Eur J Pediatr Surg 2010; 20(5): 316-320
DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1255038
Original Article

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Greenstick Fractures of the Middle Third of the Forearm. A Prospective Multi-Centre Study

T. Schmuck1 , S. Altermatt2 , P. Büchler3 , D. Klima-Lange4 , A. Krieg5 , N. Lutz6 , J. Muermann7 , T. Slongo8 , R. Sossai9 , C. Hasler5
  • 1District Hospital Langenthal, Department of Orthopaedics, Langenthal,Switzerland
  • 2University Children's Hospital, Paediatric Surgery, Zurich, Switzerland
  • 3University of Bern, Institute for Surgical Technology and Biomechanics,Bern, Switzerland
  • 4Ostschweizer Kinderspital St. Gallen, Pediatric Surgery, St. Gallen,Switzerland
  • 5University Children's Hospital, Orthopaedic Department, Basel, Switzerland
  • 6Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Paediatric Surgery, Lausanne,Switzerland
  • 7Children's Hospital, University of Bern, Surgical Paediatrics, Bern,Switzerland
  • 8University Children's Hospital, Department of Paediatric Surgery, Bern,Switzerland
  • 9Children's Hospital, Department of Paediatric Surgery, Lucerne, Switzerland
Further Information

Publication History

received December 14, 2009

accepted after revision April 17, 2010

Publication Date:
24 June 2010 (online)

Abstract

Background: Greenstick fractures suffered during growth have a high risk for refracture and posttraumatic deformity, particularly at the forearm diaphysis. The use of a preemptive completion of the fracture by manipulation of the concave cortex is controversial and data supporting this approach are few.

Aim: Aim of this study was to determine the factors which predispose to refracture and deformities, and to define therapeutic strategies.

Methods: We prospectively gathered clinical and radiographic data over a period of one year on greenstick fractures of the middle third of the forearm in children as part of a multi-centre study. Endpoint was a follow-up visit at one year. Radiographic deformity, state of consolidation at resumption of physical activities and refracture rate were analysed statistically (ANOVA, Student's t-test and Pearson's chi-square test) with regard to patient age, gender, fracture type, therapy and time in plaster.

Results: We collected the data of 103 patients (63 boys, 40 girls), average age 6.6 years (1.3–14.5 years), the vast majority of whom had a combined greenstick fracture of the radius and ulna. 6.7% of the patients sustained a refracture within 49 days (29–76) after plaster removal. They were significantly older (p=0.017) with a significantly higher incidence of manual completion of the fracture with radiographic signs of partial consolidation (p=0.025). Residual deformities were significantly smaller after completion of the fracture compared to reduction without completion (p=0.019) or plaster fixation alone (p<0.005).

Conclusions: Completion of a greenstick fracture does not prevent refracture. Nevertheless, it diminishes the extent of secondary deformities in cases where the primary angulation exceeds the remodelling capacity. Prevention of refracture should include a routine radiographic follow-up 4–6 weeks after injury with continuation of plaster fixation in cases of partial consolidation.

References

  • 1 Gruber R, von Laer LR. [Etiology of the refracture of the forearm in childhood (author's transl)].  Aktuelle Traumatol. 1979;  9 251-259
  • 2 Alpar EK, Thompson K, Owen R. et al . Midshaft fractures of forearm bones in children.  Injury. 1981;  13 153-158
  • 3 Davis DR, Green DP. Forearm fractures in children: pitfalls and complications.  Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1976;  120 172-183
  • 4 Voto SJ, Weiner DS, Leighley B. Redisplacement after closed reduction of forearm fractures in children.  J Pediatr Orthop. 1990;  10 79-84
  • 5 Schwarz N, Pienaar S, Schwarz AF. et al . Refracture of the forearm in children.  J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1996;  78 740-744
  • 6 Worlock P, Stower M. Fracture patterns in Nottingham children.  J Pediatr Orthop. 1986;  6 656-660
  • 7 Bould M, Bannister GC. Refractures of the radius and ulna in children.  Injury. 1999;  30 583-586
  • 8 Baitner AC, Perry A, Lalonde FD. et al . The healing forearm fracture: a matched comparison of forearm refractures.  J Pediatr Orthop. 2007;  27 743-747
  • 9 Tredwell SJ, Van Peteghem K, Clough M. Pattern of forearm fractures in children.  J Pediatr Orthop. 1984;  4 604-608
  • 10 Slongo T, Audige L, Clavert JM. et al . The AO comprehensive classification of pediatric long-bone fractures: a web-based multicenter agreement study.  J Pediatr Orthop. 2007;  27 171-180
  • 11 Tarr RR, Garfinkel AI, Sarmiento A. The effects of angular and rotational deformities of both bones of the forearm. An in vitro study.  J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1984;  66 65-70
  • 12 Landin LA. Epidemiology of children's fractures.  J Pediatr Orthop B. 1997;  6 79-83
  • 13 Lascombes P, Poncelet T, Lesur E. et al . [Repeat fractures of the 2 forearm bones in children].  Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 1988;  74 (S 02) 137-139

Correspondence

PD Carol Hasler

University Children's Hospital

Orthopaedic Department

PO Box 4005 Basel

Switzerland

Phone: +41 61 685 5350

Fax: +41 61 685 5006

Email: carol.hasler@bluewin.ch

    >