Gesundheitswesen 2013; 75(07): e101-e107
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1327748
Original Article
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Social Status as a Mediator of Self-Perceived Health, Quality of Life and Health-Related Behaviour in Obesity

Der soziale Status als Mediator der subjektiven Gesundheit, Lebensqualität und des Gesundheitsverhaltens bei Adipositas
N. T. Burkert
1   Medical University Graz, Institute of Social Medicine and Epidemiology, Austria
,
W. Freidl
1   Medical University Graz, Institute of Social Medicine and Epidemiology, Austria
,
J. Muckenhuber
1   Medical University Graz, Institute of Social Medicine and Epidemiology, Austria
,
F. Großschädl
1   Medical University Graz, Institute of Social Medicine and Epidemiology, Austria
,
W. J. Stronegger
1   Medical University Graz, Institute of Social Medicine and Epidemiology, Austria
,
É. Rásky
1   Medical University Graz, Institute of Social Medicine and Epidemiology, Austria
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
26 November 2012 (online)

Abstract

Objectives:

Obesity prevalence is increasing worldwide and associated with a high health risk. Unfavourable psychological factors, lower self-ratings of health and worse health-related behaviour can be found in individuals with a low socioeconomic status (SES). Therefore, the aim of our study was to investigate whether normal weight vs. obese subjects with a high vs. low socioeconomic status (SES) differ with regard to self-perceived health, quality of life and health-related behaviour.

Methods:

Data of the Austrian Health Interview Survey (ATHIS) 2006/07, precisely of 8015 subjects were analysed stratified by sex and adjusted by age concerning these outcomes.

Results:

The results have shown that men and women with a low SES differ significantly from those with a high SES in terms of self-perceived health, quality of life, intensity of physical activities, alcohol consumption, and eating behaviour (men: p <0.001; women: p<0.001). A significant interaction between the body mass index (BMI) and SES occurred in men concerning quality of life in the domains physical (p<0.05) and psychological health (p<0.01), in women as to self-perceived health (p<0.01), quality of life in the domains physical health (p<0.01) and environment (p<0.05), as well as physical activities (p<0.01).

Conclusion:

The SES has a strong negative impact on health-related variables, especially in obese subjects, and therefore risk assessment in the primary health-care setting should include socioeconomic factors. Furthermore, a continued strong public health programme is required with an absolute priority placed on obese subjects of low SES.

Zusammenfassung

Hintergrund:

Die Prävalenz der Adipositas nimmt weltweit zu und ist mit einem hohen Gesundheitsrisiko verbunden. Personen mit einem niedrigen sozioökonomischen Status (SES) weisen ungünstige psychologische Faktoren, ein schlechteres Gesundheitsverhalten, und eine schlechtere subjektive Gesundheit auf. Daher war das Ziel dieser Untersuchung Unterschiede zwischen normalgewichtigen und adipösen Personen mit einem hohen vs. niedrigen SES in Bezug auf deren subjektive Gesundheit, Lebensqualität und ihr Gesundheitsverhalten zu analysieren.

Methode:

Zur Prüfung der Fragestellung wurden die Daten der österreichischen Gesundheitsbefragung 2006/07 von 8015 Personen in Bezug auf diese Variablen geschlechtsstratifiziert und alterskorrigiert analysiert.

Ergebnisse:

Die Ergebnisse haben gezeigt, dass sich Männer wie auch Frauen mit einem niedrigen SES signifikant von jenen mit einem hohen SES in Bezug auf die subjektive Gesundheit, die Lebensqualität, die Intensität des Bewegungsverhaltens, den Alkoholkonsum und die Ernährung unterscheiden (Männer: p<0,001; Frauen: p<0,001). Weiters wurde eine signifikante Wechselwirkung zwischen dem Body Mass Index (BMI) und dem SES bei Männern in Bezug auf deren Lebensqualität in den Bereichen physische (p<0,05) und psychische Gesundheit (p<0,01), und bei Frauen hinsichtlich der subjektiven Gesundheit (p<0,01), der Lebensqualität im Bereich physischen Gesundheit (p<0,01) und Umgebungsfaktoren (p<0,05), sowie der Häufigkeit ihres Bewegungsverhaltens (p<0,01), festgestellt.

