Psychiatr Prax 2019; 46(04): 213-216
DOI: 10.1055/a-0825-9049
Originalarbeit
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Gedächtnisambulanzstrukturen in Deutschland – Ergebnisse einer Klinikbefragung

Memory Clinics in Germany – Results of a Hospital Survey
Dix Meiberth
1   Klinik und Poliklinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Uniklinik Köln
,
Michael A. Rapp
2   Sozial- und Präventivmedizin, Universität Potsdam
,
Frank Jessen
1   Klinik und Poliklinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Uniklinik Köln
3   Deutsches Zentrum für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen (DZNE), Bonn
4   Referat Prävention psychischer Erkrankungen, DGPPN
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
14 January 2019 (online)

Zusammenfassung

Ziel der Studie Erfassung der Strukturen zur Frühdiagnostik von Demenzen an Krankenhäusern in Deutschland.

Methodik Fragebogenerhebung.

Ergebnisse 14 % von 1758 kontaktierten Einrichtungen antworteten. 52 % berichteten über ein entsprechendes Angebot, zum großen Teil mit leitlinienorientierten Verfahren, wie Liquordiagnostik. Das Diagnosespektrum umfasste zu 46 % Demenzen und zu 41 % Diagnosen der leichten oder subjektiven kognitiven Störung.

Schlussfolgerung Leitlinienbasierte Diagnostik und Früherkennungskonzepte sind in Gedächtnisambulanzen weitgehend etabliert.

Abstract

Objective To assess the structures for early and differential diagnosis of dementia in hospitals in Germany.

Methods Written questionnaire to all German hospitals.

Results 14 % of 1.758 hospitals responded. Of those, 52 % reported to offer a special service for early dementia diagnosis, mostly on an outpatient basis. The applied methods were in agreement with the national guideline for diagnosis and treatment of dementias, including technical diagnostics, such as neuroimaging and cerebrospinal fluid examinations. 46 % of the diagnostic spectrum were dementia. 41 % were either diagnosed as mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or as subjective cognitive decline (SCD).

Conclusion Despite mostly insufficient reimbursement, a large proportion of the responding hospitals offer a specialized service, which largely adheres to guideline-based diagnostic procedures. The concepts of at-risk and prodromal stages of dementia seem to be largely established.

 
  • Literatur

  • 1 Winblad B, Amouyel P, Andrieu S. et al. Defeating Alzheimer’s disease and other dementias: a priority for European science and society. Lancet Neurol 2016; 15: 455-532
  • 2 Cummings J, Lee G, Ritter A. et al. Alzheimer’s disease drug development pipeline: 2018. Alzheimers Dement (N Y) 2018; 4: 195-214
  • 3 Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 1975; 12: 189-198
  • 4 Kalbe E, Kessler J, Calabrese P. et al. DemTect: a new, sensitive cognitive screening test to support the diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment and early dementia. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2004; 19: 136-143
  • 5 Morris JC, Heyman A, Mohs RC. et al. The Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer’s Disease (CERAD). Part I. Clinical and neuropsychological assessment of Alzheimer’s disease. Neurology 1989; 39: 1159-1165
  • 6 Cuyvers E, Sleegers K. Genetic variations underlying Alzheimer’s disease: evidence from genome-wide association studies and beyond. Lancet Neurol 2016; 15: 857-868
  • 7 Jack Jr CR, Bennett DA, Blennow K. et al. NIA-AA Research Framework: Toward a biological definition of Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement 2018; 14: 535-562
  • 8 Jessen F, Amariglio RE, van Boxtel M. et al. A conceptual framework for research on subjective cognitive decline in preclinical Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement 2014; 10: 844-852
  • 9 DGPPN, DGN. eds. S3-Leitlinie Demenzen. Heidelberg: Springer; 2016