CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Nervenheilkunde 2023; 42(05): 294-306
DOI: 10.1055/a-2000-7087
Schwerpunkt

Glaubensvorgänge und Glaubensinhalte

Neurowissenschaftliche Perspektiven für alte FragenProcesses of believing and contents of beliefsNeuroscientific perspectives for old questions
Rüdiger J. Seitz
1   Abteilung Neurologie, Zentrum für Neurologie und Neuropsychiatrie, LVR-Klinikum Düsseldorf – Kliniken der Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Medizinische Fakultät
› Author Affiliations

ZUSAMMENFASSUNG

Glaubensvorgänge sind Ausdruck von Hirnfunktion, die der Entstehung von Glaubensinhalten zugrunde liegen. Glaubensvorgänge beruhen auf der Integration von Wahrnehmungs- und Bewertungsvorgängen und ermöglichen eine implizite Verhaltenssteuerung. Die Integration der Wahrnehmung von Objekten und Ereignissen in der Umgebung mit internen emotionalen Zuständen des Individuums führt zu primären Glaubensinhalten. Glaubensinhalte sind komplexe Repräsentationen von subjektiver Relevanz und spiegeln Wahrscheinlichkeiten wider. Sie werden im Gedächtnis gespeichert und beinhalten den Erfahrungshorizont von Individuen. Konzeptuelle Glaubensinhalte sind sprachabhängig und beruhen auf Narrativen, die durch Riten verstärkt werden können. Glaubensinhalte können zwischen Menschen kommuniziert werden und ermöglichen die Weitergabe von subjektiven Erfahrungen. In diesem Beitrag wird das Entstehen, die Modifikation und die pathologische Ausprägung von Glaubensinhalten beschrieben. Im Ausblick wird eine Perspektive auf die sozio-kulturelle Bedeutung von Glaubensvorgängen aufgezeigt.

ABSTRACT

Believing is a fundamental brain function of high complexity. It involves perceptual and evaluative processes that build the basis for an implicit guidance of behavior. Believing results in probabilistic representations of personal relevance, e. g. beliefs, that are stored in memory from where they can be retrieved. The rapidly evolving integration of perception of objects and events in an individual’s environment with their affective meaning for the individual results in so-called primal beliefs. They represent the experiential horizon of individuals. Conceptual beliefs are language-dependent and based on narratives and ritual acts. They can be communicated between different individuals allowing for the exchange of personal experience. Here, the formation, updating, and pathological occurrence of beliefs are described. Finally, a perspective of the socio-cultural implications of the processes of believing will be outlined.