Schlussfolgerungen:

Der SES hat einen wesentlichen Einfluss auf gesundheitsrelevanter Variablen – vor allem bei Vorliegen von Adipositas – was beim Risikoscreening in der primärmedizinischen Versorgung berücksichtigt werden sollte. Weiters sind Gesundheitsprogramme, speziell für adipöse Personen mit niedrigem SES, dringend erforderlich.

 
  • References

  • 1 Branca F, Nikogosian H, Lobstein T. The challenge of obesity in the WHO European region and the strategies for response. Denmark: World Health Organization; 2007. Available at: http://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0008/98243/E89858.pdf
  • 2 von Lengerke T, Reitmeir P, John J. Direkte medizinische Kosten der (starken) Adipositas: ein Bottom-up-Vergleich über- vs. normalgewichtiger Erwachsener in der KORA-Studienregion. Das Gesundheitswesen 2006; 68: 110-115
  • 3 Brennan SL, Henry MJ, Nicholson GC et al. Socioeconomic status and risk factors for obesity and metabolic disorders in a population-based sample of adult females. Preventive Medicine 2009; 49: 165-171
  • 4 Ali SM, Lindstrom M. Socioeconomic, psychosocial, behavioural, and psychological determinants of BMI among young women: differing patterns for underweight and overweight/obesity. European journal of public health 2006; 16: 325-331
  • 5 Großschädel F, Stronegger W. Die Entwicklung der Adipositas in Österreich zwischen 1973 und 2007: Langzeittrends in der Prävalenz und soziodemografische Determinanten. Das Gesundheitswesen. 2011 8/9. 560-561
  • 6 Kilicarslan A, Isildak M, Guven GS et al. Demographic, socioeconomic and educational aspects of obesity in an adult population. Journal of the National Medical Association 2006; 98: 1313-1317
  • 7 Roskam A-J, Kunst A, Van Oyen H et al. Comparative appraisal of educational inequalities in overweight and obesity among adults in 19 European countries. International Journal of Epidemiology 2010; 39 (02) 392-404
  • 8 Amarasinghe A, D’Souza G, Brown C et al. The influence of socioeconomic and environmental determinants on health and obesity: A West Virginia case study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2009; 6: 2271-2287
  • 9 WHO . Consultation on Obesity. Obesity: Preventing and managing the global epidemic. Geneva: WHO 7-3-1997; 1998
  • 10 Burkert NT, Freidl W, Muckenhuber J et al. Self-perceived health, quality of life, and health-related behaviour: is social status a mediator?. Wiener klinische Wochenschrift 2012; 7-8: 271-275
  • 11 Großschädl F, Stronegger WJ. Long-term trends in obesity among Austrian adults and its relation with the social gradient: 1973-2007. European Journal of Public Health 2012; 1-7
  • 12 Burkert NT, Rásky E, Freidl W. Social inequalities regarding health and health behaviour in Austrian adults. Wiener klinische Wochenschrift 2012; 7-8: 256-261
  • 13 Bauer GF, Huber CA, Jenny GJ et al. Socioeconomic status, working conditions and self-rated health in Switzerland: explaining the gradient in men and women. International Journal of Public Health 2009; 54: 23-30
  • 14 Holstein BE, Currie C, Boyce W et al. and the HBSC Social Inequality Focus Group. Socio-economic inequality in multiple health complaints amond adolescents: international comparative study in 37 countries. International Journal of Public Health 2009; 54: S260-S270
  • 15 The Marmot Review . Stratetic Review of Health Inequalities in England. Fair Society, Healthy Lives; 2010. Available at: http://www.marmotreview.org/AssetLibrary/pdfs/Reports/FairSocietyHealthyLives.pdf
  • 16 Wamala SP, Wolk A, Orth-Gomer K.. Determinants of obesity in relation to socioeconomic status among middle-aged Swedish women. Preventive Medicine 1997; 26: 734-744
  • 17 Mackenbach JP. Health Inequalities: Europe in profile. 2006; Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/health/ph_determinants/socio_economics/documents/ev_060302_rd06_en.pdf
