Aktuelle Neurologie 2010; 37(4): e2-e22
DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1223537
Guidelines

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Primary and secondary prevention of cerebral ischemia

Joint Guidelines of the German Society of Neurology (DGN) and German Stroke Society (DSG)H.-C.  Diener1 , F.  Aichner2 , C.  Bode3 , M.  Böhm4 , H.-H.  Eckstein5 , K.  Einhäupl6 , M.  Endres7 , F.  Forsting8 , S.  Gesenhues9 , M.  Grond10 , R.  L.  Haberl11 , W.  Hacke12 , M.  Hennerici13 , P.  Lyrer14 , A.  Link15 , B.  Ringelstein16 , P.  A.  Ringleb12 , J.  Schrader17 , C.  Weimar1
  • 1Department of Neurology, University Hospital Essen
  • 2Neurological Department, Wagner-Jauregg-Krankenhaus, Linz, Austria
  • 3Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Freiburg
  • 4Department of Internal Medicine III, University of the Saarland Homburg/Saar
  • 5Department of Vascular Surgery, TU Munich
  • 6Department of Neurology, University Hospital, Charité, Berlin
  • 7Department of Neurology und Clinical Neurophysiology, Charité, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin
  • 8Department of Diagnostic und Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen
  • 9Institute of General Medicine, University Hospital Essen
  • 10Department of Neurology, Kreisklinikum Siegen (DSG)
  • 11Department of Neurology, Klinikum Harlaching, Städt. Klinikum München GmbH
  • 12Department of Neurology, University Hospital Heidelberg (DSG)
  • 13University Department of Neurology, University of Mannheim
  • 14Neurological Department, University Hospital Basel, Switzerland
  • 15Neurologist in private practice, Celle
  • 16Department of Neurology, University Hospital Münster
  • 17Department of Internal Medicine, St. Joseph-Hospital, Cloppenburg
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Publikationsdatum:
21. Mai 2010 (online)

Preview

Classification of level of evidence

↑↑ Efficacy and usefulness is well supported by multiple appropriate clinical studies (i.e. controlled randomized trials), either one or more metaanalyses or systematic reviews.

↑Efficacy and usefulness is supported by at least one appropriate clinical study (i.e. controlled randomized trial).

↓↓ Lack of efficacy is well supported by one or more appropriate clinical studies (i.e. controlled randomized trial), either one or more metaanalyses or systematic reviews.

↔ No study results exist to prove any benefit or harm. This can be due lack of appropriate studies, or several studies with controversial results.

Literature

Prof. Dr. Hans-Christoph Diener

Department of Neurology
University Hospital Essen

Hufelandstr. 55

45147 Essen

eMail: h.diener@uni-essen.de