Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1580609
Do Obese Women Receive the Necessary Interventions to Achieve Vaginal Birth after Cesarean?
Publication History
16 October 2015
08 February 2016
Publication Date:
27 April 2016 (online)
![](https://www.thieme-connect.de/media/ajp/201610/lookinside/thumbnails/10-1055-s-0036-1580609_150378-1.jpg)
Abstract
Objective We aimed to determine if obese women undergoing trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC) were more likely to undergo repeat cesarean for arrest disorders prior to active labor, and whether this was due to decreased use of standard interventions to achieve vaginal birth.
Study Design This was a secondary analysis of a prospective registry. Women undergoing TOLAC with one prior cesarean and a singleton, term gestation who had a repeat cesarean for an arrest disorder were included. The primary outcome was repeat cesarean prior to active labor (cervical dilation < 6 cm). Obese (body mass index ≥30 kg/m2) and nonobese women were compared. Multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate the association between obesity and repeat cesarean prior to active labor. Clinical interventions were compared between groups using t-test and χ 2 test.
Results Among 2,098 women undergoing TOLAC, 1,454 (69%) were obese. Obese women were more likely to undergo repeat cesarean for an arrest disorder prior to active labor (odds ratio, 1.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.1–1.7) despite being allowed longer labors and receiving higher maximum doses of oxytocin for a longer duration than nonobese women.
Conclusion Obese women were more likely to undergo repeat cesarean prior to active labor despite more clinical interventions to achieve vaginal birth.
-
References
- 1 Carroll Sr CS, Magann EF, Chauhan SP, Klauser CK, Morrison JC. Vaginal birth after cesarean section versus elective repeat cesarean delivery: weight-based outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 188 (6) 1516-1520 , discussion 1520–1522
- 2 Durnwald CP, Ehrenberg HM, Mercer BM. The impact of maternal obesity and weight gain on vaginal birth after cesarean section success. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 191 (3) 954-957
- 3 Hibbard JU, Gilbert S, Landon MB , et al; National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. Trial of labor or repeat cesarean delivery in women with morbid obesity and previous cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 108 (1) 125-133
- 4 Juhasz G, Gyamfi C, Gyamfi P, Tocce K, Stone JL. Effect of body mass index and excessive weight gain on success of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2005; 106 (4) 741-746
- 5 Landon MB, Leindecker S, Spong CY , et al; National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. The MFMU Cesarean Registry: factors affecting the success of trial of labor after previous cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 193 (3, Pt 2) 1016-1023
- 6 Carlhäll S, Källén K, Blomberg M. Maternal body mass index and duration of labor. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2013; 171 (1) 49-53
- 7 Kominiarek MA, Zhang J, Vanveldhuisen P, Troendle J, Beaver J, Hibbard JU. Contemporary labor patterns: the impact of maternal body mass index. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011; 205 (3) 244.e1-244.e8
- 8 Conner SN, Tuuli MG, Longman RE, Odibo AO, Macones GA, Cahill AG. Impact of obesity on incision-to-delivery interval and neonatal outcomes at cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013; 209 (4) 386.e1-386.e6
- 9 Girsen AI, Osmundson SS, Naqvi M, Garabedian MJ, Lyell DJ. Body mass index and operative times at cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2014; 124 (4) 684-689
- 10 Metz TD, Stoddard GJ, Henry E, Jackson M, Holmgren C, Esplin S. How do good candidates for trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC) who undergo elective repeat cesarean differ from those who choose TOLAC?. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013; 208 (6) 458.e1-458.e6
- 11 National NIH ; National Institutes of Health. Clinical guidelines on the identification, evaluation, and treatment of overweight and obesity in adults—the evidence report. Obes Res 1998; 6 (Suppl. 02) 51S-209S
- 12 Zhang J, Troendle J, Mikolajczyk R, Sundaram R, Beaver J, Fraser W. The natural history of the normal first stage of labor. Obstet Gynecol 2010; 115 (4) 705-710
- 13 Carlson NS, Lowe NK. Intrapartum management associated with obesity in nulliparous women. J Midwifery Womens Health 2014; 59 (1) 43-53
- 14 Abenhaim HA, Benjamin A. Higher caesarean section rates in women with higher body mass index: are we managing labour differently?. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2011; 33 (5) 443-448
- 15 Garabedian MJ, Williams CM, Pearce CF, Lain KY, Hansen WF. Extreme morbid obesity and labor outcome in nulliparous women at term. Am J Perinatol 2011; 28 (9) 729-734
- 16 Pevzner L, Powers BL, Rayburn WF, Rumney P, Wing DA. Effects of maternal obesity on duration and outcomes of prostaglandin cervical ripening and labor induction. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 114 (6) 1315-1321
- 17 Zhang J, Bricker L, Wray S, Quenby S. Poor uterine contractility in obese women. BJOG 2007; 114 (3) 343-348
- 18 Chin JR, Henry E, Holmgren CM, Varner MW, Branch DW. Maternal obesity and contraction strength in the first stage of labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012; 207 (2) 129.e1-129.e6
- 19 Lowe NK, Corwin EJ. Proposed biological linkages between obesity, stress, and inefficient uterine contractility during labor in humans. Med Hypotheses 2011; 76 (5) 755-760
- 20 Moynihan AT, Hehir MP, Glavey SV, Smith TJ, Morrison JJ. Inhibitory effect of leptin on human uterine contractility in vitro. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006; 195 (2) 504-509
- 21 Mumtaz S, AlSaif S, Wray S, Noble K. Inhibitory effect of visfatin and leptin on human and rat myometrial contractility. Life Sci 2015; 125: 57-62
- 22 Graseck AS, Odibo AO, Tuuli M, Roehl KA, Macones GA, Cahill AG. Normal first stage of labor in women undergoing trial of labor after cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2012; 119 (4) 732-736
- 23 Alexander JM, McIntire DM, Leveno KJ. Chorioamnionitis and the prognosis for term infants. Obstet Gynecol 1999; 94 (2) 274-278
- 24 Henry DE, Cheng YW, Shaffer BL, Kaimal AJ, Bianco K, Caughey AB. Perinatal outcomes in the setting of active phase arrest of labor. Obstet Gynecol 2008; 112 (5) 1109-1115