  • 18 Kuipers YM. Focusing on obesity through a health equity lens. A collection of innovative approaches and practices by European and international health promotion bodies to counteract obesity and improve health equity. EuroHealthNet 2010; Available at: http://www.eurohealthnet.eu/images/publications/ym%20kuipers%20-%20focusing%20on%20obesity%20through%20a%20health%20equity%20lens%20-%20edition%202.pdf
  • 19 Ferraro KF, Yu Y. Body weight and self-ratings of health. Journal of Health and Social Behavior 1995; 36: 274-284
  • 20 Appels A, Bosma H, Grabauskas V et al. Self-rated health and mortality in a Lithuanian and Dutch population. Social Sciences and Medicine 1996; 42: 681-689
  • 21 Barnekow-Bergkvist M, Hedeberg GE, Janlert U et al. Health status and health behaviour in men and women at the age of 34 years. European Journal of Public Health 1998; 8 (02) 179-182
  • 22 Klumbiene J, Petkevicience J, Helasoja V et al. Sociodemographic and health behaviour factors associated with obesity in adult populations in Estonia, Finland and Lithuania. European Journal of Public Health 2004; 14: 390-394
  • 23 García-Mendizábal MJ, Carrasco JM, Pérez-Gómez B et al. Role of educational level in the relationship between Body Mass Index (BMI) and health-related quality of life (HRQL) among rural Spanish women. BMC Public Health 2009; 9: 120-129
  • 24 Kinge JM, Morris S. Socioeconomic variation in the impact of obesity on health-related quality of life. Social Science and Medicine 2010; 71: 1864-1871
  • 25 Lantz PM, Golberstein E, House JS et al. Socioeconomic and behavioural risk factors for mortality in a national 19-year prospective study of U.S. adults. Social Science and Medicine 2010; 70: 1558-1566
  • 26 Adler NE, Newman K. Socioeconomic Disparities in health: Pathways and policies. Health Affair 2002; 21: 60-76
  • 27 Deshmukh-Taskar P, Nicklas TA, Yang SJ et al. Does food group consumption vary by differences in socioeconomic, demographic, and lifestyle factors in young adults? The Bogalusa Heart Study. Journal of the American Dietetic Association 2007; 107: 223-234
  • 28 Paalanen L, Praettaelae R, Palosuo H et al. Socio-economic differences in the consumption of vegetables, fruit and berries in Russian and Finnish Karelia: 1992-2007. European Journal of Public Health 2011; 21: 35-42
  • 29 Kaphingst KA, Bennett GG, Sorensen G et al. Body mass index, physical activity, and dietary behaviours among members of an urban community fitness center: a questionnaire survey. BMC Public Health 2007; 7: 181-189
  • 30 Wee HL, Wu Y, Thumboo J et al. Association of body mass index with short-form 36 physical and mental component summary scores in a multiethnic Asian population. International Journal of Obesity 2010; 34: 1034-1043
  • 31 Ahn SA, Zhao H, Tai-Seale M et al. The longitudinal effects of behavioural, health, and socio-demographic factors on body mass index among older Chinese adults. International Journal of Public Health Apr 8 2011; ahead for print
  • 32 Toschke AM, Luedde R, Eisele R et al. The obesity epidemic in young men is not confined to low social classes – a time series of 18-year-old German men at medical examination for military service with different educational attainment. International Journal of Obesity 2005; 29: 875-877
  • 33 Klimont J, Kytir J, Leitner A. Österreichische Gesundheitsbefragung 2006/07. Hauptergebnisse und methodische Dokumentation. Wien: Statistik Austria; 2007
  • 34 OECD Social Policy Division “What are equivalence scales?” 2009 Available at: http://www.oecd.org/els/social
  • 35 World Health Organization . WHOQOL-BREF. Introduction, Administration, Scoring, and Generic Version of the Assessment. WHO; Geneva: 1996. http://www.who.int/mental_health/media/en/76.pdf
  • 36 Brennan SL, Henry MJ, Nicholson GC et al. Socioeconomic status, obesity and lifestyle in men: The geelong osteoporosis study. Journal of Men’s Health 2010; 7: 31-41