Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Methods Inf Med 2023; 62(03/04): 100-109
DOI: 10.1055/a-2015-1244
Original Article

Prehospital Cardiac Arrest Should be Considered When Evaluating Coronavirus Disease 2019 Mortality in the United States

Nick Williams
1   National Library of Medicine, Lister Hill National Center for Biomedical Communications, Bethesda, Maryland, United States
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background Public health emergencies leave little time to develop novel surveillance efforts. Understanding which preexisting clinical datasets are fit for surveillance use is of high value. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) offers a natural applied informatics experiment to understand the fitness of clinical datasets for use in disease surveillance.

Objectives This study evaluates the agreement between legacy surveillance time series data and discovers their relative fitness for use in understanding the severity of the COVID-19 emergency. Here fitness for use means the statistical agreement between events across series.

Methods Thirteen weekly clinical event series from before and during the COVID-19 era for the United States were collected and integrated into a (multi) time series event data model. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) COVID-19 attributable mortality, CDC's excess mortality model, national Emergency Medical Services (EMS) calls, and Medicare encounter level claims were the data sources considered in this study. Cases were indexed by week from January 2015 through June of 2021 and fit to Distributed Random Forest models. Models returned the variable importance when predicting the series of interest from the remaining time series.

Results Model r2 statistics ranged from 0.78 to 0.99 for the share of the volumes predicted correctly. Prehospital data were of high value, and cardiac arrest (CA) prior to EMS arrival was on average the best predictor (tied with study week). COVID-19 Medicare claims volumes can predict COVID-19 death certificates (agreement), while viral respiratory Medicare claim volumes cannot predict Medicare COVID-19 claims (disagreement).

Conclusion Prehospital EMS data should be considered when evaluating the severity of COVID-19 because prehospital CA known to EMS was the strongest predictor on average across indices.

Keywords

Random Forest - COVID-19 - public health - statistical models - syndromic surveillance