Publication History

Article published online:
03 May 2023

© 2023. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Stuttgart · New York

 
  • Literatur

  • 1 Angel HF.. A History of the evolution of religion: from religion to religiosity to the processes of believing. In: Jay Feierman, Llouis Oviedo (eds): The evolution of religion: how biology, psychology, and theology interact. New York: Routledge/Taylor & Francis; 2020
  • 2 Angel HF, Seitz RJ. Process of believing as fundamental brain function: the concept of credition. SFU Research Bulletin 2016; 03: 1-20
  • 3 Leicester The nature and purpose of belief. The Journal of Mind and Behavior 2008; 29: 217-238
  • 4 Connors M, Halligan P. A cognitive account of belief: A tentative roadmap. Front Psychol 2015; 05: 1588
  • 5 Angel HF.. Pathways and crossroads to creditions: Insights from a retrospective view. Front Psychol. 2022 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.942590
  • 6 Schwitzgebel E.. Belief. In: Zalta E (ed) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 2015 http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2015/entries/belief/
  • 7 Spitzer M. Rituale: Kultur und Psychologie, pro und kontra. Nervenheilkunde 2022; 41: 374-380
  • 8 Spitzer M. Naturwissenschaft und Glaube – Zur Evolution von Religion. Nervenheilkunde 2022; 41: 183-191
  • 9 Brashier NM, Marsh EJ. Judging Truth. Ann Rev Psychol 2020; 71: 499-515
  • 10 Sacks O, Hirsch J. A neurology of belief. Ann Neurol 2008; 63: 129-130
  • 11 Toga AW, Mazziotta JC.. Brain mapping – the systems. San Diego: Academic Press; 2000
  • 12 Adelson EH. Perceptual Organization and the Judgment of Brightness. Science 1993; 262: 2042-2044
  • 13 Zacks J, Tversky B. Event structure in perception and cognition. Psychological Bulletin 2001; 127 (01) 3-21
  • 14 Maravita A, Iriki A.. Tools for the body (schema). Trends Cogn Sci. 2004 10.1016j.tics.2003.12.008
  • 15 Bear A, Fortgang RG, Bronstein MV. et al Mistiming of thought and perception predicts delusionality. PNAS 2017; 114: 10791-10796
  • 16 Parr T, Friston K. Active inference, novelty and neglect. Current Topics in Behavioral Neuroscience 2019; 41: 115-128
  • 17 Bird G, Viding E. The self to other model of empathy: providing a new framework for understanding empathy impairments in psychopathy, autism, and alexithymia. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2014; 47: 520-532
  • 18 Seitz RJ, Franz M, Azari NP. Value judgments and self-control of action: The role of the medial frontal cortex. Brain Res Rev 2009; 60: 368-378
  • 19 Paloutzian R, Park C. Religiousness and spirituality: The psychology of multilevel meaning-making behavior. Religion, Brain & Behavior 2014; 05: 166-178
  • 20 Siegel EH, Wormwood JB, Quigley KS. et al Seeing What You Feel: Affect Drives Visual Perception of Structurally Neutral Faces. Psychol Sci 2018; 29: 496-503
  • 21 Sharot T, Rollwage M, Sunstein CR. et al Why and when beliefs change. Prog Psychol Res. 2022 DOI: 10.1177/17456916221082967
  • 22 Voigt K. Where do our preferences come from? How hard decisions shape our. Front Psychol 2022: 13
  • 23 Dael N, Mortillaro M, Scherer K. Emotion expression in body action and posture. Emotion 2012; 12: 1085-1101
  • 24 Franz M, Nordmann MA, Rehagel C. et al It is in your face – alexithymia impairs facial mimicry. Emotion 2021 DOI: 10.1037/emo0001002
  • 25 Le Doux J.. The emotional brain. The mysterious underpinnings of emotional live. New York: Simon & Schuster; 1996
  • 26 Meyniel F, Schlunegger D, Dehaene S. The Sense of confidence during probabilistic learning: a normative account. PLOS Computerized Biology 2015; 11: e1004305
  • 27 Seitz RJ, Paloutzian RF, Angel HF. From believing to belief: a general theoretical model. J Cog Neurosci 2018; 30: 1254-1264
  • 28 Diederen KM, Ziauddeen H, Vestergaard MD. et al Dopamine Modulates Adaptive Prediction Error Coding in the Human Midbrain and Striatum. J Neurosci 2017; 37: 1708-1720
  • 29 Babayan B, Uchida N, Gershman S. Belief state representation in the dopamine system. Nat. Communicat 2018; 09: 1891
  • 30 Angel HF, Seitz RJ. Violation of expectation as matter for the believing process. Frontiers Psychol 2017; 08: 772
  • 31 Friston K, Parr T, de Vries B. The graphical brain: belief propagation and active inference. Network Neuroscience 2017; 01: 381-414
  • 32 Wegner D. The mind’s best trick: how we experience conscious will. Trends in Cognitive Science 2003; 07: 65-69
  • 33 Oakley D, Halligan P. Chasing the rainbow: the non-conscious nature of being. Frontiers in Psychology 2017; 08: 1924
  • 34 Seitz RJ, Angel HF. Belief formation – a driving force for brain evolution. Brain & Cognition 2020; 140: 1-8
  • 35 Reilly J, Peelle J, Garcia A. et al Linking somatic and symbolic representation in semantic memory: the dynamic multilevel reactivation framework. Psychol Bull Rev 2016; 23: 1002-1014
