Adjusting for Recall Bias with the Proportional Hazards Model

Abstract

In studying falling frequency in the elderly, we observed that having subjects keep a diary led to a larger number of falls reported than had been noted in a previous study in the same population. The previous study asked subjects to report any falls in the previous three months. We considered two related explanations for the observation of lower incidence reports with a 3-month recall survey. First, there may have been under-reporting of falls due to recall bias. Second, the less severe falls (which did not result in injuries) may not be reported. We suggest that the proportional hazards model may be used to adjust studies in which recall is used to determine incidence and time to falls.

Key-Words

Recall Bias - Adjustment - Proportional Hazards Model

• REFERENCES

• 1 Reinsch S, MacRae P, Lachenbruch P, Tobis J. Health promotion at senior center! for the prevention of falls. Submitted to J of Aging and Health..
• 2 Cummings S, Nevitt M, Kidd S. Forgetting falls: The limited accuracy of recall of falls in the elderly. J Amer Geriatric Soc 1988; 36: 613-16.
• 3 Cox DR, Oakes D. Analysis of Survival Data. London: Chapman and Hall.;
• 4 Greenspan I, McLellan BA, Greig H. Abbreviated injury scale and injury severity score: A scoring chart. J of Trauma 1985; 25: 60-A.