Publication History

Received: 31 March 2022

Accepted: 04 January 2023

Accepted Manuscript online:
18 January 2023

Article published online:
27 February 2023

© 2023. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • References

  • 1 Le Duc JW, Sorvillo TE. A quarter century of emerging infectious diseases---where have we been and where are we going?. Acta Med Acad 2018; 47 (01) 117-130
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Polonsky JA, Baidjoe A, Kamvar ZN. et al. Outbreak analytics: a developing data science for informing the response to emerging pathogens. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2019; 374 (1776): 20180276
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Wu JT, Leung K, Lam TTY. et al. Nowcasting epidemics of novel pathogens: lessons from COVID-19. Nat Med 2021; 27 (03) 388-395
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Bhatia S, Lassmann B, Cohn E. et al. Using digital surveillance tools for near real-time mapping of the risk of infectious disease spread. NPJ Digit Med 2021; 4 (01) 73
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Leung K, Wu JT, Leung GM. Real-time tracking and prediction of COVID-19 infection using digital proxies of population mobility and mixing. Nat Commun 2021; 12 (01) 1501
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Redd SC, Frieden TR. CDC's evolving approach to emergency response. Health Secur 2017; 15 (01) 41-52
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Li BZ, Li MS, Huang JY, Chen YY, Lu YH. [Expanding the pandemic influenza preparedness framework to the epidemic of COVID-19]. Chin J Prev Med 2020; 54 (06) 597-601
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Tam T. Fifteen years post-SARS: key milestones in Canada's public health emergency response. Can Commun Dis Rep 2018; 44 (05) 98-101
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Martinello RA. Preparing for avian influenza. Curr Opin Pediatr 2007; 19 (01) 64-70
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Gibson PJ, Theadore F, Jellison JB. The common ground preparedness framework: a comprehensive description of public health emergency preparedness. Am J Public Health 2012; 102 (04) 633-642
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Brower JL. The threat and response to infectious diseases (Revised). Microb Ecol 2018; 76 (01) 19-36
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 National Pandemic Influenza Plans | Pandemic Influenza (Flu) | CDC [Internet].. 2018 [cited 2022 Jan 18]. Accessed January 31, 2022 at: https://www.cdc.gov/flu/pandemic-resources/planning-preparedness/national-strategy-planning.html
    PubMed
  • 13 Pandemic Influenza Preparedness, Response and Recovery Guide for Critical Infrastructure and Key Resources.:84.
    PubMed
  • 14 Wang Q, Zhang T, Zhu H. et al. Characteristics of and public health emergency responses to COVID-19 and H1N1 outbreaks: a case-comparison study. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020; 17 (12) E4409
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Viglione G. How many people has the coronavirus killed?. Nature 2020; 585 7823 22-24
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Zhu H, Wang Q, Zhang T. et al. Initial public-health emergency response to SARS and COVID-19 pandemics in mainland china: a retrospective comparative study. Risk Manag Healthc Policy 2021; 14: 4199-4209
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Lee H-Y, Oh M-N, Park Y-S, Chu C, Sona T-J. Public health emergency preparedness and response in Korea. J Korean Med Assoc 2017; 60 (04) 296-299
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Wang V. . Why China Is the World's Last ‘Zero Covid’ Holdout. The New York Times [Internet]. 2021 Oct 28 [cited 2022 Jan 18]. Accessed January 01, 2023 at: https://www.nytimes.com/2021/10/27/world/asia/china-zero-covid-virus.html
    PubMed
  • 19 Huang P, Ruwitch J. . What the U.S. can learn from China's response to COVID infections. NPR [Internet]. 2021 Nov 8 [cited 2022 Jan 18]. Accessed January 01, 2023 at: https://www.npr.org/2021/11/08/1053647178/what-the-u-s-can-learn-from-chinas-response-to-covid-infections
    PubMed
  • 20 Why China is still trying to achieve zero Covid. BBC News [Internet]. 2021 Nov 15 [cited 2022 Jan 18]. Accessed January 1, 2023 at: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-59257496
    PubMed
  • 21 Beaney T, Clarke JM, Jain V. et al. Excess mortality: the gold standard in measuring the impact of COVID-19 worldwide?. J R Soc Med 2020; 113 (09) 329-334
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Iuliano AD, Chang HH, Patel NN. et al. Estimating under-recognized COVID-19 deaths, United States, March 2020-May 2021 using an excess mortality modelling approach. Lancet Reg Health Am 2021; 1: 100019
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Rossen LM. Notes from the field: update on excess deaths associated with the COVID-19 Pandemic—United States, January 26, 2020–February 27, 2021. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2021;70. Accessed January 1, 2023 at: cited 2021 Dec 15 [Internet] https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/wr/mm7015a4.htm
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Rossen LM. . Excess Deaths Associated with COVID-19, by Age and Race and Ethnicity — United States, January 26–October 3, 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2022 Jan 11];69. Accessed January 1, 2023 at: https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/69/wr/mm6942e2.htm
    PubMed
  • 25 Stokes AC, Lundberg DJ, Elo IT, Hempstead K, Bor J, Preston SH. COVID-19 and excess mortality in the United States: a county-level analysis. PLoS Med 2021; 18 (05) e1003571
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Woolf SH, Chapman DA, Sabo RT, Weinberger DM, Hill L. Excess deaths from COVID-19 and other causes, March-April 2020. JAMA 2020; 324 (05) 510-513
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Woolf SH, Chapman DA, Sabo RT, Weinberger DM, Hill L, Taylor DDH. Excess deaths from COVID-19 and other causes, March-July 2020. JAMA 2020; 324 (15) 1562-1564
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Farrington CP, Andrews NJ, Beale AD, Catchpole MA. A statistical algorithm for the early detection of outbreaks of infectious disease. J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc 1996; 159 (03) 547-563
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Noufaily A, Enki DG, Farrington P, Garthwaite P, Andrews N, Charlett A. An improved algorithm for outbreak detection in multiple surveillance systems. Stat Med 2013; 32 (07) 1206-1222
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Dawson DE. National Emergency Medical Services Information System (NEMSIS). Prehosp Emerg Care 2006; 10 (03) 314-316
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Mann NC, Kane L, Dai M, Jacobson K. Description of the 2012 NEMSIS public-release research dataset. Prehosp Emerg Care 2015; 19 (02) 232-240
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Handberry M, Bull-Otterson L, Dai M. et al. Changes in Emergency Medical Services Before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States, January 2018-December 2020. Clin Infect Dis 2021; 73 (Suppl (Suppl. 01) S84-S91
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Distributed Random Forest (DRF)—H2O 3.36.0.1 documentation [Internet].. [cited 2022 Jan 14]. Accessed January 1. 2023 at: https://docs.h2o.ai/h2o/latest-stable/h2o-docs/data-science/drf.html
    PubMed
  • 34 Onozuka D, Hagihara A. Extreme influenza epidemics and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Int J Cardiol 2018; 263: 158-162
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Moa A, Tan T, Wei J, Hutchinson D, MacIntyre CR. Burden of influenza in adults with cardiac arrest admissions in Australia. Int J Cardiol 2022; 361: 109-115
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Čulić V, AlTurki A, Proietti R. Public health impact of daily life triggers of sudden cardiac death: a systematic review and comparative risk assessment. Resuscitation 2021; 162: 154-162
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Duijster JW, Doreleijers SDA, Pilot E. et al. Utility of emergency call centre, dispatch and ambulance data for syndromic surveillance of infectious diseases: a scoping review. Eur J Public Health 2020; 30 (04) 639-647
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 McVaney KE, Pepe PE, Maloney LM. et al; Writing group on behalf of the Metropolitan EMS Medical Directors Global Alliance. The relationship of large city out-of-hospital cardiac arrests and the prevalence of COVID-19. EClinicalMedicine 2021; 34: 100815
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Riesgo LGC, Ziemann A, Rosenkoetter N. et al. Use of routinely collected emergency medical data for earlier detection of health threats in Europe: first evaluation results of the SIDARTHa syndromic surveillance system. Resuscitation 2010; 81 (02) S7
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Yadav R, Bansal R, Budakoty S, Barwad P. COVID-19 and sudden cardiac death: a new potential risk. Indian Heart J 2020; 72 (05) 333-336
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Brodeur A, Gray D, Islam A, Bhuiyan S. A literature review of the economics of COVID-19. J Econ Surv 2021; 35 (04) 1007-1044
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Bergquist S, Otten T, Sarich N. COVID-19 pandemic in the United States. Health Policy Technol 2020; 9 (04) 623-638
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Xu HD, Basu R. How the United States flunked the COVID-19 Test: some observations and several lessons. Am Rev Public Adm 2020; 50 6–7 568-576
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Data Modernization Initiative [Internet]. [cited 2022 Jan 18]. Accessed January 31, 2023 at: 2021 https://www.cdc.gov/surveillance/data-modernization/index.html
    PubMed