  • 36 Kaufeld G, Bosker HR, ten Oever S. et al Linguistic structure and meaning organize neural oscillations into a content-specific hierarchy. J Neurosci 2020; 40: 9467-9475
  • 37 Thibodeau P, Boroditsky L. Natural language metaphors covertly influence reasoning. PLOS one 2013; 08: e52961
  • 38 Oviedo L, Szocik K. Religious and other beliefs: how much specificity?. Sage Open 2020: 1-11
  • 39 Howlett J, Paulus M. The neural basis of testable and non-testable beliefs. PLOS one 2015; 10: e0124596
  • 40 Li X, O’Sullivan MJ, Mattingley JB. Delay activity during visual working memory: A meta-analysis of 30 fMRI experiments. Neuroimage 2020; 255: 119204
  • 41 Battistella G, Borghesani V, Henry M. et al Task-Free Functional Language Networks: Reproducibility and Clinical Application. J Neurosci 2020; 40: 1311-1320
  • 42 Fletcher PC, Frith CD, Baker SC. et al The mind’s eye – precuneus activation in memory-related imagery. Neuroimage 1995; 02: 195-200
  • 43 Clairis N, Pessiglione M. Value, confidence, deliberation: a functional partition of the medial prefrontal cortex demonstrated across rating and choice tasks. Neurosci 2022; 42: 5580-5592
  • 44 Galesic M, Stein D. Statistical physics models of belief dynamics: theory and empirical tests. Physica A 2019; 519: 275-294
  • 45 Langdon R, Coltheart M.. The cognitive neuropsychology of delusions. Mind and Language 2020; 15: 184-218
  • 46 Seitz RJ. Beliefs – a challenge in neuropsychological disorders. J Neuropsychol 2022; 16: 21-37
  • 47 Sugiura M, Seitz RJ, Angel H. Models and neural bases of the believing process. JBBS 2017; 05: 12-23
  • 48 Tetreault AM, Phan T, Petersen KJ. et al Network Localization of Alien Limb in Patients with Corticobasal Syndrome. Ann Neurol 2020; 88: 1118-1131
  • 49 Coltheart M, Langdon R, McKay R. Delusional belief. Annual Review of Psychology 2011; 62: 271-298
  • 50 Connors M, Halligan P. Delusions and theories of belief. Conscious Cognition 2020; 81: 102935
  • 51 Conners MH, Coltheart M. On the behaviour of senile dementia patients vis-à-vis the mirror: Ajuriagurra, Strejilevitch and Tissot (1963). Neuropsychologia 2011; 49: 1679-1692
  • 52 Pott J, Schilbach L. Tracking and changing beliefs during social interaction: where computational psychiatry meets cognitive behavioral therapy. Front Psychol 2022; 13: 1010012
  • 53 Seitz RJ, Angel HF, Paloutzian RF. et al Believing and social interactions: effects on bodily expressions and personal narratives Front. Behav Neurosci. 2022 DOI: 10.3389/fnbeh.2022.894219
  • 54 Augusto L. Unconscious knowledge: a survey. Advances in Cognitive Psychology 2010; 06: 116-141
  • 55 Bretas R, Tia B, Yamazaki Y. et al Multisensory integration and belief in the self. Front Psychol 2020; 13: 983592
  • 56 Seitz RJ. Believing and beliefs – neurophysiological underpinnings. Front Behav Neurosci 2022; 16: 880504
  • 57 Schnell T. Spirituality with and without religion. Archives of Psychology of Religion 2012; 34: 33-62
  • 58 Heiphetz L, Landers CL, van Leeuwen N. Does “think” mean the same thing as “believe”? Linguistic insights into regliogious cognition. Psychol Religion Spirituality 2021; 13: 287-297
  • 59 van Elk M.. Proximate and ultimate causes of supernatural beliefs Front Psychol. 2022: 13
  • 60 Hauser M, Chomsky N, Fitch W.. The faculty of language: what is it, who has it, and how did it evolve?. Science 2022; 298: 1569-1579
  • 61 Singer W. A naturalistic approach to the hard problem of consciousness. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience 2019; 13: 58
  • 62 Fuentes A. Evolving belief, evolving minds: Evolutionary insights into the development and functioning of human society. Front Behav Neurosci 2022; 16: 928297
  • 63 Teehan J.. Cognitive science and the limits of theology. In: Trigg R, Barrett J (eds) The roots of religion. Exploring the cognitive science of religion. London: Routledge Publisher; 2014
  • 64 Teehan J. The evolutionary basis of religious ethics. Zygon 2006; 41: 747-773
  • 65 Butterworth J, Trivers R, von Hippel W. The better to fool you with: Deception and self-deception. Curr Opin Psychol 2022; 47: 101385
  • 66 Pauen M, Haynes J. Measuring the mental. Conscious Cognition 2022; 90: 103106
  • 67 Blakemore SJ, Frith C. Self-awareness and action. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2003; 13: 219-224
  • 68 Seitz RJ, Angel HF. Paloutzian. Bridging the gap between believing and memory functions. Eur J Psychol; Psych Arch 2023 DOI: 10.23668/psycharchives.5421
  • 69 Akaishi R, Kolling N, Brown JW. et al Neural mechanisms of credit assignment in a multiclue environment. J Neurosci 2016; 36: 1096-1112
  • 70 Popper K.. Scientific method. In: Miller D (ed) Popper Selections. Princeton: University Press; 1995
  • 71 Seitz RJ, Angel HF, Paloutzian RF. Statements of believing involve attributions. Academia Letters. 2022 Article 4624