Download PDF
Methods Inf Med 2000; 39(01): 88-92
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1634247
Original Article
Schattauer GmbH

Evaluation of Techniques for the Presentation of Laboratory Data: Support of Pattern Recognition

J. O. O. Hoeke
1   Department of Clinical Chemistry, Dijkzigt University Hospital, Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands
,
B. Bonke
2   Department of Medical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands
,
R. van Strik
3   Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands
,
E. S. Gelsema
4   Department of Medical Informatics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
07 February 2018 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract:

Two tabular and two graphical techniques for the presentation of laboratory test results were compared in a reaction-time experiment with 22 volunteers. The experimental setup was designed to determine whether one or more of the presentation techniques facilitated the recognition of four predefined combinations of abnormal test results. Using a conventional, tabular presentation technique as a reference, faster median response times were obtained with each of the other three presentation techniques, irrespective of pattern. The effect on accuracy was less clear, possibly due to the small number of errors made.

Keywords:

Laboratory Test Results - Color Coding - Graphical Representation - Evaluation
 

  • REFERENCES

  • 1 Hoeke JOO, Gelsema ES, Wulkan RW, Leijnse B. Graphical non-linear representation of multi-dimensional laboratory measurements in their clinical context. Meth Inform Med 1991; 30: 138-44.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Hoaglin DC. Revising a display of multidimensional laboratory measurements to improve accuracy of perception. Meth Inform Med 1993; 32: 418-20.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Hoeke JOO, Verheij R, Gelsema ES. On the use of graphics to represent laboratory measurements. Meth Inform Med 1993; 32: 421.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Verheij R, Hoeke JOO, Bonke B, Van Strik R, Gelsema ES. Evaluation of techniques for the presentation of laboratory data. I: Time needed for interpretation. Meth Inform Med 1997; 36: 11-6.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Verheij R, Hoeke JOO, Bonke B, Van Strik R, Gelsema ES. Evaluation of techniques for the presentation of laboratory data. II: Accuracy of interpretation. Meth Inform Med 1997; 36: 17-9.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar