Pharmacopsychiatry 1977; 10(3): 185-192
DOI: 10.1055/s-0028-1094539
Originalarbeiten

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

“Statistische Auswertung”: Voraussetzungen und Methoden

Statistical Evaluation – Presumptions and MethodsH. Immich
  • Institut für Medizinische Dokumentation, Statistik und Datenverarbeitung der Universität Heidelberg
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
20 January 2009 (online)

Zusammenfassung

Präzise Fragestellungen und weitere wesentliche Voraussetzungen für eine sinnvolle Auswertung werden erörtert. Für jede Fragestellung werden, falls vorhanden, geeignete Auswertungsmodelle angegeben.

Summary

Any reasonable evaluation presupposes a precise question. Furthermore it is necessary to eliminate all factors of disturbance, which are able either to simulate or to mask a result of evaluation. The most important of these factors is the psychiatrist himself. Therefore, experimental designs have to taken in account the factor psychiatrist. Criteria of the effects of any drug must be relevant with regard to comparison of two ore more drug effects. The reproduciability of criteria is very desirable, but a wish-fulfilment under the most circumstances. Because criteria should be independent and mutually exclusive, all scales like the Hamiltons one are not suitable for evaluation. Finally one should use as few criteria as possible. Models of evaluation are described far the most frequent questions in connection with clinical trials in psychopharmacology.

    >