Semin Hear 2010; 31(2): 095-103
DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1252101
© Thieme Medical Publishers

Enhancing Conversational Fluency: Training Conversation Partners in the Use of Clear Speech and Other Strategies

Rachel Caissie1 , Meghan Tranquilla2
  • 1School of Human Communication Disorders, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
  • 2Nova Scotia Hearing and Speech Centres, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
02 June 2010 (online)

ABSTRACT

An essential component of audiological rehabilitation involves guiding spouses, family members, and friends to interact with people with hearing impairment in manners that enhance conversational fluency. One aspect consists of teaching frequent conversation partners how to use strategies, such as repair strategies or topic-shifting strategies, or producing speech that is easier to perceive—a mode known as “clear speech”—to promote successful conversational exchanges. This article reviews some of the conversation partner behaviors that can influence message perception and potentially lead to communication breakdowns during conversation. Differences in the acoustic characteristics of speech spoken conversationally versus clearly are described, and the benefit of using clear speech to improve speech perception by individuals with hearing impairment is highlighted. It is advocated that conversation partners use clear speech specifically when conversational difficulties are anticipated or experienced such as when repairing breakdowns, shifting conversation topics, or conversing in challenging environments. It is stressed that providing an intervention session on clear speech, coupled with opportunities for partners to practice clear speech techniques, may be most effective in yielding changes in partners' speaking style. Finally, the nuts and bolts of a clear speech intervention program for frequent conversation partners are provided.

REFERENCES

  • 1 Hétu R, Jones L, Getty L. The impact of acquired hearing impairment on intimate relationships: implications for rehabilitation.  Audiology. 1993;  32 363-381
  • 2 Scarinci N, Worrall L, Hickson L. The effect of hearing impairment in older people on the spouse.  Int J Audiol. 2008;  47 141-151
  • 3 Stark P, Hickson L. Outcomes of hearing aid fitting for older people with hearing impairment and their significant others.  Int J Audiol. 2004;  43 390-398
  • 4 Tye-Murray N. Foundations of Aural Rehabilitation: Children, Adults, and Their Family Members. New York; Delmar Learning 2004
  • 5 Erber N. Communication Therapy for Adults with Sensory Loss. Melbourne, Australia; Clavis Publishing 1996
  • 6 Caissie R. Conversational topic shifting and the effect on communication breakdowns for individuals with hearing loss.  Volta Review. 2001;  102 45-56
  • 7 Caissie R, Campbell M N, Frenette W L, Scott L, Howell I, Roy A. Clear speech for adults with a hearing loss: does intervention with communication partners make a difference?.  J Am Acad Audiol. 2005;  16 157-171
  • 8 Ferguson S H, Kewley-Port D. Vowel intelligibility in clear and conversational speech for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.  J Acoust Soc Am. 2002;  112 259-271
  • 9 Payton K L, Uchanski R M, Braida L D. Intelligibility of conversational and clear speech in noise and reverberation for listeners with normal and impaired hearing.  J Acoust Soc Am. 1994;  95 1581-1592
  • 10 Caissie R, Dawe A, Donovan C, Brooks H, MacDonald S. Conversational performance of adults with a hearing loss.  J Acad Rehabil Audiol. 1998;  31 45-67
  • 11 Caissie R, Gibson C L. The effectiveness of repair strategies used by people with hearing losses and their conversational partners.  Volta Review. 1997;  99 203-218
  • 12 Tye-Murray N, Witt S. Conversational moves and conversational styles of adult cochlear-implant users.  J Acad Rehabil Audiol. 1996;  29 11-25
  • 13 Gagné J P, Wyllie K. Relative effectiveness of three repair strategies on the visual identification of misperceived words.  Ear Hear. 1989;  10 368-374
  • 14 Heine C, Erber N P, Osborn R, Browning C J. Communication perceptions of older adults with sensory loss and their communication partners: implications for intervention.  Disabil Rehabil. 2002;  24 356-363
  • 15 Lind C, Hickson L, Erber N P. Conversation repair and cochlear implantation: a qualitative case study.  Cochlear Implants Int. 2006;  7 33-48
  • 16 Gibson C L, Caissie R. The effectiveness of repair strategy intervention with a hearing-impaired adult.  J Speech Lang Pathol Audiol. 1994;  18 14-22
  • 17 Erber N P. Communication and Adult Hearing Loss. Melbourne; Clavis Publishing 1993
  • 18 Tye-Murray N, Schum L. Conversation training for frequent communication partners. In: Gagné JP, Tye-Murray N Research in Audiological Rehabilitation: Current Trends and Future Directions. J Acad Rehab Audiology [monograph supplement] 1994 XXVII: 209-222
  • 19 Wayner D, Abrahamson J. Learning to Hear Again: An Audiologic Rehabilitation Curriculum. Austin, TX; Hear Again 1996
  • 20 Picheny M A, Durlach N I, Braida L D. Speaking clearly for the hard of hearing. II: Acoustic characteristics of clear and conversational speech.  J Speech Hear Res. 1986;  29 434-446
  • 21 Schum D J. Beyond hearing aids: clear speech training as an intervention strategy.  Hear J. 1997;  50 36-39
  • 22 Clark J G, English K M. Counselling in Audiologic Practice. Boston; Allyn and Bacon 2004
  • 23 Bradlow A R, Kraus N, Hayes E. Speaking clearly for children with learning disabilities: sentence perception in noise.  J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2003;  46 80-97
  • 24 Ferguson S H, Kewley-Port D. Talker differences in clear and conversational speech: acoustic characteristics of vowels.  J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2007;  50 1241-1255
  • 25 Bradlow A R, Torretta G M, Pisoni D B. Intelligibility of normal speech I: global and fine-grained acoustic-phonetic talker characteristics.  Speech Commun. 1996;  20 255-272
  • 26 Picheny M A, Durlach N I, Braida L D. Speaking clearly for the hard of hearing I: intelligibility differences between clear and conversational speech.  J Speech Hear Res. 1985;  28 96-103
  • 27 Gagné J P, Querengesser C, Folkeard P, Munhall K G, Masterson V M. Auditory, visual, and audiovisual speech intelligibility for sentence-length stimuli: an investigation of conversational and clear speech.  Volta Review. 1995;  97 33-51
  • 28 Helfer K S. Auditory and auditory-visual perception of clear and conversational speech.  J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1997;  40 432-443
  • 29 Schum D J. Intelligibility of clear and conversational speech of young and elderly talkers.  J Am Acad Audiol. 1996;  7 212-218
  • 30 Uchanski R M, Choi S S, Braida L D, Reed C M, Durlach N I. Speaking clearly for the hard of hearing. IV: Further studies of the role of speaking rate.  J Speech Hear Res. 1996;  39 494-509
  • 31 Gagné J P, Masterson V M, Munhall K G, Bilida N, Querengesser C. Across talker variability in auditory, visual, and audiovisual speech intelligibility for conversational and clear speech.  J Acad Rehabil Audiol. 1994;  27 135-158
  • 32 Ferguson S H. Talker differences in clear and conversational speech: vowel intelligibility for normal-hearing listeners.  J Acoust Soc Am. 2004;  116 2365-2373
  • 33 Tranquilla M. Clear speech intervention and its effect on speech perception in noise. Unpublished Master's thesis. Dalhousie University, Canada; 2009
  • 34 Tye-Murray N, Witt S. Communication strategies training.  Semin Hear. 1997;  18 153-165

Rachel CaissiePh.D. 

School of Human Communication Disorders, Dalhousie University

5599 Fenwick St., Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada, B3H 1R2

Email: rcaissie@dal.ca

    >