Extreme Morbid Obesity and Labor Outcome in Nulliparous Women at Term

ABSTRACT

We examined the prevalence of cesarean delivery (CD) among women with morbid obesity and extreme morbid obesity. Using Kentucky birth certificate data, a cross-sectional analysis of nulliparous singleton gestations at term was performed. We examined the prevalence of CD by body mass index (BMI; in kg/m²) using the National Institutes of Health/World Health Organization schema and a modified schema that separates extreme morbid obesity (BMI ≥50) from morbid obesity (BMI ≥40 to <50). Bivariate and multivariate analyses were performed. Multivariate modeling controlled for maternal age, estimated gestational age, birth weight, diabetes, and hypertensive disorders. Overall, 83,278 deliveries were analyzed. CD was most common among women with a prepregnancy BMI ≥50 (56.1%, 95% confidence interval 50.9 to 61.4%). Extreme morbid obesity was most strongly associated with CD (adjusted odds ratio 4.99, 95% confidence interval 4.00 to 6.22). Labor augmentation decreased the likelihood of CD among women with extreme morbid obesity, but this failed to reach statistical significance. We speculate a qualitative or quantitative deficiency in the hormonal regulation of labor exists in the morbidly obese parturient. More research is needed to better understand the influence of morbid obesity on labor.

KEYWORDS

Cesarean delivery - extreme morbid obesity - labor outcome - birth certificate

REFERENCES

• 1 Sturm R. Increases in morbid obesity in the USA: 2000–2005.  Public Health. 2007;  121 492-496
• 2 Sturm R. Increases in clinically severe obesity in the United States, 1986–2000.  Arch Intern Med. 2003;  163 2146-2148
• 3 Buhimschi C S, Buhimschi I A, Malinow A M, Weiner C P. Intrauterine pressure during the second stage of labor in obese women.  Obstet Gynecol. 2004;  103 225-230
• 4 Abenhaim H A, Kinch R A, Morin L, Benjamin A, Usher R. Effect of prepregnancy body mass index categories on obstetrical and neonatal outcomes.  Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2007;  275 39-43
• 5 Sukalich S, Mingione M J, Glantz J C. Obstetric outcomes in overweight and obese adolescents.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;  195 851-855
• 6 Burstein E, Levy A, Mazor M, Wiznitzer A, Sheiner E. Pregnancy outcome among obese women: a prospective study.  Am J Perinatol. 2008;  25 561-566
• 7 Verdiales M, Pacheco C, Cohen W R. The effect of maternal obesity on the course of labor.  J Perinat Med. 2009;  37 651-655
• 8 Baeten J M, Bukusi E A, Lambe M. Pregnancy complications and outcomes among overweight and obese nulliparous women.  Am J Public Health. 2001;  91 436-440
• 9 Haeri S, Guichard I, Baker A M, Saddlemire S, Boggess K A. The effect of teenage maternal obesity on perinatal outcomes.  Obstet Gynecol. 2009;  113 (2 Pt 1) 300-304
• 10 Jensen H, Agger A O, Rasmussen K L. The influence of prepregnancy body mass index on labor complications.  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1999;  78 799-802
• 11 Joy S, Istwan N, Rhea D, Desch C, Stanziano G. The impact of maternal obesity on the incidence of adverse pregnancy outcomes in high-risk term pregnancies.  Am J Perinatol. 2009;  26 345-349
• 12 National Institutes of Health . Clinical Guidelines on the Identification, Evaluation, and Treatment of Overweight and Obesity in Adults—The Evidence Report.  Obes Res. 1998;  6 (Suppl 2) 51S-209S
• 13 World Health Organization .Obesity: Preventing and managing the global epidemic. Report of a WHO Consultation. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; March 20, 2000
• 14 Kleinbaum D G. Logistic Regression: A Self-Learning Text. New York: Springer-Verlag Inc.; 1994: 171-174
• 15 Greenland S, Rothman K J. Introduction to stratified analysis. In: Modern Epidemiology. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven Publishers; 1998: 253-279
• 16 Knight M, Kurinczuk J J, Spark P, Brocklehurst P. UK Obstetric Surveillance System . Extreme obesity in pregnancy in the United Kingdom.  Obstet Gynecol. 2010;  115 989-997
• 17 Alanis M C, Goodnight W H, Hill E G, Robinson C J, Villers M S, Johnson D D. Maternal super-obesity (body mass index >or = 50) and adverse pregnancy outcomes.  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2010;  89 924-930
• 18 Northam S, Knapp T R. The reliability and validity of birth certificates.  J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2006;  35 3-12
• 19 Reichman N E, Hade E M. Validation of birth certificate data. A study of women in New Jersey's HealthStart program.  Ann Epidemiol. 2001;  11 186-193
• 20 DiGiuseppe D L, Aron D C, Ranbom L, Harper D L, Rosenthal G E. Reliability of birth certificate data: a multi-hospital comparison to medical records information.  Matern Child Health J. 2002;  6 169-179
• 21 Zollinger T W, Przybylski M J, Gamache R E. Reliability of Indiana birth certificate data compared to medical records.  Ann Epidemiol. 2006;  16 1-10
• 22 Park S, Sappenfield W M, Bish C, Bensyl D M, Goodman D, Menges J. Reliability and validity of birth certificate prepregnancy weight and height among women enrolled in prenatal WIC program: Florida, 2005.  Matern Child Health J. 2009;  (November) 24 [Epub ahead of Print]
• 23 Dobie S A, Baldwin L M, Rosenblatt R A, Fordyce M A, Andrilla C HA, Hart L G. How well do birth certificates describe the pregnancies they report? The Washington State experience with low-risk pregnancies.  Matern Child Health J. 1998;  2 145-154