuppini
1   The Second Institute of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Padua, Italy
,
J W ten Cate
3   The Center for Thrombosis, Haemostasis and Atherosclerosis Research, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received: 05 October 1990

Accepted after revision 05 November 1990

Publication Date:
02 July 2018 (online)

  PDF Download  Permissions and Reprints

Summary

Before a new diagnostic modality can be introduced in clinical medicine, the validity of both a normal and abnormal test result have to be assessed prospectively in an appropriate patient group. We have evaluated the clinical validity of. a new computerized impedance plethysmography (CIP) in the diagnostic management of 381 consecutive patients with clinically suspected venous thrombosis. In patients with serially normal CIP results, the diagnosis of venous thrombosis was refuted and, consequently, they were not treated with anticoagulant therapy and all were followed up for a period of 6 months to estimate the occurrence of symptomatic venous thromboembolism.

The study was prematurely terminated by the safety monitoring committee because of an unacceptably high incidence of confirmed venous thromboembolism (10 patients, 3.2%; 95% confidence interval: 1.6% to 6%), including 4 episodes of fatal pulmonary embolism. In a subsequent explanatory study using ultrasonography in 29 other symptomatic patients who had at least 2 repeated normal CIP test results, the failure of CIP to detect proximal vein thrombosis was confirmed in 4 patients (14%). The reasons for this failure are probably related to the use of a modified device to measure impedance in the CIP apparatus, resulting in a lower ability to separate patients without venous thrombosis from those with the disease.

We concluded that CIP is insensitive for the detection of proximal vein thrombosis and, therefore, not clinically useful in the diagnostic management of patients with suspected venous thrombosis.

 

  • REFERENCES

  • 1 Hull RD, Seeker-Walker RH, Hirsh J. The diagnosis of deep-vein thrombosis. In: Hemostasis and Thrombosis Colman RW, Hirsh J, Marder VJ, Salzman EW. (eds) JB Lippincott Company Philadelphia; 1987: 1229-1232
  • 2 Wheeler HB, Anderson FA, Cardullo PA. et al. Suspected deep vein thrombosis. Arch Surg 1982; 117: 1206-1209
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Hull Rd, Hirsh H, Carter JC. et al. Diagnostic efficacy of impedance plethysmography for clinically suspected deep vein thrombosis: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 1985; 102: 21-28
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Huisman MV, Btiller HR, ten Cate JW. et al. Management of clinically suspected acute venous thrombosis in outpatients with serial impedance plethysmography in a community setting. Arch Intern Med 1989; 149: 511-513
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Huisman MV, Btiller HR, ten Cate JW, Vreeken J. Serial impedance plethysmography for suspected deep venous thrombosis. N Engl J Med 1986; 314: 823-828
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Salzman EW. Venous thrombosis made easy. N Engl J Med 1986; 314: 847-848
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Hull RD, Hirsh J, Sackett DL. et al. Clinical validity of a negative venogram in patients with clinically suspected venous thrombosis. Circulation 1981; 64: 622-625
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Hull RD, van Aken WG, Hirsh J. et al. Impedance plethysmography using the occlusive cuff technique in the diagnosis of venous thrombosis. Circulation 1976; 53: 696-700
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Prandoni P, Lensing AWA, Huisman MV. et al. A new computerized impedance plethysmograph: accuracy in the detection of proximal vein thrombosis in symptomatic outpatients. Thromb Haemostas 1991; 65: 229-232
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Lensing AWA, Prandoni P, Brandjes D. et al. Accurate detection of deep-vein thrombosis by real-time B-mode ultrasonography. N Engl J Med 1989; 320: 342-345
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Hull RD, Raskob GE, Carter CJ. Serial impedance plethysmography in pregnant patients with clinically suspected deep-vein thrombosis. Ann Intern Med 1990; 112: 663-667
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Hull RD, Taylor W, Hirsh J. et al. Impedance plethysmography: the relationship between venous filling and sensitivity and specificity for proximal vein thrombosis. Circulation 1978; 58: 898-902
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Peura RA, Penney BC, Arcuri J, Anderson Jr FA, Wheeler HB. Influence of erythrocyte velocity on impedance plethysmographic measurements. Med Biol Eng Comput 1978; 16: 147-154
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Agnelli G, Longetti M, Cosmi B. et al. Diagnostic accuracy of the computerized impedance plethysmography in the diagnosis of symptomatic deep vein thrombosis: a venography controlled study. Angiol-ogy 1990; 41: 559-564
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar