Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1330754
Fremdkörper im oberen Gastrointestinaltrakt
Foreign Bodies in the Upper Gastrointestinal TractPublication History
Publication Date:
06 March 2013 (online)
![](https://www.thieme-connect.de/media/endoheute/201301/lookinside/thumbnails/10.1055-s-0032-1330754-1.jpg)
Fremdkörper im oberen Gastrointestinaltrakt
Es erfolgte die notfallmäßige Vorstellung eines 7 Monate alten Säuglings mit der Frage der endoskopischen Entfernung einer größeren Anzahl verschluckter Nägel und spitzer Gegenstände. Der endoskopische Eingriff erfolgte im OP in Intubationsnarkose mit einem Standard-Gastroskop (Olympus GIF-Q180, Durchmesser 8,8 mm). Im Korpus fand sich ein Nagelkonglomerat mit angedauten Milchresten ([Abb. 2]).
![](https://www.thieme-connect.de/media/endoheute/201301/thumbnails/endheu-500_10-1055-s-0032-1330754-i1.jpg)
![Zoom Image](/products/assets/desktop/css/img/icon-figure-zoom.png)
![](https://www.thieme-connect.de/media/endoheute/201301/thumbnails/endheu-500_10-1055-s-0032-1330754-i2.jpg)
![Zoom Image](/products/assets/desktop/css/img/icon-figure-zoom.png)
Im Magen und vor allem im Ösophagus zeigten sich keine Schleimhautverletzungen durch die verschluckten Nägel. Das Bergen mithilfe eines Gummitrichters oder der Aufsatz einer Kappe zum Schutz des Ösophagus erfolgte nicht, da hiermit die Passage aufgrund der anatomischen Enge des oberen Ösophagus-Sphinkters nicht möglich war. Schließlich erfolgte die fraktionierte Bergung jedes einzelnen Nagels mit der Fasszange. Hierbei wurde sorgfältig darauf geachtet, mit der Zange die Spitze des Nagels zu fassen und den Nagel unter Luftinsufflation in Längsrichtung parallel zum Ösophagus ohne Wandberührung zu extrahieren. Auf diese Weise konnten in etwa 60 min 17 Nägel entfernt werden ([Abb. 3]).
![](https://www.thieme-connect.de/media/endoheute/201301/thumbnails/endheu-500_10-1055-s-0032-1330754-i3.jpg)
![Zoom Image](/products/assets/desktop/css/img/icon-figure-zoom.png)
Zwei Nägel hatten den Magen zum Untersuchungszeitpunkt bereits verlassen, konnten am nächsten Tag aber im Stuhl des Säuglings detektiert werden. Bei klinisch völligem Wohlbefinden erfolgte die Entlassung des Kindes am Folgetag.
-
Literatur
- 1 Gsell M, Perrig M, Eichelberger M et al. Body-packer & body-stuffer – a medical challenge. Praxis 2010; 99 (09) 533-544
- 2 Mosca S, Manes G, Martino R et al. Endoscopic management of foreign bodies in the upper gastrointestinal tract: report on a series of 414 adult patients. Endoscopy 2001; 33 (08) 692-696
- 3 Watanabe K, Kikuchi T, Katori Y et al. The usefulness of computed tomography in the diagnosis of impacted fish bones in the oesophagus. J Laryngol Otol 1998; 112 (04) 360-364
- 4 Coulier B, Tancredi MH, Ramboux A. Spiral CT and multidetector-row CT diagnosis of perforation of the small intestine caused by ingested foreign bodies. Eur Radiol 2004; 14 (10) 1918-1925
- 5 Ikenberry SO, Jue TL, Anderson MA et al. Management of ingested foreign bodies and food impactions. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 73 (06) 1085-1091
- 6 Ngan JH, Fok PJ, Lai EC et al. A prospective study on fish bone ingestion. Experience of 358 patients. Ann Surg 1990; 211 (04) 459-462
- 7 Piotto L, Gent R, Kirby CP et al. Preoperative use of ultrasonography to localize an ingested foreign body. Pediatr Radiol 2009; 39 (03) 299-301
- 8 Coulier B. Diagnostic ultrasonography of perforating foreign bodies of the digestive tract. J Belge Radiol 1997; 80 (01) 1-5
- 9 Ryan J, Perez-Avila CA, Cherukuri A et al. Using a metal detector to locate a swallowed ring pull. J Accid Emerg Med 1995; 12 (01) 64-65
- 10 Sacchetti A, Carraccio C, Lichenstein R. Hand-held metal detector identification of ingested foreign bodies. Pediatr Emerg Care 1994; 10 (04) 204-207
- 11 Lee JH, Kim HC, Yang DM et al. What is the role of plain radiography in patients with foreign bodies in the gastrointestinal tract?. Clin Imaging 2012; 36 (05) 447-454
- 12 Cheng W, Tam PK. Foreign-body ingestion in children: experience with 1,265 cases. J Pediatr Surg 1999; 34 (10) 1472-1476
- 13 Farmakakis T, Dessypris N, Alexe DM et al. Magnitude and object-specific hazards of aspiration and ingestion injuries among children in Greece. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2007; 71 (02) 317-324
- 14 Goktas O, Snidero S, Jahnke V et al. Foreign body aspiration in children: field report of a German hospital. Pediatr Int 2010; 52 (01) 100-103
- 15 Litovitz T, Schmitz BF. Ingestion of cylindrical and button batteries: an analysis of 2382 cases. Pediatrics 1992; 89 (04) 747-757
- 16 Kavanagh KT, Litovitz T. Miniature battery foreign bodies in auditory and nasal cavities. JAMA 1986; 255 (11) 1470-1472
- 17 Litovitz T, Whitaker N, Clark L. Preventing battery ingestions: an analysis of 8648 cases. Pediatrics 2010; 125 (06) 1178-1183
- 18 Litovitz T, Whitaker N, Clark L et al. Emerging battery-ingestion hazard: clinical implications. Pediatrics 2010; 125 (06) 1168-1177
- 19 Longstreth GF, Longstreth KJ, Yao JF. Esophageal food impaction: epidemiology and therapy. A retrospective, observational study. Gastrointest Endosc 2001; 53 (02) 193-198
- 20 Kirchner GI, Zuber-Jerger I, Endlicher E et al. Causes of bolus impaction in the esophagus. Surg Endosc 2011; 25 (10) 3170-3174
- 21 Larsson H, Bergquist H, Bove M. The incidence of esophageal bolus impaction: is there a seasonal variation?. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2011; 144 (02) 186-190
- 22 Reddy VM, Bennett W, Burrows SA et al. Recurrence of food bolus impaction of the oesophagus: a retrospective observational study. Int J Surg 2011; 9 (06) 464-466
- 23 Jenssen C, Dietrich CF, Burmester E. Malignant neoplasias of the gastrointestinal tract – endosonographic staging revisited. Z Gastroenterol 2011; 49 (03) 357-368
- 24 Moehler M, Al Batran SE, Andus T et al. German S3-guideline “Diagnosis and treatment of esophagogastric cancer”. Z Gastroenterol 2011; 49 (04) 461-531
- 25 Kerlin P, Jones D, Remedios M et al. Prevalence of eosinophilic esophagitis in adults with food bolus obstruction of the esophagus. J Clin Gastroenterol 2007; 41 (04) 356-361
- 26 Liacouras CA, Furuta GT, Hirano I et al. Eosinophilic esophagitis: updated consensus recommendations for children and adults. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2011; 128 (01) 3-20
- 27 Straumann A, Bussmann C, Zuber M et al. Eosinophilic esophagitis: analysis of food impaction and perforation in 251 adolescent and adult patients. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2008; 6 (05) 598-600
- 28 von Arnim U, Monkemuller K, Malfertheiner P et al. Eosinophilic esophagitis – pathogenesis, clinical presentation and therapeutic management. Z Gastroenterol 2007; 45 (12) 1257-1263
- 29 Sung SH, Jeon SW, Son HS et al. Factors predictive of risk for complications in patients with oesophageal foreign bodies. Dig Liver Dis 2011; 43 (08) 632-635
- 30 Lucendo AJ, Friginal-Ruiz AB, Rodriguez B. Boerhaave's syndrome as the primary manifestation of adult eosinophilic esophagitis. Two case reports and a review of the literature. Dis Esophagus 2011; 24 (02) E11-E15
- 31 Navines R, Gutierrez F, Arranz B et al. Long-Term and Bizarre Self-Injurious Behavior: An Approach to Underlying Psychological Mechanisms and Management. J Psychiatr Pract 2013; 19 (01) 65-71
- 32 Vassilev BN, Kazandziev PK, Losanoff JE et al. Esophageal “stars”: a sinister foreign body ingestion. South Med J 1997; 90 (02) 211-214
- 33 Rodriguez H, Passali GC, Gregori D et al. Management of foreign bodies in the airway and oesophagus. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2012; 76 (Suppl. 01) S84-S91
- 34 Schwartz GF, Polsky HS. Ingested foreign bodies of the gastrointestinal tract. Am Surg 1976; 42 (04) 236-238
- 35 Ciriza C, Garcia L, Suarez P et al. What predictive parameters best indicate the need for emergent gastrointestinal endoscopy after foreign body ingestion?. J Clin Gastroenterol 2000; 31 (01) 23-28
- 36 Eisen GM, Baron TH, Dominitz JA et al. Guideline for the management of ingested foreign bodies. Gastrointest Endosc 2002; 55 (07) 802-806
- 37 Marco DL, Sadaba P, Lastra Garcia-Baron P et al. Value of helical computed tomography in the management of upper esophageal foreign bodies. Acta Radiol 2004; 45 (04) 369-374
- 38 Otjen JP, Rohrmann Jr CA, Iyer RS. Imaging pediatric magnet ingestion with surgical-pathological correlation. Pediatr Radiol 2012; Epub ahead of print
- 39 Van Biervliet S, Van de Putte D, De Jaegher A et al. Multiple magnet ingestion: a real challenge for the paediatric surgeon. Acta Clin Belg 2012; 67 (04) 298-300
- 40 Liu S, Li J, Lv Y. Gastrointestinal damage caused by swallowing multiple magnets. Front Med 2012; 6 (03) 280-287
- 41 Williams I, Taniere P, Goh J. Young man presenting with recurrent food bolus impaction. Clin Med 2012; 12 (05) 486-488
- 42 Shim LS, Grehan M. Education and Imaging. Gastrointestinal: oesophageal perforation during endoscopy for food impaction in eosinophilic oesophagitis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2010; 25 (02) 428
- 43 Sperry SL, Crockett SD, Miller CB et al. Esophageal foreign-body impactions: epidemiology, time trends, and the impact of the increasing prevalence of eosinophilic esophagitis. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 74 (05) 985-991
- 44 Moreno-Borque R, Gisbert JP, Santander C. Pathophysiological bases of eosinophilic esophagitis therapy. Inflamm Allergy Drug Targets 2012; Epub ahead of print
- 45 Henderson CJ, Abonia JP, King EC et al. Comparative dietary therapy effectiveness in remission of pediatric eosinophilic esophagitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2012; 129 (06) 1570-1578